Can't remember the last 0-0 from Inter tbhKept a clean shit though. It's been ages.
Can't remember the last 0-0 from Inter tbh
Do you mind explaining how we field a formation with two attackers [Podolski next to Icardi] and still have Shaqiri and Kovacic? Not just that, how we somehow do all of this and actually win games? Sure we'd have have a good attack but how exactly would we be able to, you know, not concede, with basically so many players on the pitch who offer next to nothing in terms of defensive work rate? I'm not saying what Mancini did was any right, but at least it made sense, and has brought a result..Our main problem is as always the coach. He failed to put up a good formation. It's sad to see us use 1 attacker and have 1 shot on goal in 45min..
The worst part has to be that people like us, who don't have a coaching licence did not go to coaching school can see it so easily, and someone like Mancini can't. (And please don't tell me that he can, because if he could he would have changed it straight away).
Coaches are for some reason idiots and completley blind to reality. They have their visions and stick to them regardless of the world telling / showing them it's not working.
This game would have been different had he had 2 attackers instead of 1. Perhaps keeping Icardi with Podolski. Also why the fuck are we still playing with Hernanes? He is CRAP, and with Shaq and Kovacic on bench lol...
Anyway there are many other things he could have done better, but fuck it. no-body is litsening.
Do you mind explaining how we field a formation with two attackers [Podolski next to Icardi] and still have Shaqiri and Kovacic? Not just that, how we somehow do all of this and actually win games? Sure we'd have have a good attack but how exactly would we be able to, you know, not concede, with basically so many players on the pitch who offer next to nothing in terms of defensive work rate? I'm not saying what Mancini did was any right, but at least it made sense, and has brought a result..
Why didn't he go with his foot in this situation?
Why didn't he go with his foot in this situation?
Why do you think that this would work?Simple,
Podolski ---- Ikardi
------Shaqiri
---Kova---Medel--Hernanes
Dodo--Vidic--Andreoli--D'Abrosio
/since JJ is suspended and if Rano injured
I dont want to see Campanaro and Guarin as Captain.
Our main problem is as always the coach. He failed to put up a good formation.
Why didn't he go with his foot in this situation?
armchair managers galore... you guys can talk about "tactics" "settling in" or "physical intensity", and those are all valid points.
But I feel the biggest problem in all of this is that we sat back against fucken empoli. it's a mentality issue.
- - - Updated - - -
if you've ever played football, you would know it may be harder to pull off, but it's easier to control the ball that way. kicking a curved cross like that depends a lot on the angle of the foot on the ball and the angle of the ball on the foot. on the other hand, heading it in depends on a much less precise angle because the head has more surface area and is flatter.
we didnt sit back, we were overran in the middle, since they congested the park with 4-3-1-2, and we couldn't get the ball past the half way line. they simply outnumbered us.
sure, sure... same old, same old. "tactics" "4-3-1-2" "mazzarri needs to play 4 man defense" "4-2-3-1" "5-3-6" etc.
our players frankly don't look like they give two shits. we're talking about empoli here. if we had won the match, the same tactical geniuses that are raving about would be saying "mancini battled 4-3-1-2 with width in his attacking wingers, great tactical choice".
did they simply outnumber us or was guarin unable to get the ball out of the back? you think with the "right tactics" he would not have made the same shit long shots or sloppy passes?