- Joined
- Mar 7, 2004
- Messages
- 35,416
- Likes
- 14,734
- Favorite Player
- Toro, Barella
10 years of FIF
That's fucking awful if we cannot sign these guys for 3-year deals.
If this is true, it's really interesting these extensions are linked with Oaktree loan deal. It's as if the club is going to change management when the loan expires.According to CdS, Marotta and Ausilio want to sign 3-year contract while Zhang only wants 2 (that is when their Oaktree loan expires)
If that is true, well, does anyone still think Suning cares for Inter?
It definitely sparks uncertainty.If this is true, it's really interesting these extensions are linked with Oaktree loan deal. It's as if the club is going to change management when the loan expires.
It definitely sparks uncertainty.
But we did sign extensions for players past that date, so it's odd.
The point is nobody knows. Suning don't know whether Oaktree wants the old management or not. While Oaktree aren't sure Suning pay their loan or just give Inter to them -> obviously they can't join our head arrangement atm.I think that's a different matter as these directors play in a different role in this organization. Players are merely just pawns, employees, assets. Directors run the show so I kind of get it but also, I don't get it. I mean, if the deal is 3 years but Oaktree takes control after 2 years, they don't want these guys, they just fucking sack them?
Or is it the Oaktree using veto in the board? Still don't get it as our management trio is one of the best in the business. Can't hurt any club to have those three in the club. Maybe Marotta's role as CEO is bugging them, Marotta requiring too much power for Oaktree's liking?
Can't really see any reason not to sing 3 year deal other than Oaktree board members blocking that for some reason.
I had read Oaktree do have the right of veto in every decision. We should also remember this isn't only about the sporting section (Marotta and Ausilio). It's also about the corporate section (Antonello). If we have a change of ownership Antonello is probably going to be the first to go as the new owners would like to bring their own guy as CEO.I think that's a different matter as these directors play in a different role in this organization. Players are merely just pawns, employees, assets. Directors run the show so I kind of get it but also, I don't get it. I mean, if the deal is 3 years but Oaktree takes control after 2 years, they don't want these guys, they just fucking sack them?
Or is it the Oaktree using veto in the board? Still don't get it as our management trio is one of the best in the business. Can't hurt any club to have those three in the club. Maybe Marotta's role as CEO is bugging them, Marotta requiring too much power for Oaktree's liking?
Can't really see any reason not to sing 3 year deal other than Oaktree board members blocking that for some reason.
The only thing certain is that their long-term commitment statement was bullshit, if that rumor is true.
Guess we'll all get petroleum jelly for Christmas! Only if you buy coins from Socio.They've been openly trying to sell Inter for how long now and still you now realise that the commitment statement was bullshit? They are lubing the fans in before they start fucking them over
If not, will you get fucked without the jelly?Guess we'll all get petroleum jelly for Christmas! Only if you buy coins from Socio.
We do not have a daily dialog, but we are in touch very often.
I do not think the CCP is into installing phones in their gulags or re-education centres.Enough said.
Different political systems, culture and language compared to the the west/anglo/English speaking world.why is the China so closed country? lack of information tells what happened with China economy, what happen with Suning so far, maybe China lack capability to create any competent journalist or what?