I'm not disagreeing there, but when you are forced to lose 3 vital players in the 10 first minutes of the 2nd half, then things can't go according to plan.
Some players are inexcusably called up to the national team (Patsatzoglou, Kapetanos, Charisteas....) and have been used. We lacked options we should have had, just because of Otto's favoring.
But there is no creative player available for the game, barring a 20year old Ninis, and there are 10 tough players that are good defensively. So it's logical that vs a highly technical Argentina you use at least 7 tough defensive players.
The qualification of Greece was lost in the game with Korea, and that;s not an opinion. Greece could have defeated Korea if the best available lineup was used. I made a post after that game commenting on that, no interest in repeating myself. You can't use your 4th and 5th best center backs vs Korea and what&ever in offense and expect results. Everyone realised that when Papastathopoulos stopped Messi tonight on plenty of occasions. And apparently the 5th choice center back was ever-present on the Greek lineup :rollani:
We now have a new coach, Fernando Santos, who I hope will be less biased on his choices and will give a chance for those that want to play for the national team, and those that can.
Our qualification path is relatively easy, only Croatia is the tough opponent, so you might see Greece pulling a 180, which I doubt as Santos is a very defensive minded coach. Rehhaghel at Euro 2004 had very technical players in Karagounis, Tsiartas, Basinas, Katsouranis, Seitaridis and decided to play defensively and he won. Santos apparently only played using defensive stategies while in Greece, so I doubt he won't continue the German's footsteps... We should have gone for a Greek coach who understands what the people wanna see and not fight with percentiles for a good result. Cause what are the odds that Argentina won't score with 70% possession??