- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
- Messages
- 14,799
- Likes
- 29,309
- Favorite Player
- Dumbfries

Last edited:
I'll go for Blake Lively if my wife leaves.Lol, Tuttosport say we will try Dybala if Arnautovic leaves.
I’m going to selectively believe this rumour and ignore everything else that shitrag saysLol, Tuttosport say we will try Dybala if Arnautovic leaves.
I’m going to selectively believe this rumour and ignore everything else that shitrag says
The idea of a Turin-based shitrag of a journal having the details on this absolutely screams bullshit.
He isn’t as bad as you make him look like.“Players like Gudmonsson” I swear this dude is mediocre as fuck and has 20 replacements.
This is sickening.
I'm talking about players who have a lot of options this summer, not about their qualities.
He isn’t as bad as you make him look like.
Yes he is kinda mediocre and I don’t believe he is ever going to be a key player for a club like Inter. But he does have some characteristics we currently lack.
Problem is we just don’t have those 40 mln in cash (and for 40 mln we don’t gonna have someone way better imo).I said he’s mediocre not bad. Which means paying 30 million for a mediocre player is a bad deal. Id rather just add the extra 10 and a player and get someone better.
I don’t care if the club wants cheaper alternatives in goal or in rwb. The striker position is simply too important.
Then we shouldn’t sign anyone. Save the money play with the current squad and use it next summer when we saved even more money.Problem is we just don’t have those 40 mln in cash (and for 40 mln we don’t gonna have someone way better imo).
Gudmundsson is only a option when we can use counterparts and we sell Arnautovic (which is unlikely tho). So probably he ain’t coming anyway.
Fully agree.Then we shouldn’t sign anyone. Save the money play with the current squad and use it next summer when we saved even more money.
I don’t think a player like this elevates us. So why get a player we may try to sell in a year?
But on who we wasted actual money, besides Arnautovic, last season?Yes I heard the same every summer "we don't have enough for a good player". Then we waste smaller on craps. Summing up the smalls + salary you would be surprise of the huge amount.
Don't tell me we need Arnautovic to win Scudetto last season. All I see is he is blocking the slot of another one whom worth it.
With three strikers experience enough we don't need to spend 30m on one not superior to them. Save those 30m, sell kids for cash or whatever, then add more on top next summer.
This was a long past debate and I wouldn't relapse. Check last summer ~10m deals all over Europe and you'll see many of them have been out of our price range now.But on who we wasted actual money, besides Arnautovic, last season?
I’m sure if we handled the whole Lukaku saga differently, we didn’t signed Arnautovic but someone else (or even extended Dzeko). And given our system we needed 4 strikers we thought we could rely on.
We signed Pavard, Frattesi, Sommer, Augusto and Bisseck for actual money besides Arna. And they all worked out pretty well for us didn’t they? You can’t expect you have a 100% score.
I said he’s mediocre not bad. Which means paying 30 million for a mediocre player is a bad deal. Id rather just add the extra 10 and a player and get someone better.
I don’t care if the club wants cheaper alternatives in goal or in rwb. The striker position is simply too important.