- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
- Messages
- 111
- Likes
- 65
Lol, how is that a good news? Inter likely won't be able to afford players like Alexis Sanchez and Eriksen without the growth decree
Lol, how is that a good news? Inter likely won't be able to afford players like Alexis Sanchez and Eriksen without the growth decree
How can they prove Pjanic-Arthur was a sham transaction? Two players changed clubs and both played for those clubs. It's impossible to prove there wasn't business purpose in that transaction.But that does matter. In sham transactions, the auditor is analysing the true nature of the transaction, who fiscally benefited, and the business purpose.
Allegedly in the Pinmonte case, he was disposed of for above FMV, and then repurchased for that FMV or above. Actual consideration was exchanged. So whatever tax benefit was obtained was offset.
In the Juve - Barca swap, you have a sham transaction, inadequate consideration, and no real business purpose, since neither player made their clubs more competitive.
Of course these allegations are hard to prove, but essentially the auditors are considering 1) whether a fiscal benefit resulted, 2) did the parties device or disguise the true nature of the transaction, and was 3) there a bona fide business purpose.
I think this will all depend on the evidence the auditors have in their possession.
If for example, there was evidence to show that Juve was demanding 20 million for Pjanic and he was disposed of for a valuation of 50 million than that's a solid case and similar for Arthur, if Barca was shopping him around for 20 million and 2 months later sold him for a valuation for 30 plus million that will show he was disposed for above FMV.
They are reportedly on tape saying it.How can they prove Pjanic-Arthur was a sham transaction? Two players changed clubs and both played for those clubs. It's impossible to prove there wasn't business purpose in that transaction.
Only case I can see there is something tangible is that there's the "smoking gun" ie. they've wiretapped the fuck out of Juve directors and hear them say this guy is worth nothing but we value him this and this much in the deal to create artificial plusvalenza.
Thats the worst optimised image/page I've ever seenSeletti x Juventus - Juventus Official Online Store
store.juventus.com
Juve is about to prove that they have big revenue from this.
Well I think in these sham transactions there is usually a reverse onus, where Juve will need to demonstrate the business purpose.How can they prove Pjanic-Arthur was a sham transaction? Two players changed clubs and both played for those clubs. It's impossible to prove there wasn't business purpose in that transaction.
Only case I can see there is something tangible is that there's the "smoking gun" ie. they've wiretapped the fuck out of Juve directors and hear them say this guy is worth nothing but we value him this and this much in the deal to create artificial plusvalenza.
Yeah this is going backwards imoWhy is this good news? how else can Serie a compete with wages EPL and PSG are throwing around?
well I understand your reaction cause you are judging his value based on his status @ Inter. We have 4 strikers and you wouldn't spend 20M on a 5th striker like Pinamonti. But two years ago or when was it, you probably wasn't willing to let him go for less than that. Cutrone was sold to Wolves for what? 30 M? correct me if I'm wrong.GTFO with Pinamonti's 20m valuation being fair.
Haven't you heard, he is shit because we didn't buy himVlahovic 12th Serie A goal. Dzeko&Lautaro has 14 between them.
Couldn't care less about reputation of the league.I want juve destroyed but I wonder what yet another scandal in Italian football will do in terms of damage to the reputation of the league and its attractiveness to investors, fans and players alike
All first depends if Juve's downfall happensThe better he does, the more they want for him, and chances of him going to Jube are lesser. Unless of course, he acts cuntish like his predecessors at Fiorentina did.
I'm just saying, the guy is sitting on 5 goals this season, which is the same as Osihmen, Ibra, and Lorenzo Pellegrini. It's also more than: Insigne, Dybala, Chiesa, Morata, Belotti, Raspadori, Scamacca, Giroud, Leao, Kean, etc., etc. While playing for EmpoliGTFO with Pinamonti's 20m valuation being fair.
Spoken like a true accountant.GTFO with Pinamonti's 20m valuation being fair.
I'm also more interested in those deals where Juve swapped random names for several millions with Marseille.
The point is however it's simply impossible to determine this fair value. Who is going to prove it and how will that proof hold in court?