You always speak of me reading something in a newspaper, which ironically is something I do not do as I detest the sports journalism industry. Whatever media stuff I read is usually from this place or whatever my Whatsapp group is feeding me with.
Whenever I speak "with certainty", it's because I know what I'm talking about. On the other hand, you will always seek for a journalist's approval or source for everything you read which is even more ironic
And to answer the previous page's question. No, I did not read some Brescia Today newspaper but they probably have better information than others. Or maybe they wanted to gain an exclusive after a mere phone call between executives that involved a certain promise.
Okay, then, prove to me we had an agreement with Modric? Because you make that statement so quickly without any evidence, citation, or anything
Oh wait, I guess its your magic 'my friends in the industry' BULLSHIT again.
You're a waste of breath, electrons, and bytes.
From my side, when I talk about newspaper articles, I only refer to them as potentials. Look at the Eriksen thing, as one. These are the implications IF it is true. I avoid speculating about player signings unless I'm personally keen on a signing (e.g. Tonali), so I call BREHMEBULLSHIT on that.
Actually, hell, you realistically cant generate any actual proof of the Modric thing.
Why dont you give us some inside info based on the stuff you 'know what you're talking about'? Many of your assertions come after the fact, and aren't verifiable.
Give us something that actually happens soon, isn't already in the press, etc. Not, for example, 'Inter will sign Darmian' because that shit's been going on for ages, or something like... 'Inter will sign Messi within 2 seasons'. If you've got such a great source of information, fucking back it up.
The biggest of false prophets are the people who tell you 'I told you so' after the fact. And I'm not taking the 'economists have predicted 18 of the last 3 recessions' bullshit either.