My biggest compliment for Cuper's work with us is that took an average team and turned it into a consistent and well-respected contender in both Italy and Europe. Unlike Mancini, he didn't need a big transfers budget or super players in all positions in order to put some respected performances on the pitch.
Sure Cuper's Inter was a trophy-less Inter, but is it the same trophy-less Inter with Mancini currently? Fuck no, not even close. With Cuper, we weren't the joke that we are now with Mancini. It's also pathetic that Cuper never got the support and faith that Inter's management is blindly giving Mancini.
I love Cuper, and have a lot of respect for him. But dude, have you got that bit completely the other way round. Its probably not your fault, this is the problem at FIF - when many people repeat a lie many times, everyone seems to start believing it to be true. I have pointed out these facts before, let me do this one more time (not that it will make any difference, some people will believe whatever convenient lie that suits their agenda - not referring to you here, mate).
We spent BIG money during Cuper's time, on top of an already expensive team which included the likes of Ronaldo, Seedorf, Vieri, Zambrano, Cordoba, Zanetti, Emre, Blanc, Recoba, Di Biagio, etc. Here are the numbers and the players we spent it on.
2001-02:
Spent: €103 million (This figure does not include the €18m we gave milan for 2 useless youth players)
Players bought: Toldo (27m), Conceicao (18m), Adriano (7m), Kallon (13m), C Zanetti (11m), Sorondo, Vivas, Materazzi (11m).
2002-03:
Spent: €110 million
Players bought: Crespo (36m), Coco (23m), Almeyda (22m), Cannavaro (23m).
Those were crazy numbers at that time, one of the highest in Europe.
In Mancini time, we actually spent far less and much more cleverly. Here are the numbers:
2003-04:
Spent: €19 million
Players bought: Adriano (15m), Stankovic (4m)
2004-05:
Spent: €4 million
Players bought: Burdisso (4m), Cambiasso (free), Davids (free), Mihajlovic (free), Veron (loan).
We actually made money in the season, selling players worth 30m!
2005-06:
Spent: €32 million
Players bought: Samuel (18m), Pizarro (12m), Julio Cesar (free), Figo (free).
Our net spend was again marginal, just 10m.
2006-07:
Spent: €48 million
Players bought: Ibrahimovic (25m), Vieira (10m), Maicon (7m), Grosso (6m), Crespo (loan)
After sales of Pizarro & Martins, our net spend was only 17m.
2007-08
Spent: €40 million
Players bought: Chivu (15m), Suazo (13m),
Net spend was only 25m.
So in 4.5 seasons, Mancini's net spend on transfers was just about 44 million on transfers. That is just 10 million per season, and the lowest for any coach at Inter in the Moratti era (who has been at Inter for more than a season). Even the total money he spent on transfers in 4.5 years was just €145m, which is just 32m per season. It is much less than what we have spent for the likes of Mazzarri, Strama, etc. And for that money, he added players like Ibrahimovic, Figo, Cambiasso, Samuel, Vieira, Maicon, Julio Cesar, Stankovic, Chivu, etc. It was the first time in Moratti era that Inter actually got smart in the transfer market.
I am not sure you remember the time post the 2002 fiasco. I remember it like it were yesterday. Moratti had got disillusioned with football and Inter after spending like crazy for so many years. By the time he hired Mancini, he had stopped spending big. Shortly after, he resigned his presidency and made Facchetti Inter's President with greatly reduced budgets. It was then when things started changing for Inter. Mancini started looking for free transfers and loan deals to get in the required quality. And in his typical way with less interference from Moratti, he started to build a proper squad with strong players and back ups in every part of the pitch - unlike the unbalanced expensive squads of before. People give too much credit to Ibrahimovic sometimes, he was great, but it was the clever deals before Calciopoli that made Inter champions - Cambiasso, Figo, Cesar, Samuel, Mancon, Stankovic... that was the base, Ibra was the icing.
So saying that Cuper didn't need a big budget unlike Mancini couldn't be further than the truth. Cuper spent big - he spent more in 2 seasons than Mancini spent in almost 5 seasons! Mancini spent very little and also won stuff. That said, Cuper did well for Inter and I personally think his work helped Mancini to build upon, just like Mancini helped Mourinho.