Since Branca has confirmed that we have an agreement with Roma and will be talking to him next week, I believe this deserves its own thread.
I am ok with this signing provided quaresma and one of deco/lampard comes as well.
http://www.calciomercato.com/index.php?c=21&a=84480
Suazo seems to be part of the deal. Sad way for him to go. Never really showed what he can do and then the man who wanted him gets fired.
http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/?action=read&id=108444
Forza Inter per sempre!!!!
Jose responding after the derby:"We could only have lost by having six people on the park, as even with seven, we would have won. "
New Domain name www.forzainterforums.com
cesar solari out mancini in seems good to me
and 1 or 2 strikers should leave anyway so it's a good deal imo
now get aquilai too from the bastards
If the Quaresma rumour is true and we are also after A.Mancini, then it would either mean 4-3-3 or 4-4-2:
But that would mean that Zlatan would be playing in the CF role ??
Or, we could just be after A.Mancini and might get him IF the club which Quaresma has joined is Chelsea or by any chance R.Madrid.
I hope this doesn't mean the end of Quaresma here. If we get both Mancini and Quaresma giving up Suazo in the process, it seems we are going for more wings and less strikers. Especially since Crespo is leaving (he has actually offered himself to Ancelotti!) as well. We're left with Ibra, Cruz, Mario (Adri).
"It will be born here, at the "Orologio (Watch)" restaurant, meeting place of artists and it will be always a team of great talent. On this splendid night it's colours will be given: The black and the blue with a golden background of the stars. It will be called Internazionale, because we are brothers of the world."
Mourinho for Inter coach 2008/2009! --> Mourinho = Inter coach 2008/2009!
Never been a fan of 442 but it would be ok if Quaresma and Mancini play as wingers and we have two forwards. It would be one hell of an attacking lineup.
IO SONO INTERISTA
No, don't worry we're still after Quaresma... Oh btw we traded Mancini for Suazo so I think we kinda did well on the deal.
With Queresma being so expensive, A. Mancini is a better choice.
For Roma, A.Mancini almost played as a farward and was often the only player to take the ball farward on the counter because hes the only player who had the pace. That being said it was always predictable that he would cut in or try to play a one-two with totti or whoever. What im trying to say is for Roma he was not really utilized as a winger since he could almost never make a cross into the box because their would never be anyone their.
For Inter, he would be able to drive down the flanks and deliver crosses into the box since he has the farwards to do so and wont be so predictable. Thus i think he will be a different player for Inter as he will play under a differnt system.
Last edited by Joss; 12 Jun 08 at 19:10.
I use to rate Mancini high like i said in the mids topic, 2-3 and 4 years ago, in the last months he didn't shine, looks inconsistent
and have SHITTY attitude, like it or not.
But this is not a bad deal, Roma wins a lot because Mancini will be FA next year, win 4 millions, and Suazo who is perfect for them and cost us 14 millions....
we change positions because a midfielder is more needed than a striker.
Originally Posted by Pravesh
If the Quaresma rumour is true and we are also after A.Mancini, then it would either mean 4-3-3 or 4-4-2:
But that would mean that Zlatan would be playing in the CF role ??
Or, we could just be after A.Mancini and might get him IF the club which Quaresma has joined is Chelsea or by any chance R.Madrid.
This look like a hell of team.
-------Zanetti---Cambiasso-------
---------Lampard or Deco---------
----Quaresma--------------------
----------Zlatan------Balotelli----
Subs:
-------Vieira-----Pele---------
------Stankovic or Jimenez------
----Mancini--------------------
---------Cruz-------Adriano----
Obviously Quaresma and Mancini would fight for a spot, anything is guaranteed.
both players who were not used well by their old clubs... lets just hope Suazo doesnt come back to bite us in the ars
can we stop buying fking MFs!!!
Hamed just busted 1 over this.
I like Mancini, but we should've got him 2 years ago...not now.
i hope he plays as good or better than his first season at roma
Although he is not exactly getting any younger, still I believe considering his price tag (compared to Quaresma) and his vast Serie A experience he definitely is the better option of the two.
Noi non siamo gobbi ba$tardi
"In un mondo di puttane e oportunisti noi avevamo scelto la migliore; Addio Traditore!"
R.I.P Cipe
As long as Suazo is part of the deal, im all for it.
Mancini is terribly inconsistent and will be nothing more than a squad player, but still an upgrade to the crap we have on the bench atm.
Branca will meet with A. Mancini's agent on 20 June to discuss personal terms.
http://www.calciomercato.it/dettagli...92&RecXPage=10
"Inter has always been a crazy team, they lose when they need to win and vice versa. It's in their DNA...".
Sandro Mazzola
"Why haven't I kissed the Inter shirt yet? For one reason only: first I have to win and earn the faith of all those who support me in this adventure."
Samuel Eto'o
Suazo would of been good as a wing forward. His quicker then mancini.
Lets hope we dont pay over the odds. I'm now sure we will play more on the wings rather than through the middle. 4-3-3 if Quaresma comes too for sure.
Everything a man should be. We miss you Cipe.
If A. Mancini does arrive, I hope he will be playing on the left flank to support Maxwell in attacks. Maicon got all the right hand side fire power covered
I'm waiting for Hamed's autobiography on Mancini. It'll probably roll in within the next 24 hours citing the greatness of how good he'll be without Totti
If this is an alternative to Quaresma, it's an average move at best. The Brazilian is half the player the Portuguese is and is probably as temperamental as Q is. Obviously money is the key factor here.
Mancini is usless these days.. i thought we wanted to win the CL ?
What wing does he usually play on; right or left? Is he right or left footed?
Posting Permissions
