That's a good point. On paper, it really seems like he doesn't fit into this Inter squad, especially with our current formation. However, if a player like Thuram can pair well with Lautaro, I don't see why Carboni couldn't fill that role in some games.
Carboni looks like a great fit for the "vice-Thuram" position, also can cover some more attacking roles in the midfield. With Mehdi being more of a clinical finisher (vice-Lauti), and Arnautvic and Correa are just waste of space at this point.
Which brings me again to what I'm trying to say; that Carboni fits the profile of players like Thuram, Arnautović, and Correa, rather than being a completely different type of player, or a player that is completely unusable.
None of these players are your conventional strikers; they operate as second strikers and don't primarily rely on scoring a lot of goals. I'm not getting at whether they are good or bad, but we got them instead of pure strikers for a reason. Putting Thuram in the same category as them is a crime lol, definitely not talking about the quality, but rather the profile of the player
I almost forgot about Sanchez, who we used as a forward last season, which is why I really think Carboni has a future here, in this formation, under Inzaghi.
I see Carboni thriving in this kind of role in the field, and just in general, not too much pressure on his shoulders - which is why I believe that fewer minutes at a higher level would benefit him more than more minutes at a lower level, in this particular case for this particular player. It definitely isn't like this alway, so I'm not generalizing.
Additionally, we're targeting Gudmundsson, a player profile unknown to me, but from the youtube and reading about it, wont be utilized as he was in Bologna, and definitely wont bring some sort of quality in the team that we are missing.
edit: genoa, not bologna