At least we are trying, respectively fooling us fans to think thatgds - Fiorentina rejected Inter's 50M offer for Vlahovic.
Unrelated comment but I think if we signed Atalanta's scouts, our track record would remain the same and Atalanta's track record would remain the same with respect to recruitment. My impression when it comes to clubs like Udinese and Atalanta is that the system matters more than the individual scouting talent.Then just fire the current scouts and hire ones working for Atalanta. Doubling their salary. Surely won't cost more than 5m.
according to cds he's still a priority and Inter will offer 13-15M for him.i still don't understand a thing. We have 50-60M to invest to get 2 strikers, but what about dummfries?
It's simple, before the start of the transfer window, Zhang set a goal make 80 million in sales and cut salary, that is, we started the transfer window from minus fucking 110 million euros, since we owed Real Madrid 30 for the Hakimi, in such a situation everyone was counting on the genius of Marotta, that we would not only lose in quality, but also strengthen ... Which is an almost impossible task! At the time of the sale of Hakimi, we have minus 40m, that's a lot of money to cover it with the sale of Vecino and the youngster team players, and also don't forget that to fulfill the task number 2 we need to pay the retainers to Conte, Mario, Nainggolan and Vidal.What makes you say that? Nowhere is said how much of Lautaro's possible sale price would be allocated for the replacement. Lukaku was sold for 115m€ and our budget for transfers according to the media is around 55m€. Hakimi money was banked 100%.
I'd definitely try to persuade Zhangs to allow us to spend to get Vlahovic, even if it means spending extra 10-15m€. A risky bet but I don't think we are in a position to play it "safe" after selling Lukaku which was the opposite of playing safe.
I mean, investing in Zapata is playing it safe, he will provide goals but nothing special, nothing long-term. Resale value is 0. I can see directors going for that direction to kind of save their asses and secure the top4 for the next season but it won't give us the Scudetto. Vlahovic won't give us the Scudetto either but gives us options for the future. His value goes even higher after CL performances (I doubt he would flop hard, we have still good team around him). We might sell him high (and build around Lautaro) or sell Lautaro next summer and build around Vlahovic (though Zhang is then "why not both"). Would give some hope and continuity for this club's attack.
Getting Zapata now, then selling Lautaro next summer and we have no young striker to build our future attack around. We need to buy that player next summer and then it takes time for the guy to gel into the team and the club and we've wasted a year of this gelling process.
Da f*ck? How much does Fiorentina want for him? 50M is a pretty good deal for them.gds - Fiorentina rejected Inter's 50M offer for Vlahovic.
They reserve him for Rube with loan+option. Next season when Ronaldo leaves.Da f*ck? How much does Fiorentina want for him? 50M is a pretty good deal for them.
Probably at least 60m€. They want to extend him, Vlahovic agent wants to add a release clause. Commisso wants the release clause to be 80m€, Vlahovic agent settles with 60m€.Da f*ck? How much does Fiorentina want for him? 50M is a pretty good deal for them.
better than pjanic buyingOne of the reasons why Lukaku's sale timing is bad: we now seem to be panic buying.
60M should be do-able if we try some bonus clause and instalment. The big question I think is if Vlahovic is willing to force a transfer and which club he wants to go.Probably at least 60m€. They want to extend him, Vlahovic agent wants to add a release clause. Commisso wants the release clause to be 80m€, Vlahovic agent settles with 60m€.
Like mentioned, interest from EPL will push the prices up. They can get more than 50m€.