- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
- Messages
- 16,641
- Likes
- 644
- Favorite Player
- 22IcardiBroHand
- Old username
- DomesticatedPimp
in all honesty that is not as bad as I thought it would be
in all honesty that is not as bad as I thought it would be
Can you explain itin all honesty that is not as bad as I thought it would be
So players do have a control over their future. Would love to see them rejecting all offers and then Stivies face.
If Skriniar or Barella have some balls (I believe they do) they have to push all core players to reject everything.
De vrij - 35
Dimarco - 16
Gagliardini - 10
Vecino - 5
Pinamonti - 16
Vanheusden - 10
Lazaro -8
Sensi - 8
Esposito - 6
Satriano - 8
These are market values, 122 mil approx. I can't believe that we even can not take 50-60 mil for them.
Then Vidal, Sanchez, Rano, Kolarov, this will be a big reduce in salary and room for new players like Dybala.
Besides Ausilio Sold noname guys for millions in the past.
Why we can not do this instead of selling Basto? of caurse Bastoni is easy and quick.
Thats why I wrote less then half from they market values. they worth 122 mill(Transfermarkt) and I was saying 50 mil for them.Vecino is out of contract
Lazaro isnt worth 8
Sensi isnt worth 8
De Vrij isnt worth 35
Gagliardini is absolutely not worth 10
Told ya to prepere for the sale of 2 of Lautaro, Barella and De Vrij.
Haven't we already imposed the repercussions of a settlement agreement to ourselves? Do you think Uefa terms would be worse than 60m profit and 15% wage bill cut every summer? A settlement agreement would be a problem only if we changed ownership. As long as Suning are around, it wouldn't make a difference.I’m seeing reports of that disgusting, forbidden word again, “settlement agreement”.
I don’t understand why the fucking fuck we are the only club in Europe seemingly targeted for compliance in such a manner.
Signing a settlement agreement would send us straight back to 2015. A death sentence. Then again, I believe it might appeal to Suning as a convenient excuse and a way to further justify our downsizing to a Europa League club.
That's one of the things which pisses me off the most about this club. There is no clear explanation about what the hell is going inside this club. Everything looks classified.I’m seeing reports of that disgusting, forbidden word again, “settlement agreement”.
I don’t understand why the fucking fuck we are the only club in Europe seemingly targeted for compliance in such a manner.
Signing a settlement agreement would send us straight back to 2015. A death sentence. Then again, I believe it might appeal to Suning as a convenient excuse and a way to further justify our downsizing to a Europa League club.
No middle east/north africa aka MENA deal. They broadcast it for free on their youtube channel during the season cause they couldn't conclude a deal in time.We published our Q3 financial results today, as @IM21 pointed out. We typically only provide updates for the MediaCo portion of the company.
Revenue is down because of a decrease in corporate sponsorship revenue, as well as Serie A earning lower licensing revenue. Serie A earns an overall revenue from selling their rights, which they then divide up among the clubs. I don't know what they did to make it decrease YoY, but it went down quite a bit.
The improvement over last year is primarily due to matchday revenue (we earned 36M from July through March) and the capital gains (plusvalenza) from Lukaku and Hakimi.
sums up nicely the fucking idiots that run this league and how unaware they are.No middle east/north africa aka MENA deal. They broadcast it for free on their youtube channel during the season cause they couldn't conclude a deal in time.
So that's a big audience the clowns at lega missed out on.
and the worse part is, it could have been worse. They only sealed the aus deal 6 hours before the first game kicked off...sums up nicely the fucking idiots that run this league and how unaware they are.
This according to today’s print edition of Milan-based newspaper Gazzetta dello Sport, who report that the Nerazzurri will report losses of around €120 million for the fiscal year, down from the €246 million reported last time around.
The increase in revenues for the first quarter of the year are a positive sign for the club, and reflect the continued financial effects of last summer’s big money sales of Achraf Hakimi and Romelu Lukaku as well as the return of fans to stadiums.
Despite this overall positive trend, however, the financial situation at the club is still far from stabilized.
The losses from operating costs compared to revenues over the past fiscal year are still forecast to be around €120 million when the club meet about their official reports for the past fiscal year at the end of June.