Bologna - Inter (6 Jan 22)

CafeCordoba

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
29,913
Likes
4,063
Favorite Player
Bar, Skr, Bas
10 years of FIF
It would feel just wrong if we didn't have to win Bologna on the pitch, I definitely want to see this match to be played.

Imagine this happens to Juventus or Milan and they're awarded a win this way.
 

PHM1605

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
4,227
Likes
1,247
It would feel just wrong if we didn't have to win Bologna on the pitch, I definitely want to see this match to be played.

Imagine this happens to Juventus or Milan and they're awarded a win this way.
The way Juve was awarded winS was WAY worse. As they were against direct rivals.
 

Glass box

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Feb 3, 2014
Messages
6,264
Likes
1,502
So Bologna pulled a Fonseca and can still lose 0-3
 

thatdude

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
17,827
Likes
3,791
10 years of FIF
FIF Special Ones
Not liking the juju around this whole thing, we are 100% going to have a tough time in this match whenever it’s played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVD

SiamoNoi

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Jul 21, 2012
Messages
1,788
Likes
804
Favorite Player
Cambiasso
if Inter were to win the Scudetto at the end of the season with a forfeited result(s), do you think that would delegitimise winning the Championship?
Yes,100%.

But it's not happening.We will play against them later in the season.
 

Jusef

Primavera
Primavera
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Messages
361
Likes
175
The publication of a lineup is too much of a technicality. But considering how the Lega wants to reaffirm it’s position, I wouldn’t rule out the default win.
 

PHM1605

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
4,227
Likes
1,247
I don't care what Juve did get or did not get. I want us winning fair and square. That keeps us in the moral highground.
I don't share the same opinion. Nothing is unfair here; it was Bologna who skipped the match, not us. They COULD send their Primavera but they didn't.

If the match will be replayed, it would be unfair to us, as we are the away team:

1/ We have been wasting our time of preparation & traveling for a cause not our fault.

2/ We must add one extra match to our upcoming fully-packed schedule. Imagine if FIGC put this match some days before Milano derby, well, you see who is getting the disadvantage.

Fuck gentleman attitude, bro. At the end of the day, Scudetto is all that matters. Every slight advantage counts.
 

Il Drago

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
14,350
Likes
9,947
Favorite Player
Wesley Sneijder
Best Football Poster
Also no one would have sympathy if it was the other way around.

Not only they would show no sympathy but they would actually demand a 3-0 loss for Inter by default.

No one shed a tear when Roma lost 3-0 by default against Verona (match ended up in a draw on the pitch) for putting Diawara on the wrong list.

Milanisti were shamelessly celebrating when a journalist misreported Conte had messed up subs windows of last year derby della Madonnina which would lead to a 3-0 defeat for Inter by default, a game Milan had lost 3-0 on the pitch. A year later Milanisti (who else :lol:) started a Satriano hashtag on twitter demanding a 3-0 loss for Inter by default when they thought Satriano was suspended for the match against Napoli.
 

CafeCordoba

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
29,913
Likes
4,063
Favorite Player
Bar, Skr, Bas
10 years of FIF
I don't share the same opinion. Nothing is unfair here; it was Bologna who skipped the match, not us. They COULD send their Primavera but they didn't.

If the match will be replayed, it would be unfair to us, as we are the away team:

1/ We have been wasting our time of preparation & traveling for a cause not our fault.

2/ We must add one extra match to our upcoming fully-packed schedule. Imagine if FIGC put this match some days before Milano derby, well, you see who is getting the disadvantage.

Fuck gentleman attitude, bro. At the end of the day, Scudetto is all that matters. Every slight advantage counts.
This is just absolute horse shit.

Your attitude is more like Juve, winning no matter what it takes.

I prefer winning on the pitch.
 

PHM1605

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
4,227
Likes
1,247
This is just absolute horse shit.

Your attitude is more like Juve, winning no matter what it takes.

I prefer winning on the pitch.
What did we do wrong to be compared to Juve? You say as if we put a gun on Bologna's head to forbid them from going to their stadium, jesus.

The only absolute horse shit is Hakan will be banned from Lazio match instead of Bologna if this match is delayed :lol: That's what you prefer, right?
 

brakbrak

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
3,176
Likes
1,148
Favorite Player
Christian Vieri
10 years of FIF
I don't share the same opinion. Nothing is unfair here; it was Bologna who skipped the match, not us. They COULD send their Primavera but they didn't.

If the match will be replayed, it would be unfair to us, as we are the away team:

1/ We have been wasting our time of preparation & traveling for a cause not our fault.

2/ We must add one extra match to our upcoming fully-packed schedule. Imagine if FIGC put this match some days before Milano derby, well, you see who is getting the disadvantage.

Fuck gentleman attitude, bro. At the end of the day, Scudetto is all that matters. Every slight advantage counts.
What's your take on it when figc granted Juve a 3-0 because Napoli couldn't play?

Btw, I agree that all I care about is the 3 points.
 

PHM1605

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
4,227
Likes
1,247
What's your take on it when figc granted Juve a 3-0 because Napoli couldn't play?

Btw, I agree that all I care about is the 3 points.
1/ It was at Juve home. We had to travel.

2/ That Juve-Napoli match was before there was a legit rule about the case. Our match is after. It says clearly if there are >13 players available the match should be played.

3/ Napoli wasn't allowed to travel at all while the local rule didn't forbid Bologna Primavera to attend the match. It was their fault to forfeit it.
 

brakbrak

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
3,176
Likes
1,148
Favorite Player
Christian Vieri
10 years of FIF
1/ It was at Juve home. We had to travel.

2/ That Juve-Napoli match was before there was a legit rule about the case. Our match is after. It says clearly if there are >13 players available the match should be played.

3/ Napoli wasn't allowed to travel at all while the local rule didn't forbid Bologna Primavera to attend the match. It was their fault to forfeit it.
1. How is that relevant?

2. That's not true, the rule was obvious even then the match has to be played if more than 13 players are available, here's a link dated to the Juve vs Napoli match stating the rule. I'm guessing the new rule is 13 people including Primaveras

(https://the18.com/en/soccer-news/why-napoli-forfeit-juventus)

3. Bologna was ready to play but ASL ordered them not to play as explained by Marotta as well whereas ADL actually refused to play lol

The situation is chaotic," Marotta told Sky Sport ocal health authorities who decided independently.

"Bologna were ready to play and they suffered the situation from ASL which have taken this decision to protect everyone's health, but clarity is missing. I would limit the ASL's power otherwise, we'll always face similar situations in the future."
 
Top