Juventus - Inter (3 Nov 12)

[Howl]

Milito - Palacio

Cassano

Nagatomo - Guarin - Cambiasso - Zanetti

Juan - Samuel - Rano

Handa​

Guarin over gargano, as he's gotten better last few games.. Gargano's been frustrating as hell on the ball

 

[Fapuccino]

Milito - Palacio

Cassano

Nagatomo - Guarin - Cambiasso - Zanetti

Juan - Samuel - Rano

Handa​

Guarin over gargano, as he's gotten better last few games.. Gargano's been frustrating as hell on the ball

yep this is exactly the line up i would put.

 

[Ed.]

Napoli was raped? Theyre the only team that beat Juve in the coppa italia final with a 3-4-3. It doesnt matter what other teams have or what they played. 2 teams could play the same formation but execute them in different ways. My point is that we never do anything with possession, ever. We only score on counter attacks. We couldnt break down Siena ffs. We need to line up 3 fwds vs 3 defenders to drag them out of position as you mentioned. And Juve's midfield is prob the 3rd best in the world after rm and barca. You also forgot Marchisio whom I think is even a better player than Pirlo, whos too immobile imo.

if you watched the game Napoli-Juventus in Serie A, that was a raped.

Marchisio is doubtful. He hasn't played for at least 2 matches. He might not make it to Saturday. That's why I didn't include him. If you have read my previous posts I've mentioned that Marchisio is a nightmare for us. Unfortunately, you just didn't read.

We didn't play with 352 or 343 against Siena. Why do you want to play 3 strikers against 3 defenders when you know that they have 5 midfielder to play with our 4 midfielders? Your logic was that our 2 strikers can't break their 3 defenders because of the number. Now, you put 1 more striker but reduce 1 midfielder. And, I suppose we agree that the main threat of Juventus is not the defence but the midfield. If you can't counter Juve's midfield, you're dead. Why do you worry about our 2 strikers can't break their 3 men defence but you can believe their 2 strikers can break our 3 men defence? Which literally you're saying that Vucinic-Bendtner/Quagliarela/Giovinco/Matri are better than Palacio/Cassano-Milito.

 

[Universe]

Look at you. Staying up till 3am dreaming of 5-0 Turin victories.

I've fucked myself over by leaving both work and assignments til the last minute. Daytime and nighttime have ceased to be relevant and for the past week it's just been sleep time and awake time - regardless of what hour in the day it is. Been waking up at 4 am and doing shit for a while then sleeping from 2PM til dinner, sleeping immediately after dinner, waking up at 10PM to do more work then taking a nap from 2AM to 4 AM then repeating the whole process.

I hate this shit. I'm going to need a full week to gradually set myself back to operating in normal hours.

Speaking of the match though, on the contrary, if we lost, especially heavily, it would put me in an absolutely filthy mood for the entire week. I would be extremely irritable and short tempered (more so than I already am).

 

[Ed.]

Milito - Palacio

Cassano

Nagatomo - Guarin - Cambiasso - Zanetti

Juan - Samuel - Rano

Handa​

Guarin over gargano, as he's gotten better last few games.. Gargano's been frustrating as hell on the ball

yep this is exactly the line up i would put.

That's 3412, not a 343. The 1 is often part of 5 midfielder with a triangle in the center. Unless Cassano drops deeper to pick up ball, that will not be effective. If Cassano tracks down, I'll give it a go. But, Cassano is not even on training today.

 

[Fapuccino]

if you watched the game Napoli-Juventus in Serie A, that was a raped.

Marchisio is doubtful. He hasn't played for at least 2 matches. He might not make it to Saturday. That's why I didn't include him. If you have read my previous posts I've mentioned that Marchisio is a nightmare for us. Unfortunately, you just didn't read.

We didn't play with 352 or 343 against Siena. Why do you want to play 3 strikers against 3 defenders when you know that they have 5 midfielder to play with our 4 midfielders? Your logic was that our 2 strikers can't break their 3 defenders because of the number. Now, you put 1 more striker but reduce 1 midfielder. And, I suppose we agree that the main threat of Juventus is not the defence but the midfield. If you can't counter Juve's midfield, you're dead. Why do you worry about our 2 strikers can't break their 3 men defence but you can believe their 2 strikers can break our 3 men defence? Which literally you're saying that Vucinic-Bendtner/Quagliarela/Giovinco/Matri are better than Palacio/Cassano-Milito.

Them playing w/ 2 strikers does not justify our playing. That is why they were always drawing last season, lack of firepower.

Playing 3-4-3 we can have Palacio drop off as you mentioned, and pressure Pirlo, that way we're almost evenly matched. My point about the strikers was that they're our main asset and we should use it. Even if we do control more possession in midfield, we WONT DO ANYTHING WITH IT. We've always beat teams with only 30% possession its always been our style, even with Bayern back in CL final we had about 30% possession.

Quick transitions are the key to victory, let them make a mistake in the midfield half, and we cattack from the middle of the field. Counter attacks dont always have to start from our own box.


----------------------

It doesnt matter as long as we have 3 strikers. They dont always stick to those positions they move all over the pitch.

 

[Batman]

Bonucci own goal.

Dat goal would be nice.

 

[Ed.]

Them playing w/ 2 strikers does not justify our playing. That is why they were always drawing last season, lack of firepower.

Playing 3-4-3 we can have Palacio drop off as you mentioned, and pressure Pirlo, that way we're almost evenly matched. My point about the strikers was that they're our main asset and we should use it. Even if we do control more possession in midfield, we WONT DO ANYTHING WITH IT. We've always beat teams with only 30% possession its always been our style, even with Bayern back in CL final we had about 30% possession.

Quick transitions are the key to victory, let them make a mistake in the midfield half, and we cattack from the middle of the field. Counter attacks dont always have to start from our own box.


----------------------

It doesnt matter as long as we have 3 strikers. They dont always stick to those positions they move all over the pitch.

You have changed your mind 3x now. Having Palacio to press on Pirlo would be a wrong idea to my opinion because Pirlo would do it the other way, he would drag Palacio and makes Palacio very unuseful. Then we have 2 v 2 in the center. I'm not worried with Pogba, but Vidal would give much headache to Gargano while we need Cuchu to be our center play. You can't deny that Cuchu is our main center point. We've played 3 strikers before and they are not useful, unless we take over the midfield like last night against Sampdoria which will not happen in Turin.

 

[Fapuccino]

You have changed your mind 3x now. Having Palacio to press on Pirlo would be a wrong idea to my opinion because Pirlo would do it the other way, he would drag Palacio and makes Palacio very unuseful. Then we have 2 v 2 in the center. I'm not worried with Pogba, but Vidal would give much headache to Gargano while we need Cuchu to be our center play. You can't deny that Cuchu is our main center point. We've played 3 strikers before and they are not useful, unless we take over the midfield like last night against Sampdoria which will not happen in Turin.

lol change my mind about what, im just saying we need 3 strikers. Palacio should pressure pirlo only when hes in proper position. If pirlo goes too far wide, hell be ineffective, if he goes too far forward, he'll leave the defence exposed. Im also thinking Guarin ahead of gargano, since gargano isnt exactly the best midfielder when hes on the ball, and Guarin showed he's back on form.

 

[junior55]

Here's my formation :



So as u can see no cassano for me. He is great and .... but i think that he is going to be owned by their physical team. Also i strongly believe he is not a big match player. He failed in the derby , failed in euro cup final with italy and this are only the last 2 i can remember.

Milito and Palacio can combine well with each other and i do like Palacio to be closer to the goal such that he can exploit their not so fast cb with through balls.
Guarin can do the dirty job of marking pirlo and supporting attack , while naga should be used at right to mark Asamoah since he can easily beat Zanetti (as he has done with udine, btw i would prefer Perreira at lm to but i know that this won't happen).

 

[Ed.]

lol change my mind about what, im just saying we need 3 strikers. Palacio should pressure pirlo only when hes in proper position. If pirlo goes too far wide, hell be ineffective, if he goes too far forward, he'll leave the defence exposed. Im also thinking Guarin ahead of gargano, since gargano isnt exactly the best midfielder when hes on the ball, and Guarin showed he's back on form.

you said you wanted a 3 strikers. then you changed to 1 in the hole with 2 strikers and said you want Cassano in there. Then you changed to Palacio in there.

Guarin isn't reliable yet. He will have to perform like last night for few matches before playing big games. Gargano is energetic. 1 Cambiasso won't be able to deal with Pogba-Pirlo-Vidal. Guarin is not a perfect DM to anchor the opponent. We often said Cambiasso is too static and it will be a cheesecake for Juve if Guarin-Cambiasso face the 3 midfield. Pirlo will be the main point. He won't follow Palacio but drags Palacio down into our half leaving Cassano-Milito with a coffee break. That's my opinion. Well, more welcome agree to disagree.

 

[Fapuccino]

Here's my formation :

Also i strongly believe he is not a big match player.

Im guessing the semi-final against germany doesnt count.

---------- Post added at 13:29 ---------- Previous post was at 13:26 ----------

you said you wanted a 3 strikers. then you changed to 1 in the hole with 2 strikers and said you want Cassano in there. Then you changed to Palacio in there.

When defending one of them can drop off and mark Pirlo, when attacking they move around wherever there is space.

 

[Pajo]

JuBe will most likely play their usual 3-5-2.

IMO, 3-5-2 will be our formation. Why? Simple.

They have 2 strikers, which are mostly out of form. Probably Vucinic and Giovinco, but it doesn't really matter. 3 defenders are enough to mark them, even though they will have to be careful with the atomic cunt.

The battle will be led in the midfield, and we should at least try to win it Cassano or Palacio and Milito should be able to cause enough trouble in the attack. It will be hard with two forwards, but we have to at least try to overtake and mark their midfielders. Pirlo, Vidal and Marchisio are all great players, by far better than our midfield, and we must play 5 there.

So 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1 or 3-4-3, should not be used IMO. 4-5-1 is far too defensive and for 3-4-1-2 a playmaker is missing, unless Cassano is used there. But in that case, it will be similar to 3-4-3 and the midfield will be overran. Iwould be surprised if Strama chooses Ricky for the AM role, but anything can happen with Strama

 

[Devious]

1, 2 freddys coming for you..

3,4 Milito too so better lock your door

5,6 Cassano will grab your crucifix

7,8 Palacio is on board so gonna stay up late

9,10 Zanetti advices never sleep again

fuck you motha fuckers, we`ll show you halloween bitches :fuckyea:​

 

[Fapuccino]

JuBe will most likely play their usual 3-5-2.

IMO, 3-5-2 will be our formation. Why? Simple.

They have 2 strikers, which are mostly out of form. Probably Vucinic and Giovinco, but it doesn't really matter. 3 defenders are enough to mark them, even though they will have to be careful with the atomic cunt.

The battle will be led in the midfield, and we should at least try to win it Cassano or Palacio and Milito should be able to cause enough trouble in the attack. It will be hard with two forwards, but we have to at least try to overtake and mark their midfielders. Pirlo, Vidal and Marchisio are all great players, by far better than our midfield, and we must play 5 there.

So 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1 or 3-4-3, should not be used IMO. 4-5-1 is far too defensive and for 3-4-1-2 a playmaker is missing, unless Cassano is used there. But in that case, it will be similar to 3-4-3 and the midfield will be overran. Iwould be surprised if Strama chooses Ricky for the AM role, but anything can happen with Strama

midfield will be overran no matter what we do. with 2 strikers the only way we'll score is from a set piece. There is no way Milito and Palacio alone can defeat the best club defence in the world. Counterattacking is what we do best, and a packed midfield is not necessary for it.

Let's not forget what happened in Euro 2012 final. Both italy and spain were possession based teams, and spain overran italy, even though italy insisted on trying to keep possession.

Possession is not necessary to win games, its what you do with it that counts, and at least from what Ive seen, we never do anything with it as we dont have the right personnel to retain possession long enough and then break down a packed defense.

 

[KevinB]

Devious. Post of the year.


---------------------Handanovic-------------------
----------Juan Jesus---Samuel-----Ranocchia------
Zanetti------Gargano---------Cambiasso----Pereira
-----------------Cassano----Palacio---------------
-------------------------Milito--------------------

or

---------------------Handanovic-------------------
----------Juan Jesus---Samuel-----Ranocchia------
Zanetti-----Gargano--Guarin--Cambiasso----Pereira
-------------------------Palacio-------------------
-------------------------Milito--------------------

Predict a 1-2 :closeenough:

Palacio, Cambiasso



Let's Fuck em up! Forza Internazionale!

 

[Devious]

:datass:

 

[Ed.]

Just do it like Mourinho said..

 

[maxpower88]

Cassano - Milito

Alvarez

Nagatomo - Cambiasso - Gargano - Zanetti

Juan - Samuel - Ranocchia

Handanovic​

 

[armendsh]

Inter vs JuBentus "DERBY" ? LOL

Its not called a derby if the opposite team was in Seria B at least one time.