Romelu Lukaku

Would you buy Lukaku this summer?

  • Total voters
    93
wera

wera

might be Deadpool
La Grande Inter
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
32,868
Likes
11,761
Favorite Player
Bea Arthur
10 years of FIF
Most Diverse Poster
I'd rather get Havertz or Werner. He was good, but he was never as dominant as Ibra, so I don't see a reason why go for him now that he is again off form. No Pintus, No Conte.

With Havertz (hard to get him, but we can at least try) and Werner they would at least have some resale value.
 
Jusef

Jusef

Prima Squadra
Prima Squadra
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Messages
924
Likes
846
If Chelsea were to go bankrupt, the trustees in bankruptcy would likely find a buyer very quickly.
 
Il Drago

Il Drago

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
20,816
Likes
32,714
Favorite Player
Wesley Sneijder
Best Football Poster
Best Overall Poster

Inter Not Directly Impacted by Freeze of Chelsea Finances​

The sanctions issued by the British Government against Roman Abramovich will severely affect Chelsea, but it does not appear Inter will be caught in the crosshairs. The Nerazzurri have to collect more than half of the fee for the sale of Romelu Lukaku. However, they had taken some precautions, Calcio e Finanza indicates.

The Belgian striker transferred in a €113M move last summer. The Blues paid €22.6M right away. The Italian side cashed in €22M later on through factoring. They will receive the rest of the sum in the next 12 months.

Inter did not list Chelsea among their creditors in an official document related to their most recent bond. The Blues were present, for a total of €84.7M, until September 2021. Afterward, a factor took on the money. Therefore, the fact that the Blues’ finances have been frozen will not impact the Nerazzurri’s balance sheets.
 
Adriano@10

Adriano@10

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
May 22, 2004
Messages
9,582
Likes
2,507
Favorite Player
Oba
10 years of FIF
Il Drago said:

Inter Not Directly Impacted by Freeze of Chelsea Finances​

The sanctions issued by the British Government against Roman Abramovich will severely affect Chelsea, but it does not appear Inter will be caught in the crosshairs. The Nerazzurri have to collect more than half of the fee for the sale of Romelu Lukaku. However, they had taken some precautions, Calcio e Finanza indicates.

The Belgian striker transferred in a €113M move last summer. The Blues paid €22.6M right away. The Italian side cashed in €22M later on through factoring. They will receive the rest of the sum in the next 12 months.

Inter did not list Chelsea among their creditors in an official document related to their most recent bond. The Blues were present, for a total of €84.7M, until September 2021. Afterward, a factor took on the money. Therefore, the fact that the Blues’ finances have been frozen will not impact the Nerazzurri’s balance sheets.
Click to expand...
Interesting does anybody know if we do this often when selling players? Or did we do it as a precaution in this case cause chelsea and Abrahmovic were the counterparty? If it s the second option i ll have to applaud our fucken finance team....
Ofcourse the most logical explanation would be that we do this if the transfer summ is big enough.

On lukaku man if chelsea are forced/allowed to sell assets and the dude still wants to come here we d be idiots not to try and get him back on the cheap, and with the current situation i mean fucken cheap.
 
Il Drago

Il Drago

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
20,816
Likes
32,714
Favorite Player
Wesley Sneijder
Best Football Poster
Best Overall Poster
Adriano@10 said:
Interesting does anybody know if we do this often when selling players? Or did we do it as a precaution in this case cause chelsea and Abrahmovic were the counterparty? If it s the second option i ll have to applaud our fucken finance team....
Ofcourse the most logical explanation would be that we do this if the transfer summ is big enough.

On lukaku man if chelsea are forced/allowed to sell assets and the dude still wants to come here we d be idiots not to try and get him back on the cheap, and with the current situation i mean fucken cheap.
Click to expand...
Apparently we did the same with Hakimi money.
 
ElDuccio

ElDuccio

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
11,859
Likes
3,142
Favorite Player
Il Fenomeno
10 years of FIF
Lukaku would EAT Scammacca in a 1vs1 football duell. If we compare this 2 players, Lukaku is on a diffrent level. Anyone thnking we don't need Lukaku, enjoy your Scammacca. You will be dissapointed.
 
brehme1989

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,565
Likes
17,308
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
Adriano@10 said:
Interesting does anybody know if we do this often when selling players? Or did we do it as a precaution in this case cause chelsea and Abrahmovic were the counterparty? If it s the second option i ll have to applaud our fucken finance team....
Ofcourse the most logical explanation would be that we do this if the transfer summ is big enough.
Click to expand...

common practice
 
bubba zanetti

bubba zanetti

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Sep 8, 2020
Messages
9,153
Likes
9,898
Favorite Player
Chino Recoba
ElDuccio said:
Lukaku would EAT Scammacca in a 1vs1 football duell. If we compare this 2 players, Lukaku is on a diffrent level. Anyone thnking we don't need Lukaku, enjoy your Scammacca. You will be dissapointed.
Click to expand...
I dont know how good Scamacca is but I know that Lukaku stinks, he proved it once again in PL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVD
brakbrak

brakbrak

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
6,668
Likes
6,834
Favorite Player
Christian Vieri
10 years of FIF
bubba zanetti said:
I dont know how good Scamacca is but I know that Lukaku stinks, he proved it once again in PL.
Click to expand...
Lol he will still dominate in this Serie A league while shtting the bed in CL as per usual
 
CafeCordoba

CafeCordoba

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
35,424
Likes
14,756
Favorite Player
Toro, Barella
10 years of FIF
Adriano@10 said:
Interesting does anybody know if we do this often when selling players? Or did we do it as a precaution in this case cause chelsea and Abrahmovic were the counterparty? If it s the second option i ll have to applaud our fucken finance team....
Ofcourse the most logical explanation would be that we do this if the transfer summ is big enough.

On lukaku man if chelsea are forced/allowed to sell assets and the dude still wants to come here we d be idiots not to try and get him back on the cheap, and with the current situation i mean fucken cheap.
Click to expand...
I don't think about Abra risk factor.

It was probably because we wanted money right away but the deal with Chelsea had installments. So we pay small fee to bank etc who takes our credit position or how you call it and pay the money to us right away.

Interesting part is why did we need the money right away.
 
ADRossi

ADRossi

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
19,065
Likes
20,240
10 years of FIF
Forum Supporter
Has anyone ever dated a girl, broken up with her, gotten back together with her, and then realized that the relationship you idealized during the initial breakup is long gone?

That will be resigning Lukaku.
 
Strale

Strale

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
1,305
Likes
954
Favorite Player
Eyjafjallajökul
Forum Supporter
If we get Lukaku for free we can safely assume Marotta arranged the war. I don't see any way around that conclusion.
 
RickyMaravilla'sRightFoot

RickyMaravilla'sRightFoot

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
5,696
Likes
8,073
Favorite Player
CARLOS
I’d be strongly against making a significant financial investment in him. If he’s available on the cheap/ free— sure. It would be essentially like loaning him for a year for a massive fee. Of course Lukaku would have to accept the lower wage and be willing to start from zero. The fans will not so easily forgive him— none of this king of Milano bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVD
Q

qb4ever_2k

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
6,222
Likes
3,241
10 years of FIF
ElDuccio said:
Lukaku would EAT Scammacca in a 1vs1 football duell. If we compare this 2 players, Lukaku is on a diffrent level. Anyone thnking we don't need Lukaku, enjoy your Scammacca. You will be dissapointed.
Click to expand...
In the best case, Lukaku is levels above Scamacca.

But in the worst case, I can’t see how Scamacca can go anywhere as low as Lukaku is right now. And Scamacca is also 6 years younger and on much cheaper wage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top