2020/2021 Forwards Rumours Thread

[Choppin Onions]

Tbh, id go for Diego Costa. He is still good player and a fighter. We cohld get him on cheap loan + option, without losing Alexis.

Move over Christian, you’re no longer the most despised Inter player in Conte’s squad.

 

[PHM1605]

Tbh, id go for Diego Costa. He is still good player and a fighter. We cohld get him on cheap loan + option, without losing Alexis.

We can't pay a donut unless the opposite takes our popcorn in exchange. And you are talking about 9.5m/year range...

 

[Capo]

Here's a detailed article about the growth decree.

https://www.dlapiper.com/en/italy/insights/publications/2019/07/new-tax-incentives-for-attracting-human-capital/

Regarding Sanchez, you're right we pay him 7.5 net wages. The difference is in the taxes we pay to the Italian government. While Dzeko costs to Roma around 13m Sanchez only costs around 9m as he's eligible for the growth decree.

Dzeko is earning 7.5m because the then Roma sporting director Gianluca Petrachi, a.k.a. Paratici bitch, gave Dzeko a raise from 4.5m to 7.5m in 2019 (on top of taking Spinazzola for 30n) in order to prevent Dzeko joing Inter.

I think a lot of this mis-leading the club pays whatever the gross contract value is, if a player is subject to "Growth Decree" say 50% exempt of tax thats fine. However Inter still pays 7mil pa, the italian government takes less and the player has a higher net paid to his bank account.

Inter still pays the 7mil and not 3.5mil........the growth decree is for the players benefit not the club (the player is paying tax and not the club). I assume there is another tax law that allows Inter to capitalise or depreciate the salaries and use that a write off on the bottom line which would help with overall management of the books.

 

[Candreva Crosses]

I think a lot of this mis-leading the club pays whatever the gross contract value is, if a player is subject to "Growth Decree" say 50% exempt of tax thats fine. However Inter still pays 7mil pa, the italian government takes less and the player has a higher net paid to his bank account.

Inter still pays the 7mil and not 3.5mil........the growth decree is for the players benefit not the club (the player is paying tax and not the club). I assume there is another tax law that allows Inter to capitalise or depreciate the salaries and use that a write off on the bottom line which would help with overall management of the books.

I think you need to read that again. You've got it all wrong.

- - - Updated - - -

The shit you can find on this forum. Diego Costa, Kumbulla instead of Skriniar, what more, maybe sell Barella?

 

[CafeCordoba]

I think a lot of this mis-leading the club pays whatever the gross contract value is, if a player is subject to "Growth Decree" say 50% exempt of tax thats fine. However Inter still pays 7mil pa, the italian government takes less and the player has a higher net paid to his bank account.

Inter still pays the 7mil and not 3.5mil........the growth decree is for the players benefit not the club (the player is paying tax and not the club). I assume there is another tax law that allows Inter to capitalise or depreciate the salaries and use that a write off on the bottom line which would help with overall management of the books.

Clubs pay the salaries. Dunno how it's technically done in Italy, but basically Sanchez is the one who gets 7m€ net to his bank account (not literally, but for the sake of this conversation we use annual salary here). However it costs the club more than the 7m€ to pay Sanchez's salary because the government wants the taxes off from that paid salary. So the club pays the taxes on top of the 7m€ which will go to Sanchez.

It's clubs and players who benefit from this Growth Decree.

Clubs: they can tempt more expensive players to Italy because tax part is smaller thus the overall cost of the player stays at certain level but the money player gets is bigger than usual => clubs can take part in bigger player market per the salary demands

Players: they have more options for their next club as Italian clubs can pay bigger salaries than usual because the mechanism I just explained above.

 

[Il Drago]

British Journalist Nizaar Kinsella: “Olivier Giroud’s Move To Inter Fell Apart Because Chelsea Failed To Sign Edinson Cavani”

Inter were on the verge of signing French international striker Olivier Giroud in January 2020 but the deal fell apart when Chelsea failed to sign a replacement for him, British journalist Nizaar Kinsella has revealed.

Speaking to The Italian Football Podcast Kinsella revealed that Giroud and Inter had already signed a contract and the former Arsenal striker was raring to move to the Nerazzurri.

However, the deal was conditioned on Chelsea being able to sign a replacement for the Frenchman but failed to do so when being unable to capture Edinson Cavani as well as Dries Mertens, so Giroud ended up staying with the Blues.

“Giroud to Inter in January 2020 was all lined up. Giroud was 100 percent going to Inter. It had a condition attached to the transfer, that Chelsea had to find a replacement.

“They went for Edinson Cavani and Dries Mertens. Neither transfer Chelsea could get done. They were open to a loan deal or buying the last six months of their contracts.

“Chelsea didn’t want to pay a big fee or offer a long contract for an older player. So it proved too difficult to do.

“Giroud had a contract signed for Inter. The transfer fee wasn’t going to be a problem, Inter and Chelsea were only a million out in negotiations. He was ready to go.

“Frank Lampard was quite annoyed about it. Because he wanted Giroud out as his head had been turned and he wanted a new striker in. Lampard was annoyed. Especially seeing Man Utd sign Bruno Fernandes that month.”

Inter were not the only club interested in Giroud as both Lazio and Tottenham were very keen on signing him, and the player was also open to moving to either of those clubs.

However, Kinsella continues, Chelsea weren’t going to let former coach José Mourinho get his hands on Giroud but weren’t going to stand in the Frenchman’s way otherwise, if a replacement had been found.

“He would have happily gone to Lazio or Spurs too, who both wanted to sign Giroud too. Chelsea would have blocked the Spurs transfer and Lazio couldn’t offer as good terms as Inter.

“So Inter was his destination and it collapsed because Chelsea couldn’t get a replacement.”

Kinsella is very reliable about Chelsea.

 

[wera]

a shame the move didn't happen, he'd be good here

 

[Nerazzurri_Ninja]

What ever happened to Vietto, can we get him

 

[CoolMan44]

What ever happened to Vietto, can we get him

Only if Al-Hilal accept the transfer.

He has a whopping 14 goals in the last 5.5 years.

 

[YoramG]

Couple of days ago El Chiringuito said that we, as well as Juve, PSG, and Barca, are interested in Aguero. Free agent in the summer.

Usually I’d laugh, but they are the ones who broke the Hakimi transfer so who knows

 

[NimAraya]

Couple of days ago El Chiringuito said that we, as well as Juve, PSG, and Barca, are interested in Aguero. Free agent in the summer.

Usually I’d laugh, but they are the ones who broke the Hakimi transfer so who knows

It was laughable if he wasnt a free agent, but with him, Messi and Di Maria all out of contract this summer anything is possible. Just bad that there are many question marks regarding the change of ownership, the coach's future and the financial situation at Inter, so we dont really know who comes and who goes and how much the club have to offer to these players, or what Conte or the new coach wants regarding the desirable transfers.

 

[Doffy]

As long as we dont end up with adolfo

 

[varmin]

A rumor linking us to Origi from Liverpool.
Also, Catalan publication Sport claims that Conte wants Isco

 

[TheNetworkZ]

Origi is interesting, I wouldn't complain honestly. He would be a decent back-up.

Not quite sure why we would be linked to Isco when the priority should be a LWB and not an Eriksen substitute (at best).

 

[CafeCordoba]

Isco is a pure BS by Spanish media.

 

[Tamirk]

I just read in Israeli sport website that inter going for muriel for next year and the price is 25-30m, i hope this is real, he can excellent backup and rotation player..

 

[IM21]

Inter wont be paying 30M for a backup.

 

[ElDuccio]

I just read in Israeli sport website that inter going for muriel for next year and the price is 25-30m, i hope this is real, he can excellent backup and rotation player..

Yeah Gds said this. Apparently we are trying to sell Joao mario and some other players. Muriel would be amazing. I would pay that money if you only think about how much goals he scored only as substitute. Him and Sanchez could always change a game but also give a rest Lukaku and Lautaro. We already saw that big rom can't play every game. You need a good backup.

Maybe 30M is a litle bit too much, 20-25 would be good.

 

[Ronaldo]

Inter wont be paying 30M for a 30 year old backup.

Fixed.

 

[varmin]

Yeah Gds said this. Apparently we are trying to sell Joao mario and some other players. Muriel would be amazing. I would pay that money if you only think about how much goals he scored only as substitute. Him and Sanchez could always change a game but also give a rest Lukaku and Lautaro. We already saw that big rom can't play every game. You need a good backup.

Maybe 30M is a litle bit too much, 20-25 would be good.

I think it will be Muriel OR Sanchez. Not both of them.