2009/2010 Midfielders rumours topic

[Barbas]

even if we get Fabregas, i think he will play for Inter maximum 5 years.
He will back to spain before age 29. That's different with Hamsik, he can be our legend like Zanetti

Probably, but he will be likely to go with high price tag, like ibra, considering that xavi will be old at that time and how barcelona always want to have him back. Also, on paper, fabregas can give us more than what hamsik can offer atm.

 

[Black&Blue]

I like Hamsik but Fabregas is just on another level,there's no debate.

 

[CafeCordoba]

This quote doesn't equal this:


Does it ?

Playing for a "big club like Inter", and openly admiting he would like to play Inter someday is quite a difference, or maybe not ?

Do you see often players admiting something like that publicly ? (And I don't mean players like Tavano)

Because I don't.

I still believe that the quote is not an original one (said by Hamsik literally) or that it is taken out of the context. But your point is more connected to the belief that Inter have a chance to get Hamsik if he ever leaves, and it's okay like that. We have perhaps a disagreement over the percentages for it but actually that disagreement is irrelevant.

---------------------------------------------------

When it comes to Anderson, he really hasn't lived up the expectations in Man Utd, but he's still very young. He cost over 20m€, so Man Utd really thought he could become something. Nothing is yet closed for Anderson, albeit his rift with Ferguson might end his career at Man Utd. Probably we will be never linked to Anderson.

 

[Luka]

I checked the youtube video of this particular interview, and it wasn't Hamsik who mentioned Inter himself, but he was asked if in the future he would like to play at Inter, and he answered the standard: "I obviously like Inter, they are the strongest team etc. etc.".

The quote has weaker meaning now, because it was a standard reply when people ask say Kaka if he would like to play at Real someday, but I still think we would be favourite, because of the fact that Hamsik is playing in Italy, and we're the strongest team.

Cafe assumes that we have slim chances because of the fact that we couldn't afford him, not that Hamsik wouldn't choose us over other foreign clubs, and I actually think that the second part is always the most important part. If Hamsik will pick us over other clubs, I think Moratti will go extra mile and match the price that foreigh clubs might offer for him.

...

ps. Wasn't Anderson bought for 30 mln and not 20 mln ?

 

[CafeCordoba]

That quote thing was something I was looking for, that it is almost put into his mouth etc.

You are right that if we can make Hamsik want to come precisely Inter, we are winning. But the thing is, he doesn't seem like a guy who could do the Chivus and block transfers to other top clubs. However, we can wait for couple of months and then see when the rumor mill starts to push its products. If Hamsik is there for real, it's nice. If not, then hopefully there are some other interesting players.

I don't know for sure about the transfer fee of Anderson. In Wikipedia the reported fee is £18m so at that time it was something over 20m€ (20-25m€). I recalled myself also that figure 30m€ but I have nothing to back that info.

Now that I checked some old articles, figures differ of course. Somewhere it was £30m for both Anderson and Nani, somewhere it was reported that they both cost under ~£18m€ (25m€ at that time) a piece. Well, we can say that Anderson was still pretty expensive, something in the range of 20-25m€.

 

[Luka]

But the thing is, he doesn't seem like a guy who could do the Chivus and block transfers to other top clubs.

As I have nothing to back me up yet, I can agree to that, although I think it's also obvious he is not Ibrahimovic type. Currently he seems somewhere in the middle, we'll see how it goes along the way.

 

[n4l]

some of you guys are the funniest people alive..

so from some of the comments i'm reading, people think that 20mil is the maximum they'll pay for hamsik (and that he's really worth 15-16mil), but you don't mind paying 15-20mil for kolarov?

some of the ideas on this forum are simply ludicrous, make absolutely no sense, and seem to come from la-la land

 

[rsz85]

i would really like Anderson. He would be a perfect CM in the left-side of the diamond (in Muntari/Motta position)
He was a trequartista at Porto, so he is very technical, but Ferguson moved him back and thought him run and tackle. He became a very useful guy.

Very annoying, he isnt linked with us.

 

[rsz85]

That's different with Hamsik, he can be our legend like Zanetti

These are a bit strong sentences, don't you think that?

you are talking a guy who never played at Inter. can be a new-Mancini here or even a star, too.

Fabregas is a superstar now, he would be another Sneidjer-calibre fan's favourite and the world would consider us a big club to get such a big player.

With a pinch of salt, Hamsik is known in the Italian championship only. (At least considering the hype around Fabregas)

 

[n4l]

anderson is very technical?
the la-la land ideas get even worse..

lmao

i really question if people watch any football at all

 

[skeet]

anderson is very technical?
the la-la land ideas get even worse..

lmao

i really question if people watch any football at all

you are the only one in this forum who thinks anderson has poor passing and poor technique so maybe you should actually watch him play instead of getting your info from video games

 

[n4l]

you are the only one in this forum who thinks anderson has poor passing and poor technique so maybe you should actually watch him play instead of getting your info from video games

i guess i am delusional..
i guess sir Alex and Dunga are also delusional, especially since they've given him chance after chance to prove himself (for 2+ years now)

the guy cannot win a spot over an ageing gilberto silva or felipe melo..
actually, he is even lower in the pecking order, since josue comes in before him.

the guy cannot win a spot over carrick and fletcher..lmao

I want this guy on our team! :rollani:

 

[Luka]

i would really like Anderson. He would be a perfect CM in the left-side of the diamond (in Muntari/Motta position)
He was a trequartista at Porto, so he is very technical, but Ferguson moved him back and thought him run and tackle. He became a very useful guy.

Very annoying, he isnt linked with us.

Have you ever heard about Anderson proffesionalism and his disciplinary issues ?

 

[Pajo]

you are the only one in this forum who thinks anderson has poor passing and poor technique so maybe you should actually watch him play instead of getting your info from video games

I think the same too...

Anderson is average.. his advantages to all our midfielders is his age, he can and imo will develop. He always uses his speed to pass players, not tehnique.. His technique is zero... his passing is average, while his speed is great. That can be an advangae, but he is not a player i want... I would rather pay 10 mils more to get Manuel Fernandes Who is cheaper btw lol

 

[skeet]

i guess i am delusional..
i guess sir Alex and Dunga are also delusional, especially since they've given him chance after chance to prove himself (for 2+ years now)

the guy cannot win a spot over an ageing gilberto silva or felipe melo..
actually, he is even lower in the pecking order, since josue comes in before him.

the guy cannot win a spot over carrick and fletcher..lmao

I want this guy on our team! :rollani:

just because he can't win a spot in his team doesn't mean he is not technical, those two things are in no way related

and fletcher and carrick would be automatic starters at inter, especially carrick who is very underrated and is just what we are missing in midfield, a mobile box-to-box playmaker with a killer pass

 

[n4l]

just because he can't win a spot in his team doesn't mean he is not technical, those two things are in no way related

and fletcher and carrick would be automatic starters at inter, especially carrick who is very underrated and is just what we are missing in midfield, a mobile box-to-box playmaker with a killer pass

i really hope you are not serious with this statement


ps
i am not going to argue this anymore....
the guy is fast, strong, and aggressive and that is it...
his passing, trapping/receiving, shooting (these are TECHNICAL qualities) are all rubbish
please refer to pajo's post above

 

[skeet]

i really hope you are not serious with this statement


ps
i am not going to argue this anymore....
the guy is fast, strong, and aggressive and that is it...
his passing, trapping/receiving, shooting (these are TECHNICAL qualities) are all rubbish
please refer to pajo's post above

you say that technical qualities are passing trapping and shooting, and pajo refers to technique as being able to dribble players

i'm not denying that anderson is not a dribbler, but even pajo stated that his passing is average, i didn't say his passing is world class but it's fairly decent and his trapping is also good

 

[Black&Blue]

Have you ever heard about Anderson proffesionalism and his disciplinary issues ?

I read that he's an alcoholist like Robinho

 

[rsz85]

i dont know this problems about Anderson.

But looking all his footballing skills (you can say it anyway) he would be a fix starter here, because he is better than Motta, Muntari, Quaresma, Mancini and maybe Stankovic

 

[Antonio2810]

some of you guys are the funniest people alive..

so from some of the comments i'm reading, people think that 20mil is the maximum they'll pay for hamsik (and that he's really worth 15-16mil), but you don't mind paying 15-20mil for kolarov?

some of the ideas on this forum are simply ludicrous, make absolutely no sense, and seem to come from la-la land

i completely agree...hamsik isn't worth 20mil € and kolarov is?

i didn't watch kolarov a lot,but he is attacking fullback,maicon type...so he should provide crosses,and assists and maybe a few goals...but if stats are correct he has 1 goal and 0 assists in 20 games with average rating 5,75.and many of you said he isn't so good at defending...
so we should pay 20 mil for attacking fullback that obviously cant attack(according to stats) and is average at defending...
hamsik is CM but he scored 8 goals and provided 3 assists which is great in my opinion for his position.and we need his type of player more than a LB.
according to transfermarkt hamsik is worth 24 mil,and kolarov 9mil €
so in my opinion i would pay for hamsik 30 mil(maybe a little more)but for kolarov i wouldn't give more than 11...