- Joined
- Jul 11, 2014
- Messages
- 3,444
- Likes
- 1,845
- Favorite Player
- #3, #4


LmfaoIt means we can afford to lower our asking price for Barella from €70m to €55m plus bonuses.
Let's get Bahrain money.
Better than what we have right now, tbh.They aren’t a sugar daddy it’s an alternative investment fund the same type of company as Oaktree and those share many resemblance too Elliot management. They live by high risk investments, they don’t have the sort of liquidity to behave like a sugar daddy… I think you need to look up what this sort of company is.
Their goal is to clean up the club improve it’s market value and sell us on to another investment firm or private owner.
How so?Better than what we have right now, tbh.
I agree totaly with you. Fund is interested only to make money for their investors. That is the base of their exsistence. Every fund is going to suck your blood until the last drop.How so?
I m gonna get a lot of shit for this but considering the circumstances suning has done a splendid fucken job with Inter.....Yes we re losing players every summer and it sucks but fact of the matter is we sold lots of important players slashing our costs and our performance virtually stayed the fucken same...
Like remember when we did a similar thing after the trebble and our performance went to shit pretty much straight away? We re more than 2 year removed from conte and we re imho playing better football and the results are pretty much the same....
The difference between any kind of fund owning us and Suning is non existent.. It s an illusion if you think any fund would wipe out our debt(bonds) and the suning loan(oaktree) does not weigh that much on our financials. Any fund would strive to make this club run on break even and then sell it on so basically the exact same as suning is doing. Only difference is that suning kind of proved that they know what they are doing( leaving it to marotta) while a new owner might fuck it all up.
Our situation only changes if we get a sugar daddy who is rich as fuck and who only wants to win anybody whos in it for a financial gain will run the club just ike suning is running the club...
Yeah you are not wrong. It's basically Zhangs who put all that money to Inter to begin with to get to the high point of winning the Scudetto. External circumstances then destroyed that (COVID and China policy), they couldn't support Inter anymore as much as was planned.How so?
I m gonna get a lot of shit for this but considering the circumstances suning has done a splendid fucken job with Inter.....Yes we re losing players every summer and it sucks but fact of the matter is we sold lots of important players slashing our costs and our performance virtually stayed the fucken same...
Like remember when we did a similar thing after the trebble and our performance went to shit pretty much straight away? We re more than 2 year removed from conte and we re imho playing better football and the results are pretty much the same....
The difference between any kind of fund owning us and Suning is non existent.. It s an illusion if you think any fund would wipe out our debt(bonds) and the suning loan(oaktree) does not weigh that much on our financials. Any fund would strive to make this club run on break even and then sell it on so basically the exact same as suning is doing. Only difference is that suning kind of proved that they know what they are doing( leaving it to marotta) while a new owner might fuck it all up.
Our situation only changes if we get a sugar daddy who is rich as fuck and who only wants to win anybody whos in it for a financial gain will run the club just ike suning is running the club...
Edit: Also yes we re partially in this shit cause of suning... I m talking since the conte hiring...
Better than what we have right now, tbh.
Counter point is it?The grass isn’t always greener but this asset has been a major headache for Suning ever since COVID hit. They’ve done a respectable job given the circumstances but it doesn’t change the fact that owning inter right now is a problem for Suning.
I don’t mind us becoming profitable. It needs to happen anyway. I just hope we make savvy sporting decisions along the way. I don’t need a sugar daddy owner who will make a spectacle trying to sign Mbappe every summer. Just give me an ownership with enough capital who know the right people to put in charge. On that note, I think it’s important that Ausilio stays on and also Zanetti in his ceremonial role. The biggest mistake a new ownership could make is cleaning house. Of course there would be changes in personnel but they need to trust people who know the lay of the land.
It might be their most valuable asset for all I know but it’s expensive and bleeds money year after year.. And the oaktree loan is very significant, especially with the only option seeming to be refinancing it.Counter point is it?
Comparing to the shit show that suning is and their other holdings inter is golden... Like chinese data is hard to find but i m quite sure inter is their most valuable asset... like their both valued around 1 bio to 1.4 bio with the difference that the zhangs own 70% of inter while they hold around 25% of suning....(not entirely accurate as data hard to get)
Also you re pretty much describing thezhangs in the second part of your post... if it was not for that oaktree loan
Also whats enough capital and if the owner injects said capital ito the club how is it not a sugar daddy?
I just want to be clear...The grass isn’t always greener but this asset has been a major headache for Suning ever since COVID hit. They’ve done a respectable job given the circumstances but it doesn’t change the fact that owning inter right now is a problem for Suning.
I don’t mind us becoming profitable. It needs to happen anyway. I just hope we make savvy sporting decisions along the way. I don’t need a sugar daddy owner who will make a spectacle trying to sign Mbappe every summer. Just give me an ownership with enough capital who know the right people to put in charge. On that note, I think it’s important that Ausilio stays on and also Zanetti in his ceremonial role. The biggest mistake a new ownership could make is cleaning house. Of course there would be changes in personnel but they need to trust people who know the lay of the land.
But my point is unless you do get a sugar daddy that is our current situation...... Like a new owner would have to invest like 50mio per year in order to keep us afloat without generating plusvalenza from players sales....( or inject some 200 mio on top of the buying price)It might be their most valuable asset for all I know but it’s expensive and bleeds money year after year.. And the oaktree loan is very significant, especially with the only option seeming to be refinancing it.
I would say enough capital is not being forced to sell a player every season to make loan payments on our debt. If we sell a player because the offer makes sense and we have a plan for how to reinvest it, sure, but not out of necessity just keep the lights on. Enough capital to be able to front some money for Frattesi so we don’t have to panic sell Brozovic for less than the previously agreed price just to close the deal. Right now we have 0 liquidity.
Buckle up!A key matter for Inter has been to ensure that financial losses fall within the limits allowed for by UEFA’s Financial Fair Play regulations.
The club have successfully met the terms of their settlement agreement with European football’s governing body. But that is only the case for the most recent fiscal year.
UEFA have been rolling out retooled Financial Fair Play regulations over a period of five years, beginning in 2021. The governing body have gradually lowered the amount of losses that clubs can record over that period.
And so for the most recent set of accounts, Inter fell within the terms of their settlement agreement. €85 million in losses was acceptable per the terms of the agreement for the fiscal year ending in 2023.
But for the 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26 sets of accounts, things will be difficult. Over that three-year period, the total losses cannot exceed €60 million.
And starting with the next set of accounts, losses in a single fiscal year must be below €30 million.
Yeah it's gonna be tough. Zhangs or new owners need to recapitalize OR we sell more and more assets and throw ourselves into a death spiral. Good thing for this fiscal year is we have 132m worth of sales, including Onana+Brozovic plusvalenza booked already, among other plusvalenza sales (Pirola, Colidio, Fabbian plusvalenza).