- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Messages
- 9,549
- Likes
- 494
- Old username
- Khaled
Forum Supporter
10 years of FIF
I thought this was quite an interesting post and the truth be told, it can not be ignored. I am not sure how you can say that under Mancini, Cambiasso had no role. I thought his role was quite clear cut in that he was our first choice defensive midfielder, the player that marks our opponent's star player's out of matches and breaks up their play. As you would be well aware, Cambiasso's positioning and ability to read the play is strong as he quite often gets into positions where he scores goals.
I am not sure if you have mistaken Atalanta or Club Brugge for Inter but I think it is laughable to suggest that Cambiasso can not handle big pressure matches. The fact of the matter is that on occasions when Cambiasso has been missing from our midfield, the team has struggled.
With regards to him not being able to control the midfield, it has never been his job to do so. It was not his job at Real Madrid, it has not been his job for the Argentine National Team and it is not his job at Inter. Cambiasso is not a creative player and his strengths lie in his ability to defend, tackle, man-mark and contribute unexpected goals when the team is moving foward.
I agree that Lampard is the type of player that control a midfield and dictate the tempo of play. The truth be told, I have serious concerns about Mourinho's 4-3-3 formation because we simply do not have the personnel to make it happen. Vieria, Dacourt, Cambiasso, Captain Zanetti, Mancini, Pele, Jimenez, Figo, Muntari and Stankovic in his form present are not capable of achieving this and I sincerely think we are going to struggle as the squad is essentially built to play 4-4-2 or a derivative of that formation.
I think Cambiasso's strengths and weaknesses are well known to every poster on this forum. I believe his role under Mancini was clearly defined but that under Mourinho and a 4-3-3 formation, Cambiasso, and our midfield as a whole is going to struggle because we do not have the personnel to play that formation.
Lastly, I would just like to add that all the whining that has been going on about Lampard is quick sickening. We have been the Champions of Italy for the last three season's and we have been begging and grovelling Lampard to move from Chelsea to Inter. In light of the above post, I believe he or a similar player is needed but it disgusts me to see the Nerazzurri faithful pining over a Chelsea player who has opted for the comfort of what he knows (English football) and higher earnings over a new challenge in a league that has a different footballing philosophy. I am sure that Mourinho will overcome this problem but have some pride and forget about Frank Lampard.
Why do people always result to personal remarks when someone is making a point or remark on a player? I did not mistake anything,i watch the same inter matches everyone does, you have your opinions and i have mine, what the hell is wrong with you? Nobody here is close to an orgasm over lampard,what was mainly pointed out is that someone like lampard is needed and that our midfield isnt good enough for certain matches,if this really disgusts you and you are telling other people that because of their opinions they should have some pride then i dont really know what to tell you man, your post speaks for itself.
Again people are taking everything that is said point by point, Cambiasso is our MAIN DM,ok but is that really what he does in our games?Cambiasso is a 2 way midfielder and he doesnt excel in either one of those departments, what i see in the long run is a player that is totally lost and irrelevant to our midfield and when any pressure is presented he nor our midfield cant handle that.
In that cambiasso post i qouted from you, you say his role is to defend, man mark etc.. and contribute UNEXPECTED GOALS when the team is moving forward...lol Unexpected goals come from any player on the pitch, that is not a role of one player, that is the role of ANY player going forward when the team is moving forward, dont you see burdisso,samuel and cordoba scoring goals? If they werent defending well would you use theur UNEXPECTED goals as an excuse? and if cambiasso's role doesnt include taking over the midfield then who's role is it? Javier our main DM now? Or Vieira who seems to have lost the ability of controlling a midfield? Stankovic who seems to have lost all sense with a football? or Cambiasso who was actually placed as our main central midfielder and a player who you see always going forward but not doing nothing (Except get a couple of goals which offcourse will be used to praise the guy) and a person who he HIMSELF said that his favorite role is a PLAYMAKER which i think is the definition of what you said that was never his job?