- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Messages
- 29,310
- Likes
- 7,401
- Favorite Player
- Inter1-0Wanda
- Old username
- browha
Forum Supporter
10 years of FIF
Well, two things i thinkWhat do you mean? That players would come in with cheaper valuation compared to normal transactions?
I feel like swaps are extremely rare. We need to want certain player from Chelsea and we need that player to come to Inter.
Chelsea has intention to create plusvalenza themselves. A lot of it, so valuations won't be low I assume.
1 - If Chelsea have to sell Mendy, we sell Onana, and then we sign (say) Vicario, that's 3 negotiations. It takes a lot of time, that's not fast like it is in FM. A swap would save both us, and Chelsea time - and I think both of these clubs will be time restrained this transfer window given the volume of players who are leaving/joining
2 - Swaps will help both clubs with some much needed plusvalenza. If we say Onana is fair value 60mil, Mendy is 20mil, then Onana = Mendy + 40mil and we say Onana was sold for 70m, Mendy for 30m, everyone walks away happy. Of course, its important not to do what Juve did and (a) go too far on valuation, (b) write down that you're deliberately inflating valuations for capital gains
I'm not saying necessarily Mendy is the right answer, but if we think we'd be happy with him, then its not a terrible idea imho