Lazaro's book value is 11M, so we would actually be taking a capital loss just so he GTFO.
If it's a loan with an obligation to buy, actually we would get capital gain from this as Lazaro's net value would be around 5.5m if the option gets triggered at the end of the season.Lazaro's book value is 11M, so we would actually be taking a capital loss just so he GTFO.
It's only 1.5m gross, but yeah, more saving.His wage is 4.5m gross IIRC, so we will end up saving 2m and some headaches.
I think you have to treat the accounting for a loan + an obligation as an outright sale, given that the outcome is already determined. I had read this in the official FFP handbook at some point.If it's a loan with an obligation to buy, actually we would get capital gain from this as Lazaro's net value would be around 5.5m if the option gets triggered at the end of the season.
It's only 1.5m gross, but yeah, more saving.
So good guy Rui Costa didn't forget the most likely under-the-table deal.
It'd be funny to see what Sporting may came up with this again.
It's only 1.5m gross, but yeah, more saving.
So good guy Rui Costa didn't forget the most likely under-the-table deal.
It'd be funny to see what Sporting may came up with this again.
Ah thanks for the info. I think although even it's an outright sale, if it gets registered on the same fiscal year, in this case at the of the season, the player value is already amortized to a capital gain value. Btw, I'm only referring to Inter media.co's financial report last season, which included Politano and Candreva.I think you have to treat the accounting for a loan + an obligation as an outright sale, given that the outcome is already determined. I had read this in the official FFP handbook at some point.
I think it's higher too but no source to confirm this. Better wait for Gds wage list.No one is making 1.5m gross at Inter except the primavera players.
Conte wanted Lazaro, that was really bad bussines.I think Lazaro's salary is around 1.5m€ net maybe.
9m€ is acceptable, we amortize him yet one time, this season but then we get that money. Failed transfer indeed so this sale is just bare minimum, nothing to be proud of for Marotta and Ausilio.
Yes, not bad. Because those "worthless assets" were pretty toxic. Next year come off the books Vidal, Perisic and Vecino. All of them with pretty big salaries. More than what they provide on the pitch.We have been loaning Lazaro and losing 5.5m every year on amortisation. So in this particular case, fuck accounting. This 9m feels like 100% profit.
Also, Inter have made such a huge plusvalenza this summer that it makes sense to use some of that to write off some worthless assets at the same time eg Mario, Nainggolan, Lazaro, etc. We are cleaning house.
Lazaro was as useless for us as the expired condom in the wallet of the average FIFer, desperately waiting for the hook up that never happened