They can rest during the international break,I don't want any of that shit here.Barella need rest, put Brozovic first and then in 2nd half substitite with Barella (for last 15minutes if necessary). Loltaro same, put Correa instead. For god sake Inzaghi
Conte-ball was just as unsustainable, ugly to watch, and relied too heavily on a player that is no longer here.Problem is not only defense exposure. Ultra-attacking football will drain our players' gas really quick and you always need a deep squad to maintain such form. For a whole long season. Which we don't have, and we will suffer later on.
Many fifers hated Conte-ball, but that effective football has been proven to be the best way to win the league. We don't need a 5-0 win then gas out for the next four matches. We need five 1-0 win. There is a correlation.
Just logged in to say the exact same thing, thank you for this point.That just isn't true. We came from behind to beat Fiorentina, Torino, and Cagliari under Conte. In the second half of the season we hardly ever conceded, so there was no need to come from behind.
Last year's squad was really impressive in Serie A. I don't get why people insist on underplaying their achievements.
Last year's squad was really impressive in Serie A. I don't get why people insist on underplaying their achievements.
They were absolutely horrible for the first four months of last season, no doubt. But they made the required tactical changes and were dominant for a 15 match stretch. Conte and company deserve credit for that. We reached our ceiling under him. Unfortunately, we replaced him with a coach whose ceiling is probably a step lower.
Your first sentence is simply wrong. "Unsustainable" but we won the league with 91 points? Inzaghi-ball is more of that. We can score twice and still isn't sure of 3 points in our pocket. That is unsustainable.Conte-ball was just as unsustainable, ugly to watch, and relied too heavily on a player that is no longer here.
Under Conte when the team conceded first or needed to get a result, real scoring opportunities were few.
Under Insaghi, this inter has been able to come back from a losing position to win twice and almost a third time - Verona, Fiorentina, Atalanta , simply from all the chances created.
Similaire to Conte, this team still has a hard time converting the chances it creates.
So we’re not going to consider Conte’s first season, Coppa Italia performances, CL/EL performances?That just isn't true. We came from behind to beat Fiorentina, Torino, and Cagliari under Conte. In the second half of the season we hardly ever conceded, so there was no need to come from behind.
Last year's squad was really impressive in Serie A. I don't get why people insist on underplaying their achievements.
It was not a bad luck.Sure, we‘ve lost the plot in CL thanks to very bad luck...
By your logic, excluding EVERY matches but big teams in Europe, sorry, it's safe to say that Inzaghi would not win shit either. He just lost a weak Real Madrid at our home.So we’re not going to consider Conte’s first season, Coppa Italia performances, CL/EL performances?
I challenge anyone to tell me one time, just one match, where Conte’s Inter won a match that on paper they WERE NOT the favorites for winning. Think back to the CL matches-Barca,Dortmund, Real Madrid, even Sevilla EL final.
Don’t anyone say the Inter-Juve match last season to be one of them.
Conte almost never delivered when it mattered and his Inter grinded their way to the title last season by being the most consistently “above average” team.
It makes you wonder why the hell we spent 30m on Correa when Inzaghi is dead set on Dzeko-Lautaro. Instead we should have got a no. 9 to rest Dzeko.Dzeko set to start again