Ok maybe scrap Simic out of that list, but the rest have put in over 100 appearances for us, so I think we should be pretty grateful for that.
You failed to comment on my thoughts of the shitty signings by Facchetti, what is your opinion on that subject?
So if someone have 100 appearances for some club that makes him a legend?
Bad signings<Good signings---Fachetti era
How do you know with which transfers he was involved more, and with which he was involved less ?
Maybe Giacinto was involved with all the bad transfers, not with good ones. I'm not sure, but it seems to me you are. (??)
OK, so it's by actiend that we made so many good moves when he was on board. So much cheap and quality singings in such a shot period?
How I know? I don't. I know that after he's gone we didn't make two quality moves on transfer market and that's a fact.
R.Carlos was good as lw at inter but he wanted to play at lb and inter felt he was better as a lw. That's why he left. The club would have liked to keep him.
Bergkamp had nothing to do with inter. He couldn't come to grips with the italian culture. He would have failed anywhere in Italy.
Seedorf was inconsistent at madrid as well. He has also had his up and down campaigns at milan.
Pirlo was played in a different position where he was poor. He still sucks as a amc and can only play as a deep playmaker.
If those talents were so great they would have succeeded at another club but yet none of them have done a thing.
R.Carlos wants to be left back and Inter didn't alow him to play that role. That's absurd. Moratti wanted old star Zamorano, he have some fetish for old washed up players. Anyone remember Veron and Batistuta?
Bergkamp is a storry that I can acept.
Seedorf was midllefield general and we gave him for Guly, neough said. Don't talk about his incostitency please, he was UEFA Champions League Best Midfielder: 2006-07.
Pirlo, no coment.
Disagree. Motta offers different abilities than any of the named players and although him alone won't change much, he is a clear step forward. We all know our midfield has been a problem and Motta can only help it get better unless something happens to him. Chivu is ok as a midfielder, nothing more. Motta > Chivu in midfield.
He's very small step forward. Our midlefielers can't run fast and they can't dictate tempo, they can't dribble and they can't give good long balls. Motta can't do that stuff either. He can jump, he can run and he can shoot the ball, just like Stanković, Muntari and Vieira. Maybe he have little more flair but we need much much more.
I agree that he can help but we need more, we need Fabregas type of middlefieler.
These are assumptions. Saying it was a mistake to buy Milito is not fair at this point. Most probably he will score lots of goals for us.
Again, all assumptions. Plus saying it was as easy as "letting Eto'o go to Man U and then get more money for Ibra" is strange. We have no guarantees that Man U or City would go for him and Barcelona would probably never have paid 75-80m cash for Ibra. Eto'o and Milito are both great purchases.
Of course that's assumptions but valid assumptions. I say that mistake was to buy Eto'o when we have Milito. And I believe that Milito will score a lot of goals for us. I am sure that he would score even more with Cassao like his partner and with good no10 behind him.
Barcelona would probably never have paid 75-80m cash for Ibra.
Is that assumption or what? C.Ronaldo is 96 , Kaka 66 and Ibra isn't 75?
As others have said, the President doesn't run everything alone. And saying Facchetti > Moratti serves no purpose, since Giacinto is not an option anymore.
I agree but that Moratti (I really adore him for everything he has done in a past and for his love and everythin) but that man is jinxed or something.
And believe me, he can be gentlemen and everything but he's oil baron. He don't knows football very well, Fachetti was mastermind for game comparing with Moratti.