- Joined
- Mar 22, 2018
- Messages
- 5,303
- Likes
- 2,738
- Favorite Player
- Lautaro
Those saudis and Marotta - a dream combo.
Thankfully for us Newcastle were in shambles under Ashley so it will take Saudis 2-3 years to attract top players. But then they will probably be just another version of City.Financially desperate teams with good players could be a nice target for saudis in january.
They also have a very cool fanbase.At least they are a big club with history.
After selling Martins and Emre to Newcastle, time for another Inter legend for them. Matias Vecino? Or Gagliardini?
Are they????? If so then the bar for being called a big club is pretty low.At least they are a big club with history.
I thought they won more and more recently, but you're right.Are they????? If so then the bar for being called a big club is pretty low.
Last time they won the top division was 1927
That would be much better than what we are enduring now. Selling young stars as soon as any profit arrived, signing craps just because they are the cheapest, having Mercato with 0€ budget, or even worse, forcing to raise €100m from selling your blood.Serious question:
Would you be happy of any consortium took over Inter like Newcastle, PSG and City? They just pump in money buy every player they want and hope they will win a CL. Look at PSG, they act like it's Football Manager and just buy whoever they want. It doesn't matter if they need the player, how big the name is matter to them. They lost connection with the real world and I can imagine with the fans.
Maybe I'm getting old and nostalgic here but I prefer someone like Moratti who really was attached to the club not some rich sheikh who wants to have a toy and whenever he gets tired he sells the club and the club is in big trouble. Would I want Inter to be competitive and have a healthy financial balance? Off course but I wouldn't want to give the club away to someone who doesn't know the club and don't have any emotion towards the club and just see it as a business. I know most of the owners see their club that way but I can't really explain it but it gives me the chills to see more and more clubs getting taking over by consortium's who are only sitting there for themselves and no one else. I guess this is the ''modern football'' way but I still don't like it.
And yes you have exceptions of owners who in time get attached to the club and try to upgrade the Youth Academy and giving back to the community etc, but those are exceptions and not the standard. Just wondering how everyone feels about this.
They can start by signing Sanchez, Vidal and Sensi in January.A series of interesting articles regarding the Saudi group buying Newcastle in the Guardian today. The paper says that they could spend around 150M in the next transfer. At least the toon army are happy.
I agree with you but sadly the period of Italian sugar daddies is over. Before taking the loan from Oaktree, Inter offered the chance to Leonardo Del Vecchio, a weathy Italian businessman and Interista, the chance to make a 200m investment which could lead to him taking the control of the club in time. He immediately refused. Just look at the owners of the other Italian top clubs.Serious question:
Would you be happy of any consortium took over Inter like Newcastle, PSG and City? They just pump in money buy every player they want and hope they will win a CL. Look at PSG, they act like it's Football Manager and just buy whoever they want. It doesn't matter if they need the player, how big the name is matter to them. They lost connection with the real world and I can imagine with the fans.
Maybe I'm getting old and nostalgic here but I prefer someone like Moratti who really was attached to the club not some rich sheikh who wants to have a toy and whenever he gets tired he sells the club and the club is in big trouble. Would I want Inter to be competitive and have a healthy financial balance? Off course but I wouldn't want to give the club away to someone who doesn't know the club and don't have any emotion towards the club and just see it as a business. I know most of the owners see their club that way but I can't really explain it but it gives me the chills to see more and more clubs getting taking over by consortium's who are only sitting there for themselves and no one else. I guess this is the ''modern football'' way but I still don't like it.
And yes you have exceptions of owners who in time get attached to the club and try to upgrade the Youth Academy and giving back to the community etc, but those are exceptions and not the standard. Just wondering how everyone feels about this.
The president is nowhere to be seen on the stand
Are they????? If so then the bar for being called a big club is pretty low.
Last time they won the top division was 1927
I would say they are a big club, trophies don't make you a big club. Leeds is also a great example of a big club, in the UK for sure.Maybe not a big club, but just like Leeds, they are a club with a nice history, were competitive, the Tottenham of EPL history.
It's gonna be hard to convince great players to come, so I don't expect them to just become Manchester City overnight. I can see us selling them a player, Brozović for 80mil maybe?
Leeds were in a position of semi-dynasty before Liverpool emerged, even if their trophies won looks underwhelming now.I would say they are a big club, trophies don't make you a big club. Leeds is also a great example of a big club, in the UK for sure.