Torino - Inter (14 Mar 21) [1-2]

[Candreva Crosses]

The scary part of that picture is how we are trending down game after game.

 

[FairyTailed]

The scary part of that picture is how we are trending down game after game.

While it's hard to maintain a 7,76 average (a dominant performance against an average or weak side won't even get you that), you're right that the trend is going downwards and our football has looked bleaker too. But as long as we get the tre punti I'm fine

 

[.h.]

theres numbers, I assume, are defined by FIF submission scores?

Of course Milan is gonna be a high point. Just like Juve was a high point. We're winning big games in decent style.

I think there's nothing unexpected about this at all really.

 

[Devious]

This decline will continue as long as we are forced to play Gags and Vecino, it's that simple. We need Sensi back now and Ericksen not injured cause we need players to lead this team's midfield and create solutions, we got lucky vs Torino when the coach decided to have some balls for a change and fielded Sanchez as a trequartista which offered a brilliant pinpoint assist. But that same sub vs stronger teams would create problems for us than the opposition.

 

[YoramG]

I'm quite interested in the fact that people rated the Milan game as higher than the Juve game.

Yeah, the score-line is much more favourable, but Milan were in the game much more than Juve ever were. That was complete domination other than one Chiesa shot, we could have won that one 4/5-0 if we had more clinical forwards.

 

[.h.]

I think that goes exactly to my point. We probably scored it so highly because it helped us consolidate or go first (cant remember exactly). It's more coupled to emotional response than performance.

 

[FairyTailed]

theres numbers, I assume, are defined by FIF submission scores?

There's multiple places participating, but I think FIF members are a good 25-45% of the total votes (depending from game to game). It's hard to give exact numbers. I use a link that tracks clicks (i.e. from where the link is clicked on), but it shows just that, clicks. Not actual submissions.

This is also posted in a facebook group which is really big. Depending on the type of game and how we play, the votes from there can be between 40-200 in absolute numbers (which is a huge difference relatively speaking).

All sources for info used are mentioned in the post!

Edit: as an example

Game vs MILAN - 224 votes ; 59,26% of clicks -> votes

Game vs TORINO - 63 votes ; 69,23% of clicks -> votes

The amount of clicks from FIF is quite consistent in relative terms. While the facebook ones really fluctuate. I don't mind sharing these for more games if anyone is interested. In the Overall Season Doc you can already compared the #votes per game under the "Game Data" tab: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1u6kI-Pjc7Am-LwpUUxa9-t-5a9tbeGQeveWdZJWzbyE/edit?usp=sharing

 

[Il Drago]

This is also posted in a facebook group which is really big. Depending on the type of game and how we play, the votes from there can be between 40-200 in absolute numbers (which is a huge difference relatively speaking).

All sources for info used are mentioned in the post!

I hope you have promoted FIF to the facebook group.

Perhaps there could be interest from its members to join the forum.

 

[FairyTailed]

I hope you have promoted FIF to the facebook group.

Perhaps there could be interest from its members to join the forum.

FIF is more promoted than the FB group! They don't even have a logo (yet)! :slick:

 

[Candreva Crosses]

I hope you have promoted FIF to the facebook group.

Perhaps there could be interest from its members to join the forum.

First demands as moderator, not bad