- Joined
- Jun 18, 2005
- Messages
- 14,190
- Likes
- 19
- Favorite Player
- Marotta
- Old username
- Wallace
Forum Supporter
10 years of FIF
so first you said you didnt say it was black and white, then I showed you evidence you said that, then you said ignore that because I also said something else that is completely irrelevant?
What's with your perseverance with black and white?
All I said was "What's wrong with that?", which was a question. Quite frankly, I'm completely confused with the point you're trying to bring with this black and white crap, that's why I ignored it, and I'm gonna ignore it now as well.
Like I said, I really don't give a crap about whatever label you're trying to snap on it, call it black and white, red and blue or whatever you will.
I didn't "neglect" nagatomo or handanovic. I ignored them because they didn't fulfill all the "criteria". You need quality, passion, leadership - to an extent. Rano has quality, passion, and some leadership. Naga lacks quality, but has passion and leadership - you can't be captain from the bench. Handa has quality, but no indication of any leadership, and no passion.
C'mon mate. You didn't even talk about Nagatomo's passion and leadership skills, how is that even *all* the criteria. It's quite funny how you just keep saying Nagatomo lacks quality, Nagatomo lacks quality. I've already said in my last few posts, I don't agree with that, and I'm sure there are a lot more people on this forum who won't agree with that either. Sure Nagatomo had some pretty poor games this season, but Ranocchia hasn't?
And plus, Nagatomo isn't even going to be on the bench, Dodo isn't going to bench him, and D'Ambrosio? Give me a break, please, they won't both bench him at the same time, especially not Dodo after Mancini's in charge.
And as I said this so many times, I disagree with the notion that Handanovic has a complete lack of leadership and passion.
my point is that rano is not necessarily a bad choice and no one is a better choice than him ATM. who gives a shit about hindsight anymore? why can't you read what I say before you reply?
Sure, but I'm actually saying your points that you've provided supporting your arguments are flawed, okay?