- Joined
- Jul 24, 2006
- Messages
- 16,648
- Likes
- 36
- Favorite Player
- Black & Blue
10 years of FIF
Actually it's the other way around .h. Remember how Maicon was great, because Javier was there filling his shoes when he was roaming forward.with 2 good ball playing CBs, I dont really think we need a third. Remember, it isnt about symmetry, its about balance. With Hakimi as a very attacking wing back, a more traditional CB might be a really good foil for him.
This is the same thing here. Because Hakimi will be bombing forward probably 99% of the time, we need a defender who can cover that wing. That means covering for some dangerous wingers from opposing teams. That means you need speed, you need agility, you need good composure on those 1 on 1. Skriniar does not have any of those. Even when he was monster for us in first season, you could see whenever there is some counter where it's 2 on 2 or something like that and Skriniar is facing some pacey player, it sounded trouble.
We need a defender who is maybe worse (overall) to Skriniar, but is better than him as a RCB.