David Marcelo Cortez Pizarro

[Marcello]

he was one of thoese players i liked at inter at he always took these nice drive shots that where great similar to veron always creating and shooting

Vieria and Cambiasso are EPL style cm players great passes and great brain but for some reason lack the creativiy role that players like pizzaro , riqulme, deco hopefully yous get me

 

[Suneet]

he was one of thoese players i liked at inter at he always took these nice drive shots that where great similar to veron always creating and shooting

Vieria and Cambiasso are EPL style cm players great passes and great brain but for some reason lack the creativiy role that players like pizzaro , riqulme, deco hopefully yous get me

I dont think he can be put:nono: in that list. Riquelme, Deco have a lot more class.

 

[Marcello]

I dont think he can be put:nono: in that list. Riquelme, Deco have a lot more class.

Yep no doubt about that but using them as examples even corini

 

[Alex de Large]

Pizarro is a great creative player for middle-table teams like Udinese or Livorno. Not Roma or Inter, Perrotta, Aquilani or De Rossi are all much better than him.

 

[Link]

no no not in "1" but the central of the "3"

i don't think he fits in the central of the "3", he has shitty defending skills which is the reason why we have somebody like cuchu there now to protect the defense line isn't it?

 

[cloudq]

i have a feeling pizarro will end up at newcastle

 

[Il Muro]

thats what i hate... "wasn't bad". that's not enough for a club like Inter. We need and deserve better.

I agree. We need Pizzaro.

 

[rfU]

I agree. We need Pizzaro.

Il Muro, you're like a little pebble in my shoe, annoying as hell . Difference is, Pizarro wasn't shit at Inter, and now he's a MUCH better player with Roma. If you had watched him play you'd know this :rollani: I'm not saying he's the best playmaker out there, but he's a feasible alternative and is worth discussing. You want to keep relying on Patrick Vieira and Stankovic for creativity

As for RQ7, all these months and still nothing?? At least Suazo and Obinha managed to contribute. There has been zero improvement since he arrived but still everyone's ready to wait him out, asking Mourinho to give him more chances. It was Mourinho who requested him in the first place so the fact that Ricky doesn't play should tell us something. At this point I'd rather give some of our youth a try.

 

[Il Muro]

Il Muro, you're like a little pebble in my shoe, annoying as hell . Difference is, Pizarro wasn't shit at Inter, and now he's a MUCH better player with Roma. If you had watched him play you'd know this :rollani: I'm not saying he's the best playmaker out there, but he's a feasible alternative and is worth discussing. You want to keep relying on Patrick Vieira and Stankovic for creativity

As for RQ7, all these months and still nothing?? At least Suazo and Obinha managed to contribute. There has been zero improvement since he arrived but still everyone's ready to wait him out, asking Mourinho to give him more chances. It was Mourinho who requested him in the first place so the fact that Ricky doesn't play should tell us something. At this point I'd rather give some of our youth a try.

The thing is, you'd probably describe Pizarro's time at Inter as "not bad". He certainly wasn't great and we ended up giving him away to Roma quite easily. However you still keep calling for Inter to re sign him, yet according to you, players like this are not good enough for Inter.

I don't want Vieira and Stankovic as playmakers, since they aren't playmakers anyway. However if we were to sign one, i would get someone better and younger than Pizarro.

As for RQ7, i don't know what you expected when he was only given 15 minutes.

 

[rfU]

However you still keep calling for Inter to re sign him, yet according to you, players like this are not good enough for Inter.

did i say he wasn't good enough to Inter? I only said he's not the best out there.If Moratti has 50+ mil to spend on Fabregas or Xavi, then forget Pizarro. I don't like this re-signing business, not with Pandev, not with Pizarro, Pirlo, Seedorf or any other ex-inter players, but then I can't stand to watch us struggling like we did against Cagliari and the 2nd half vs Barca.

I don't want Vieira and Stankovic as playmakers, since they aren't playmakers anyway. However if we were to sign one, i would get someone better and younger than Pizarro.

Okay, who?

As for RQ7, i don't know what you expected when he was only given 15 minutes.

wasn't expecting him to anything. In fact I don't expect RQ7 to do a thing all season long, if he's even around that long. I mean, we cheer for him when he makes a successful pass This is craziness.

 

[Il Muro]

did i say he wasn't good enough to Inter?

"wasn't bad". that's not enough for a club like Inter.

So yeah. It's implied at least.

I only said he's not the best out there.If Moratti has 50+ mil to spend on Fabregas or Xavi, then forget Pizarro. I don't like this re-signing business, not with Pandev, not with Pizarro, Pirlo, Seedorf or any other ex-inter players, but then I can't stand to watch us struggling like we did against Cagliari and the 2nd half vs Barca.

Better to solve the problem properly and for the long term, rather than getting some half assed solution that is only good for the short term.

Okay, who?

Lucho

wasn't expecting him to anything. In fact I don't expect RQ7 to do a thing all season long, if he's even around that long. I mean, we cheer for him when he makes a successful pass This is craziness.

There's only so much he can do in 15 mins. If Mourinho doesn't give him a proper chance then he's not going to do much, but that's not RQ7's fault.

 

[rfU]

So yeah. It's implied at least.

What... where... who... What Il Muro, I think you're purposely trying to drive me insane. How the hell is it implied??? I don't think what you wrote even makes sense to you What I said is, Pizarro isn't a world class playmaker (and that's my opinion, I'm sure Roma fans say otherwise) but that doesn't mean he isn't good enough for Inter. We need his passing skills to unlock rugged defences like Cagliari and Samp today. So whether its coming off the bench or in the starting 11, he's definitely good enough.

Better to solve the problem properly and for the long term, rather than getting some half assed solution that is only good for the short term.

You're right. I'd rather a younger player too. But I think Pizarro would come reasonably price and be able to give us 2 good seasons.

Lucho

I haven't watched Lucho much but I don't remember ever thinking of him as a 'natural' playmaker. Certainly his long passing isn't at the level of D'Ago or Pizarro. Is it? Anyway, problem with Lucho is a) he doesn't have serie A experience or big team experience. Pizarro has at least one of those. b) Marseille just bought him for like 20m Euros, so if want him, we will have to pay a lot more (that of course depends on how well he performs. If he flops, well, why are we even bothering ). Roma on the other hand, are broke (they haven't paid their players since april), so if we wanted, we could get Pizarro at a reasonable price.

There's only so much he can do in 15 mins. If Mourinho doesn't give him a proper chance then he's not going to do much, but that's not RQ7's fault.

But that's the thing, it is his fault. Mourinho requested him, made Moratti pay all those millions for him, so its not like Mourinho is purposely trying to ruin RQ7's career by not playing him If RQ7 impresses in training, he'll play more.

 

[crzdcolombian]

Hulk ??? I mentioned Falcao last year the GUY WAS FING FREE !!! and has scored a goal a game since his time in portugal.... and half of you were like he is colombian he sucks

 

[Il Muro]

What... where... who... What Il Muro, I think you're purposely trying to drive me insane. How the hell is it implied??? I don't think what you wrote even makes sense to you What I said is, Pizarro isn't a world class playmaker (and that's my opinion, I'm sure Roma fans say otherwise) but that doesn't mean he isn't good enough for Inter. We need his passing skills to unlock rugged defences like Cagliari and Samp today. So whether its coming off the bench or in the starting 11, he's definitely good enough.

Please stop trying to take such a patronising approach.

You said "wasn't bad" isn't good enough for Inter. When Pizarro was at Inter he "wasn't bad", so therefore according to you, he is not good enough for Inter.

You're right. I'd rather a younger player too. But I think Pizarro would come reasonably price and be able to give us 2 good seasons.

What makes you think Pizarro would even consider rejoining us? And i doubt Roma would let him go so easily. They already let go of Aquilani and are now more reliant on Pizarro.

I haven't watched Lucho much but I don't remember ever thinking of him as a 'natural' playmaker. Certainly his long passing isn't at the level of D'Ago or Pizarro. Is it? Anyway, problem with Lucho is a) he doesn't have serie A experience or big team experience. Pizarro has at least one of those. b) Marseille just bought him for like 20m Euros, so if want him, we will have to pay a lot more (that of course depends on how well he performs. If he flops, well, why are we even bothering ). Roma on the other hand, are broke (they haven't paid their players since april), so if we wanted, we could get Pizarro at a reasonable price.

Well there you go, you havn't seen him much. His long range passing is as good as D'Ago or Pizarro.

Fair enough, Lucho won't join us. Neither will Pizarro though.

But that's the thing, it is his fault. Mourinho requested him, made Moratti pay all those millions for him, so its not like Mourinho is purposely trying to ruin RQ7's career by not playing him If RQ7 impresses in training, he'll play more.

No he is not trying to purposely ruin his career but he did say RQ7 deserves another chance. So far this season, he hasn't been given a proper chance. It's not as simple as impressing in training and he'll play. Mourinho doesn't like to rotate and has played most of the season with no wingers, so no room for RQ.

 

[rfU]

Please stop trying to take such a patronising approach.

too late. even if i did say such a thing you'd have to look at it contextually. Even Julio Cesar has "wasn't bad" moments, so to Stankovic, Cambiasso, I could go on. But it's their overall performance that we should look at. Pizarro has shown his quality at a consistent level with Roma for several season.

What makes you think Pizarro would even consider rejoining us? And i doubt Roma would let him go so easily. They already let go of Aquilani and are now more reliant on Pizarro.

as i had already explained Roma players haven't paid this season. A man's gotta eat, right However you look at it, there's more of a chance of Pizarro joining and being succesful than Lucho at Inter.

Christ, just admit I'm right and lets move on. This is a RQ7 thread after all :rollani:

 

[Il Muro]

too late. even if i did say such a thing you'd have to look at it contextually. Even Julio Cesar has "wasn't bad" moments, so to Stankovic, Cambiasso, I could go on. But it's their overall performance that we should look at. Pizarro has shown his quality at a consistent level with Roma for several season.

Not too late, i said exactly the same thing originally aswell.

Of course they have their own "wasn't bad" moments but overall their performances are better than that. None of that is really relevant though.

Pizarro hasn't been consistent at Roma. But my point is, when he was in an Inter shirt he "wasn't bad", which according to you, is not good enough for Inter. So again, why are you calling for us to sign him?

as i had already explained Roma players haven't paid this season. A man's gotta eat, right However you look at it, there's more of a chance of Pizarro joining and being succesful than Lucho at Inter.

Christ, just admit I'm right and lets move on. This is a RQ7 thread after all :rollani:

What makes you think he will join us though?

Pizarro already played for us before and wasn't succesful so i don't know how you came to the conclusion that he is more likely to suceed at Inter than Lucho.

I would admit you're right if you actually were right. However you're not, yet you're trying you're best to wriggle your way out. I notice you are very selective in your responses. There are parts of my post that you do not respond to at all. Why is this?