This is not addressed to any single member in particular and just for the record I am not advocating we spend €40m on Scamacca.
I don't mean to be a dick but if you honestly can't see the clear skill difference between the two, you're either blind or simply haven't watched either of them enough.
Scamacca has technical ability which Pinamonti clearly does not. This is why some people prefer the notion of Scamacca, because they value the potential of his exceptional technical skill and finesse. Pinamonti on the other hand is much more rugged and is doing pretty well as a physical, scrappy, box-forward - but he lacks that technical ability. It's like comparing Calhanoglu to Gagliardini, Dybala to Dzeko, or Cancelo to Dumfries. One is clearly more technically gifted than the other.
Now, in terms of use or overall efficacy, it might be up for debate. Obviously technique doesn't mean everything. Plenty of technically gifted players don't reach their potential because they lack the mentality, the physicality or a good footballing brain.
Pinamonti may end up having a better career than Scamacca if he turns out to be tactically smarter, mentally tougher, of if he can make himself more useful. If you honestly prefer a hard-working, physical, Belotti-type striker like Pinamonti compared to a highly technical-but-still-raw talent like Scamacca, that's fine. Perfectly valid opinion to have.
But for the love of God please stop acting like they're the same kind of player or somehow equivalent in terms of potential or raw components just because of their similar goal stats.