- Joined
- Jul 11, 2014
- Messages
- 3,493
- Likes
- 2,015
- Favorite Player
- #3, #4
Forum Supporter
This makes it sound like it's up to Hakan.
This makes it sound like it's up to Hakan.
The way Juve was awarded winS was WAY worse. As they were against direct rivals.It would feel just wrong if we didn't have to win Bologna on the pitch, I definitely want to see this match to be played.
Imagine this happens to Juventus or Milan and they're awarded a win this way.
I don't care what Juve did get or did not get. I want us winning fair and square. That keeps us in the moral highground.The way Juve was awarded winS was WAY worse. As they were against direct rivals.
Yes,100%.if Inter were to win the Scudetto at the end of the season with a forfeited result(s), do you think that would delegitimise winning the Championship?
I don't share the same opinion. Nothing is unfair here; it was Bologna who skipped the match, not us. They COULD send their Primavera but they didn't.I don't care what Juve did get or did not get. I want us winning fair and square. That keeps us in the moral highground.
Also no one would have sympathy if it was the other way around.
This is just absolute horse shit.I don't share the same opinion. Nothing is unfair here; it was Bologna who skipped the match, not us. They COULD send their Primavera but they didn't.
If the match will be replayed, it would be unfair to us, as we are the away team:
1/ We have been wasting our time of preparation & traveling for a cause not our fault.
2/ We must add one extra match to our upcoming fully-packed schedule. Imagine if FIGC put this match some days before Milano derby, well, you see who is getting the disadvantage.
Fuck gentleman attitude, bro. At the end of the day, Scudetto is all that matters. Every slight advantage counts.
What did we do wrong to be compared to Juve? You say as if we put a gun on Bologna's head to forbid them from going to their stadium, jesus.This is just absolute horse shit.
Your attitude is more like Juve, winning no matter what it takes.
I prefer winning on the pitch.
What's your take on it when figc granted Juve a 3-0 because Napoli couldn't play?I don't share the same opinion. Nothing is unfair here; it was Bologna who skipped the match, not us. They COULD send their Primavera but they didn't.
If the match will be replayed, it would be unfair to us, as we are the away team:
1/ We have been wasting our time of preparation & traveling for a cause not our fault.
2/ We must add one extra match to our upcoming fully-packed schedule. Imagine if FIGC put this match some days before Milano derby, well, you see who is getting the disadvantage.
Fuck gentleman attitude, bro. At the end of the day, Scudetto is all that matters. Every slight advantage counts.
1/ It was at Juve home. We had to travel.What's your take on it when figc granted Juve a 3-0 because Napoli couldn't play?
Btw, I agree that all I care about is the 3 points.
1. How is that relevant?1/ It was at Juve home. We had to travel.
2/ That Juve-Napoli match was before there was a legit rule about the case. Our match is after. It says clearly if there are >13 players available the match should be played.
3/ Napoli wasn't allowed to travel at all while the local rule didn't forbid Bologna Primavera to attend the match. It was their fault to forfeit it.
Travelling means extra energy wasted. Not that far of a distance between the two cities, but still, why do we have to do extra effort for some reasons not our fault?1. How is that relevant?
2. That's not true, the rule was obvious even then the match has to be played if more than 13 players are available, here's a link dated to the Juve vs Napoli match stating the rule. I'm guessing the new rule is 13 people including Primaveras
(https://the18.com/en/soccer-news/why-napoli-forfeit-juventus)
3. Bologna was ready to play but ASL ordered them not to play as explained by Marotta as well whereas ADL actually refused to play lol
The situation is chaotic," Marotta told Sky Sport ocal health authorities who decided independently.
"Bologna were ready to play and they suffered the situation from ASL which have taken this decision to protect everyone's health, but clarity is missing. I would limit the ASL's power otherwise, we'll always face similar situations in the future."