Achraf Hakimi

[Ethor]

Adios Hakimi, and good luck until PSG plays Inter.

 

[nelsonrivas2011]

Shukran Hakimi

 

[CafeCordoba]

Yes, but there's a difference between being on a five year contract and being paid peanuts and being on a five year contract and getting paid 10 million per season.

There is absolutely no way that we can compete with the likes of PSG and City when it comes to wages and trying to retain our players.

Hakimi, thanks for the fling! It was great while it lasted!

Hakimi has 5m€ net salary at Inter. Not exactly a peanuts contract. Surely less than what PSG offers (8m€ + 2m€ bonus per season), but it's not like it's not a normal salary for a top player who moves to PSG. All of them gets crazy wages.

And this move has nothing to do with the salary, Hakimi hasn't pushed for this move, until he realized we want to sell him.

Really sucks that we can't get even 70m€ guaranteed money while the initial ask was 80m€. It ends up being 65m€ + bonuses reaching to around 70m€. Not a good deal. We won't make even 40m€ plusvalenza with this sale.

 

[bubba zanetti]

This was idiotic deal, so tipical for Inter.

 

[Il Drago]

We gave him a five-year contract too, and a lot of good that did. Maybe next year Moneybags FC will buy him off PSG for a quintillion dollars.

PSG never sell their best players. Never. No matter what. They would rather lose them on a free than sell. Hakimi got himself a gilded cage.

 

[wera]

time for Marotta to work some magic and find another Hakimi

 

[Il Drago]

Hakimi already is in the top 3 in his position at the age of 22. Finding another Hakimi is easier said than done. And the whole process of replacing Hakimi is becoming even more difficult when you take into consideration our financial situation. You aren't going to reinvest money from Hakimi sale in order to reinforce the team. Despite Hakimi sale, you still have no money to spend.

 

[andrei]

Hakimi has 5m€ net salary at Inter. Not exactly a peanuts contract. Surely less than what PSG offers (8m€ + 2m€ bonus per season), but it's not like it's not a normal salary for a top player who moves to PSG. All of them gets crazy wages.

And this move has nothing to do with the salary, Hakimi hasn't pushed for this move, until he realized we want to sell him.

Really sucks that we can't get even 70m€ guaranteed money while the initial ask was 80m€. It ends up being 65m€ + bonuses reaching to around 70m€. Not a good deal. We won't make even 40m€ plusvalenza with this sale.

Maybe Hakimi hasn't push explicitly for a move, but I supposed he liked from the start the idea of PSG. The salary, his wife (vintage pussy as someone here labeled her) spending much time in Paris, already knows the language.
I don't know why, but I never had the impression Hakimi would stay here long time (5-7 years). Still 1 year is only 1 year.

 

[Materazzi_23]

For me it was already unexpected we even got Hakimi last year, he will become the best RWB in the coming 10 years. Losing him after one year only because we need the money feels really as a hard lost. Because of the money we will get for him but surely because the problem we face now about replacing him. It will always be a downgrade no mather what. I just hope we don't spend a lot of money on someone like Lazzari or f*ckin Dumfries.

I'd rather get Mazraoui from Ajax for cheap. Good technical RB and surely can play as a RWB. Although he had some downfall and injuries.(he is replaced by a 18 year old youthproduct). He was immense in that CL year where Ajax dominated Europe.

 

[andrei]

Hakimi already is in the top 3 in his position at the age of 22. Finding another Hakimi is easier said than done. And the whole process of replacing Hakimi is becoming even more difficult when you take into consideration our financial situation. You aren't going to reinvest money from Hakimi sale in order to reinforce the team. Despite Hakimi sale, you still have no money to spend.

Theoretically could be the Pogba situation. He was in the top 3 position at 23yo when Juventus sold him. And they never replaced them. It is very difficult. But they invested the money and build an overall better squad (they played the CL final after 2 years).

The problem is, because we are in a such dreadful financial situation, we cannot invest the money.

 

[Harpsabu]

Am I right in saying that what we spent on dalbert plus lazaro equals what we spent on hakimi? Fucking pain. Here we go again with another roulette wheel of shit

 

[PHM1605]

I'd rather get Mazraoui from Ajax for cheap. Good technical RB and surely can play as a RWB. Although he had some downfall and injuries.(he is replaced by a 18 year old youthproduct). He was immense in that CL year where Ajax dominated Europe.

That word alone is sufficient to cross his name out. Sensi alone is more than enough. No matter that you have the talent of Ronaldo, it is useless if you can show only on the armchair.

You can argue "gamble"...but at the time we are selling the best RWB for cashflow we should not gamble.

 

[wera]

Hakimi already is in the top 3 in his position at the age of 22. Finding another Hakimi is easier said than done. And the whole process of replacing Hakimi is becoming even more difficult when you take into consideration our financial situation. You aren't going to reinvest money from Hakimi sale in order to reinforce the team. Despite Hakimi sale, you still have no money to spend.

I know all that. I also know that the media will EAT the new Hakimi even tho Hakimi himself was not yet as great as some people saw him.

I'm gonna miss the pace, but pace is not everything. Not sure if I want Lazzarri

 

[rfU]

Not sure what all the fuss is about. Losing our 7-8th most important player for 70M sounds like a W to me. If we can replace Hakimi with a RB that can cross and a decent LWB (Lazzarri and Kostic rumored) I won't lose sleep over it.

 

[PHM1605]

Not sure what all the fuss is about. Losing our 7-8th most important player for 70M sounds like a W to me. If we can replace Hakimi with a RB that can cross and a decent LWB (Lazzarri and Kostic rumored) I won't lose sleep over it.

Hakimi is simply the hardest (if not impossible) to replace. We can find a MC, a DC, or striker everywhere with same quality. But not a right wingback.

RWB is so rare that EVERYONE I could think of is a massive downgrade. If you argue otherwise, name me an adequate replacement? (Lazzari...lol, he is closer to Florenzi or Zappacosta than Hakimi)

 

[rfU]

Hakimi is simply the hardest (if not impossible) to replace. We can find a MC, a DC, or striker everywhere with same quality. But not a right wingback.

RWB is so rare that EVERYONE I could think of is a massive downgrade. If you argue otherwise, name me an adequate replacement? (Lazzari...lol, he is closer to Florenzi or Zappacosta than Hakimi)

Every match day I'd come on here and read paragraphs on how Hakimi can't dribble, has a low IQ, can't pass, can't cross, etc Now he's world class / irreplaceable lol

One on one, sure Hakimi is levels above Lazzari but I'd rather have a player who fits our team/tactics according to Inzaghi's needs, that's far more important. It's 11 v 11 after all.

 

[Il Drago]

Not sure what all the fuss is about. Losing our 7-8th most important player for 70M sounds like a W to me. If we can replace Hakimi with a RB that can cross and a decent LWB (Lazzarri and Kostic rumored) I won't lose sleep over it.

7-8th? Definitely not. We don't know how things are going to be under Inzaghi but under Conte Hakimi was the second most important player for our attacking game. Only Lukaku was more important.

And no thanks to Lazzari. He only has speed and decent crossing. Shit in defence and even his finishing is nothing special. There are much better options if we're willing to spend 20m+.

 

[YoramG]

7-8th? Definitely not. We don't know how things are going to be under Inzaghi but under Conte Hakimi was the second most important player for our attacking game. Only Lukaku was more important.

And no thanks to Lazzari. He only has speed and decent crossing. Shit in defence and even his finishing is nothing special. There are much better options if we're willing to spend 20m+.

As far as I know from having watched Lazio, the bulk of our attacking threat will likely switch from being the wings to being through the two mezzalas, whoever they're going to be. It's also why I'm expecting another signing ala DvdB on loan to really shore up our options in the middle of the pitch.

If we're spending any money, I'd really rather not deal with Lotito especially after we robbed Inzaghi off of him. He'll ask 25m for Lazzari who is worth about 15m, and then turn that money around to buy Kostic.

And Hakimi was definitely top 3 important attacking player. Lukaku, Hakimi, Barella.

 

[crzdcolombian]

7-8th? Definitely not. We don't know how things are going to be under Inzaghi but under Conte Hakimi was the second most important player for our attacking game. Only Lukaku was more important.

And no thanks to Lazzari. He only has speed and decent crossing. Shit in defence and even his finishing is nothing special. There are much better options if we're willing to spend 20m+.

Age and potential matters

He is better than Bastoni and has more potential than De Vrij and Skiniar ….

He is not as good or important as Lukaku or Barella. Tho his potential is only rivaled by Barella. I’d say he is 3rd most important player. 4th if you rate Bastoni or Lautaro above him

Lautaro I want gone since he only ever cares about a transfer out of here or a new contract. That is the easiest lost. The best lost of a player who can bring us actual money would be De Vrij because of his age. But it would be him + another player

Lautaro or Hakimi + bench trash should be enough for the 100 million we are after

 

[qb4ever_2k]

As far as I know from having watched Lazio, the bulk of our attacking threat will likely switch from being the wings to being through the two mezzalas, whoever they're going to be. It's also why I'm expecting another signing ala DvdB on loan to really shore up our options in the middle of the pitch.

If we're spending any money, I'd really rather not deal with Lotito especially after we robbed Inzaghi off of him. He'll ask 25m for Lazzari who is worth about 15m, and then turn that money around to buy Kostic.

And Hakimi was definitely top 3 important attacking player. Lukaku, Hakimi, Barella.

I disagree, Hakimi is less important than Brozovic and at least one of our back 3.