- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 998
- Likes
- 1,332
I think the objective of using wage reduction as the variable is a bit inaccurate, as we just extend Brozovic, Martinez, Barella & Bastoni's contract to up 80% (actually Martinez is having a 140% wage increase).Does this put us in line of the parameters expected (e.g. 20% wage reduction, +70m plusvalenza)?
The annual cost might be a better representation as it sums up the wage gross and the player's annual amortization.
So, yes, we are in line with that objective. As the simulation table above, we might have around ~20m available including hypothetically Dybala's cost to cover the missing position.
Regarding the plusvalenza, I'm not sure why this would be the objective since I thought we already accumulate a hefty amount in recent seasons even with FFP is loosened up.
There is also reporting we need a €70m transfer net.
It remains to be seen as these two can potentially give different paths on how we move in the transfer market imo.
If plusvalenza is the objective, so the main candidate would be De Vrij and Martinez. If it's transfer net, then...basically the same, we will lose a good player, but who knows Ausilio might use his trick again by inflating those unused players again.
Great work as always, @pier
Selling Pinamonti, de Vrij, and Sensi for capital gains is Marotta's most important task this summer to "correct" the budget that Suning has imposed. No reason we should walk away with less than net gains of 40M from them.
Scenario 1 is a bit more realistic valuation (in my opinion) and the second one is what we all hope for.