- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 32,890
- Likes
- 11,802
- Favorite Player
- Bea Arthur
10 years of FIF
Most Diverse Poster
Really I liked all 3 of them. I feel they are unfairly crapped on. Star Wars was the same exact movie as the 1st movie yet everyone loves it. Star Trek have all had Better villains with reasons they are bad. Star Wars they are evil because we need someone evil. Eric Bana was awesome in the 1st one
I liked the first 2 enough to enjoy them once and then forget about him. Even tho they are very unStarTrekkish, full of plotholes and have many cliches, like a 1 on 1 battle at the end.
Star trek beyond feels more like a ST should be, but it also feels like one of the more shittier episodes. Also, nothing in it is original. Even the *bees/swarm* was done before in ST.
I don't understand what are they trying to do here - trekkis are mad because these movies are full of references and callbacks to the old Star Treks, but nothing new happens and some actors are underperforming (actress playing uhura :S)...while others are saying all 3 movies have certain formulas they follow, so it has become all predictable in the 3rd one.
Ugh, and the dialogue. Simon Pegg isn't as funny as he thinks he is.