That's a bit of disrespect of Lautaro given his goal tally in Serie A. People are making way too far reaching conclusions over one matchup loss to Atletico.Exactly we need an addition to Lautaro, not replace him. That player was supposed to be Lukaku but he couldn't repeat his Conte form and eventually gone mental. We still haven't really replaced Lukaku properly which clearly what was missing against Atletico. Thuram is just NOT that player and was brought here for different purposes.
We got away with it in Serie A because we're simply light years a head of everyone. We could put Acerbi in attack and still gonna spank everyone. However, it's a different story in the CL. That missing piece in attack has showed up.
Immoblie scored more goals in ucl this season than any of our strikers and got out of the group stage...Or we wouldn't even get out of the group stages
As expected
not until 2026.Is he free?
Lautaro, Thuram, Immobile and Taremi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchez and Arnautovic
That's the problem. He is owned by Lazio until retirement.Is he free?
Lautaro, Thuram, Immobile and Taremi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchez and Arnautovic
It's not the question who is better, but the parameters of the deal. He has a long contract and Lotito won't sell cheap. And Ciro is 34 years old, visibly declined in last two seasons.Really - Arnautovic and Sanchez is better than Immobile?
If all three was available Ciro would be my choice of the three. However, since he has a contract until 2026 its not even discussion and by then he shouldnt even be considered 5th striker.