"Thread dedicated to the world's greatest NT
View attachment 5856
View attachment 5857
View attachment 5858"
"A thread to remind everyone that we almost swapped Škriniar for this guy.
"
"Couldn't find any threads with this specific topic, so here goes:
Bosingwa to QPR
Daniel Alves to São Paulo
Willian to Arsenal"
These are examples of threads with "potential for great discussion"? What are you smoking?! Just look at how uninterested people are in engaging with that sort of nonsense, based on the replies.
There's a difference between bumping old, already-existing threads - sometimes it actually acts as a framework for discussion, most of the times it's an amusing inlook at the time-capsule that is FIF - and clocking the forum with spam. Why is there a thread in flamers' paradise about a random Tottenham player we were briefly linked with?
Why is there a thread about one of the smallest nations in Europe's national team? We don't even have any San Marinese members.
If 'activity' or number of threads is a goal in and of itself, why not just create a thread for every single topic in the world?
He's already been told to cool it down with the thread creating, to no avail.
For the record, I think Nelson as a member has been a good addition to the forums overall, but there's a reason we have rules regarding thread creation.