Again not true, or you didn't get my point. Leo almost always uses 4-3-1-2 from the start TRUE, but the game and the result changes to better when we switch to 4-2-3-1.
There was just one game when Leo used three attackers from start, and that even wasn't 4-2-3-1 but 4-3-3 from the start, i can't remmember was it against Sampdoria, the game when he played Eto'o, Pazzo and Milito bouth just before Sneijder came after injury, but that didn't work for numbers of reason, First and the most it wasn't 4-2-3-1 and Sneijder wasn't here, Milito sucks on wing, Pazo and Eto were too isolated, and our three midlfielders were disaster.
Also Leo wants to play 4-3-1-2 with Cuchu and Mota switched possition, witch still its a mistery to me, since its obvius for watever reason is Mota playing like DM and Cuhcu as LCM it doesn't fuking work. Cuchu playing against Bayern in his old place was back to himself again altow he did make some mistakes his overal play was fantastic in my opinion. Also the third man either is Deki/Khajra doesn't contirbute nothing in attack. I know playing 4-3-1-2 is on paper safier formation but with our midfielders is like playing with a man less, and we are far more effective when we switch to 4-2-3-1.
So every one should say why wait till 60' and the result isn't in our advantage when we can play 4-2-3-1 from the start and then if the result is good switch to 4-3-1-2 and rest our players, i give you one reason Brecia?! Sure if Pandev have scored we wouldn't have drawn again, it doesn't matter, the point is we got the result wail playing 4-2-3-1.
10 years of FIF
