Roberto Mancini

[surripere]

Screw Mancini, he bailed on us - again! - two weeks before the season started after a crappy pre season which left the players playing catch up from the off.

 

[Candreva Crosses]

All you fools who wanted this guy out so passionately, hope yous are all happy yous got your wish. 100% this club would not be like this right now had he stayed.

THANKYOU

 

[tanorini]

Mancini is a fool how many times do we have to explain he wanted random players that didn't make any sense instead of saying he won't stay he decided to go do a preseason and didn't even do that professionally the management tried their best to suit his needs and even attempted to renew his contract he said no wtf were they suppose to do now? Its true they messed up by letting him stay that long they should have fired his ass since the beginning. Deboer is the one we fucked it shows how Inter is run internally. Plus those of u saying with mancini we wouldn't do any worse haha same dude who was standing while we got hammered in all but one of our preseasons 6-1 wtf was that?

- - - Updated - - -

Don't forget this sick management and clown mancini got kondogbia and melo these players u guys and I cuss 24/7. they are both fools but to see mancini should have stayed when he clearly bailed like surripere is irrational.

 

[Harpsabu]

Mancini is a fool how many times do we have to explain he wanted random players that didn't make any sense instead of saying he won't stay he decided to go do a preseason and didn't even do that professionally the management tried their best to suit his needs and even attempted to renew his contract he said no wtf were they suppose to do now? Its true they messed up by letting him stay that long they should have fired his ass since the beginning. Deboer is the one we fucked it shows how Inter is run internally. Plus those of u saying with mancini we wouldn't do any worse haha same dude who was standing while we got hammered in all but one of our preseasons 6-1 wtf was that?

How many pre season games did man city win? Pre season results mean NOTHING! Man city had a shocking pre season and started absolutely flying in the league. Milan were brilliant last year in pre season and were shit when the league started.

Dont forget he got Perisic, Miranda, Candreva, Banega the list goes on. How many of these guys was he extemely influential in signing too? We've took one massive step back with him leaving, none of us realised how massive at the time. We are fools.

 

[tanorini]

How many pre season games did man city win? Pre season results mean NOTHING! Man city had a shocking pre season and started absolutely flying in the league. Milan were brilliant last year in pre season and were shit when the league started.

Dont forget he got Perisic, Miranda, Candreva, Banega the list goes on. How many of these guys was he extemely influential in signing too? We've took one massive step back with him leaving, none of us realised how massive at the time. We are fools.

The problem isn't that we lost offcourse its normal and even great to lose in preseasons we did it before the last year and started the league well but its clear he didn't prepare anything in this last preseason, mancini was arguing to get his beloved yaya and other players and suning said so he was arguing instead of preparing the players, it showed early in this season we had no fitness, no going to the United states was not an excuse man city and the teams u mentioned went to china and the united states and they were fit cuz they properly trained while we were in a circus, our managemet should have known the difference is huge between mancini and them and terminated his contract early on. The losses in preseason weren't he problem it's what we saw in terms of prepeartion fitness and the organziation which both mancini staff and the management take blame for. lsing 6-1 two and half weeks before the season is not normal though. Its clear mancini's mind was somewhere else and he wasn't being professonal!

Perisic was his buy 100% . comeon bro we know he isn't all that bad infact this is one of mancini's best points he can attract big players, he didn't get banega lol candreva I wish if we didn't get him infact suning got him for mancini, he's old and he has no resale value and we dould have gotten a much younger and a better player, candreva is not that good. Miranda was his buy true. We realized it firing a coach two weeks before the start was stupid and getting deoer who plays a totally different type of football which the players we have atm will never be able to play was mad. This is mancini's team , it suits him.

- - - Updated - - -

But having mancini who refused to renew his contract and bailed on us was the normal decision infact from my point of view after last season we should have fired him immediately when suning bought he club.

 

[Nyall]

All you fools who wanted this guy out so passionately, hope yous are all happy yous got your wish. 100% this club would not be like this right now had he stayed.

?

This club would be exactly where we are right now, probably even worse because this is basically Mancini's team + JM..

I'm curious though, considering that Mancini ended the last season exactly how we started this season AND our pre-season was absolutely awful and our coach didn't even have the sense to condition the players properly (which was Frank's biggest challenge coming in), how exactly do you suppose that we'd be any better off and not worse than we are now?

 

[Bluenine]

?

This club would be exactly where we are right now, probably even worse because this is basically Mancini's team + JM..

I'm curious though, considering that Mancini ended the last season exactly how we started this season AND our pre-season was absolutely awful and our coach didn't even have the sense to condition the players properly (which was Frank's biggest challenge coming in), how exactly do you suppose that we'd be any better off and not worse than we are now?

Nyall, you are letting your hate for Mancini get the better of you:

1. No, the club wouldn't be exactly where we are now or even worse BECAUSE this is basically Mancini's team and more suited to his style. Also, if Mancini were here, we wouldn't have spent 70m on JM & Gabigol, instead we would have had a top DM and top CB - that was the whole point why he quit.

2. No, Mancini didn't end last season exactly how we started this season. In the last 11 games last season, we got 19 points (as compared to 14 points from first 11 this season). 19 points would put us 3 points behind 3rd place this season.

3. Pre-season conditioning was awful but instead of putting all that blame conveniently on Mancini, don't you think the Euro + Copa America + those needless marketing friendlies in America also had something to do with it?

I know hating Mancini is in fashion, but lets balance the argument here.

 

[magnesium]

our management not patience like chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak who gave his support to Mancini in 3 years.

in first spell , mancini is like had no clue epl , but in 3 year , he win epl with Manchester city, and remember , manchester united still with sir alex.

but our management is retard , not gave support to mancini, even replace him with incompetence coach... remember, city replace him with pellegrini?

yeah , we get another year zero , and only 1% chance get CL spot this year, congrats to mancini haters .

in 5 years after treble era , i never see a manager who made Inter get position in 1st place , even only 2 month..

, i don't care we had negative playing style , but we are still in top 4

 

[Il Drago]

With the 70m spent on JM and Gabigol Mancio had asked for 3 players. Vermaelen, Toure and Reus. That was reported on the media the day he left. Vermaelen is already on his way back to Barcelona after his failed loan spell at Roma. Toure is finished. And Reus hasn't played a single game in this season because of injury. So no.We wouldn't get a top DM and a top CB. If they had listened to Mancini things would be similar to how they are now, if not worse. Mancini is to blame for this situation almost as much as the management .

 

[magnesium]

With the 70m spent on JM and Gabigol Mancio had asked for 3 players. Vermaelen, Toure and Reus. That was reported on the media the day he left. Vermaelen is already on his way back to Barcelona after his failed loan spell at Roma. Toure is finished. And Reus hasn't played a single game in this season because of injury. So no.We wouldn't get a top DM and a top CB. If they had listened to Mancini things would be similar to how they are now, if not worse. Mancini is to blame for this situation almost as much as the management .

this team is mancini made for serie a , i think he know what the best for inter , so fans need patience , except we get bottom table with mancini.

why our management retard , when the team made by mancini , no one coach this team except mancini.

and our fans and management still believe De Boer can reach CL place with Mancini team.

even guardiola say he need many player to make manchester city get back to 1st place , like john stones.

 

[bandiera]

I wasn't sold on Mancini leaving just a few weeks before the beginning of the season, but in no way is our current situation inherent to not having Mancini as our manager.

 

[Adriano@10]

Fuck mancini the guy had 1.5 season time and two fucken transfer windows in which he got what he wanted and yet he did not manage to implement a playing style. We would be off just as bad with mancini in charge. Also even if mancini would have gotten the players he wanted his succes rate in transfers was very fucken low only perisic made it. Most of the others were gona after only half a season because again mancini has no vision and the rest is baisicaly melo so again fuck mancini. It s his clueless and arogant ass and our management who are mostly to blame for our current situation.

 

[Batman]

Fuck mancini the guy had 1.5 season time and two fucken transfer windows in which he got what he wanted and yet he did not manage to implement a playing style. We would be off just as bad with mancini in charge. Also even if mancini would have gotten the players he wanted his succes rate in transfers was very fucken low only perisic made it. Most of the others were gona after only half a season because again mancini has no vision and the rest is baisicaly melo so again fuck mancini. It s his clueless and arogant ass and our management who are mostly to blame for our current situation.

He got 4 transfer windows and a half if you count the last one (Candreva, Erkin and Ansaldi all came when he was still here)

 

[Harpsabu]

?

This club would be exactly where we are right now, probably even worse because this is basically Mancini's team + JM..

I'm curious though, considering that Mancini ended the last season exactly how we started this season AND our pre-season was absolutely awful and our coach didn't even have the sense to condition the players properly (which was Frank's biggest challenge coming in), how exactly do you suppose that we'd be any better off and not worse than we are now?

I think Bluenine has pretty much summed up everything that needed to be said,
But i'd just like to add, Mancini had strengthened where we were weak last season for his system, a creative mid in Banega, a RW in Candreva and a wing back Ansaldi. This would have made his system and team even stronger as we know, this is where we were lacking last season.

Also, IL drago, there are tons of shit reported in the media that isn't true, you know this. Rumor was he left because they didnt accept Icardi offer, now because he didnt want gabigoal, now what you've reported. We don't know for sure.

Also, the dressing room is in chaos at the minute. There was a spark last year with Jovetic and Ljaic at christmas, it lasted about one day and Mancini stamped it out. He can control this dressing room and right now it's all over the place. We mightn't be sitting top of the league, but if Mancio was still here I would put my house on it that we WOULD NOT be in this situation.

Offcourse the management didn't help matters bringing in such a different coach in FDB, but that was a consequence of him leaving.

Adriano, only Perisic made it? Compare this team with the team Mancini had when he took over and tell me who did / didnt make it. He done some changing yes, but that is an exaggeration.

 

[Joker]

wtf we're still talking about this clueless coach...he suck, end of story.

 

[M.Adnan]

I highly doubt that Banega was Mancini's specific request, and if so, he would bench him after 4 games and sell him in January. Banega is no way a Mancini type of midfielder. Mancini has praised many new signings before changing his opinion when he sees that they can't defend like he wants.

The management probably just saw that Banega for free was too good not to sign, regardless of Mancini's opinion. In fact, signing Banega and chasing J.Mario instead of Toure is probably what made Mancini weep and quit.

 

[Il Drago]

Also, IL drago, there are tons of shit reported in the media that isn't true, you know this. Rumor was he left because they didnt accept Icardi offer, now because he didnt want gabigoal, now what you've reported. We don't know for sure.

Of course there are many bs rumours and we don't know what to believe. But Bluenine said we would definitely get a top DM and a top CB if Mancini had stayed. I assumed he was basing that on rumours from the media, so i decided to respond to him accordingly.

 

[Nyall]

1. No, the club wouldn't be exactly where we are now or even worse BECAUSE this is basically Mancini's team and more suited to his style. Also, if Mancini were here, we wouldn't have spent 70m on JM & Gabigol, instead we would have had a top DM and top CB - that was the whole point why he quit.

But you and I, both know Mancini very well. We both know who Mancini truly wanted for this team, saying he wanted a top DM doesn't mean a lot when if it were up to him we would have gotten an aging Yaya Toure above everything else and also, us signing that new CB was contingent on the fact that we would have sold Murillo.

2. No, Mancini didn't end last season exactly how we started this season. In the last 11 games last season, we got 19 points (as compared to 14 points from first 11 this season). 19 points would put us 3 points behind 3rd place this season.

In his last 11 games we got 16 points. And in the last 22 games under him we obtained 28 points. Same exact form.

3. Pre-season conditioning was awful but instead of putting all that blame conveniently on Mancini, don't you think the Euro + Copa America + those needless marketing friendlies in America also had something to do with it?

Why was this only Inter problem though, when so many other clubs went through that exact same thing and even started the season before we did? Shouldn't those teams who were handing our asses to us in the US be struggling for fitness too?

 

[Adriano@10]

Also, the dressing room is in chaos at the minute. There was a spark last year with Jovetic and Ljaic at christmas, it lasted about
Adriano, only Perisic made it? Compare this team with the team Mancini had when he took over and tell me who did / didnt make it. He done some changing yes, but that is an exaggeration.

Where should i start? Shaqiri, podolski, telles, melo, eder, santon, jovetic, Ljajic and i would put erkin on ther too pretty sure i even forgot some. Most of them were reported to be mancini requests and most of them are alredy gone again or never came close to expectations. These are 9 fucking players in 1.5 year i dont know a manager with a worse track record. And dont give me we also signed miranda and murillo under him coz both deals were done bevore mancini joined us.

Yes this team is better then mancini this does not change the fact that most of his transfers turned out horrible. I mean the idiot requested eder so to help us score more when everybody saw that the forward line was not the problem.

Edit: Forgot about brozo and i would count him as a success but i also forgot kondo who turned out terrible. Fact is even if you contribute the signing of Murillo, Miranda, Banega, J mario and Candreva to Mancini and count them as a success his success rate would still be terrible. I mean he would be at 18 signings of which 7 turned out to be good. Thats under fucking 40% if thats not terrible then i dont know.

 

[surripere]

Mancini sucked balls. Good riddance. Its a shame he couldn't take all those shitty signings with him.