Heralding the Oil states as some significant place to live compared to the western nations (because you saw a woman taking care of the toilets) is such a reductive, unsound conclusion when the two have widely different challenges in terms of the people living there. If you took away the general income from oil money (which I know, is a very hypothetical scenario) you'd literally have some of the worst places to live on earth.
I was stating that the western countries use a lot of their annual BNP to take care of the worst-off people within their borders (such as welfare), which could've been used to raise the general standard of living or, I dunno', modernize toilet facilities or infrastructure.
The Oil states don't do that or don't have to do that, and instead have very poor conditions for most of their labor force, bordering on slavery-like for some. What you see what you praise Riyadh or Dubai is what you see as a relatively rich foreigner staying in a good hotel, not how it is for the whole of the population.
Pointing to migrants or immigrants exclusively probably was more distracting from the broader point than intended.
Why are you guys so defensive and introduce new comparing points as if that was my intention at all.
Oh x country is is rich because of y, and without y it wouldn't be. I can point to ten gazillion reasons why western europe has those hundreds year old fancy buildings - and they were built by both, unethical "sourcing" of materials and labor. "Worst place to live on earth", seems quite an exaggeration, every country has its own country specific advantage that it leverages to get a competitive edge.. oh remove this from europe see how it is, oh remove that from china see how it gets.
Again, I do not want to seem offensive but I do not think you understand how much it would cost to modernize some of this stuff.. pay terminals is not some gov led initiative that costs billions.. merchants/startups jointly can lead to alot of adoption, digitally able people would work too.. making toilet for free is not a billion dollar initiative.. Brugges has 8 million tourists yearly, they can have taxes to mantain their toilettes. How much do you think cleaning a toilet costs? Its not a trade off between welfare and 50 cents for toilet.
Again, every big city has its good parts and bad parts, london labor does not live in kensington. But obviously you havent been to north/east/south london, or even past w1, nor in paris, nor in brussels..
My overarching point is that, private and publci sector in europe are asleep, and you guys are just getting defensive and starting what aboutism.. its eerily similar to balkans, oh we might be shit but 1,500 years go we invented the fork, and we have a guy in a horse that was smart, and we are cradle of civilization.
Last point, UK had none of the issues that western europe, particularly belgium has.