Roberto Mancini

[Inter2010]

Lol... I just found out that Mancini is the highest paid in Serie A! Lol!

did you just discover... google

 

[The_Eradicator]

did you just discover... google

http://www.football-italia.net/72624/mancini-highest-paid-coach

Probably referring to this which was just published.

4mil for Mancini and Mazzarri still on the books for 3.5mil, bloody hell.

 

[Ronin]

Mazzarri is on the book only till the end of this season, right?

 

[Sassuolu]

Not sure till when his contract is we resigned him months before the sacking.

And why is it surprising that Mancini is the highest paid manager? He's the most successful manager in the league whether you like him of hate him.

 

[JJM]

and then there is this

this one is better though :fuckyea:

 

[Mortimer]

Not sure till when his contract is we resigned him months before the sacking.

And why is it surprising that Mancini is the highest paid manager? He's the most successful manager in the league whether you like him of hate him.

His contract is until 30 June, 2017 according to transfermarkt.

 

[Wallace]

His contract is until 30 June, 2017 according to transfermarkt.

Better renew him now for another ten years.

 

[bandiera]

Better renew him now for another ten years.

Too long, eight years is more than enough time for us to keep blindly spending and stumble upon a decent formula so we can resign Mourinho and win another treble. Forza Mancini.

 

[Lui]

Stop hoping that we are ever going to be a club that is financially responsible and conscious with regards to future planning.

 

[RMancini10]

http://mcfchistory.co.uk/2015/09/08/roberto-mancini-2009-2013/

Great article on Mancio

 

[Black Knight]

For an article written by an English guy on a website about the history of an English club, the grammatical mistakes are as atrocious as they are numerous.

 

[wera]

Dose are some bat mistakes.

 

[Devious]

That are to sade

 

[RMancini10]

For an article written by an English guy on a website about the history of an English club, the grammatical mistakes are as atrocious as they are numerous.

Haha just read over it again and the mistakes are palpable. Shame because the point it is trying to make is a good one.

 

[Vintage]

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Sassuolu]

http://mcfchistory.co.uk/2015/09/08/roberto-mancini-2009-2013/

Great article on Mancio

HE DIDNT WRITE MANCINI SPENT MONEY LIKE ALL THE TEAMS IN THE PREMIERSHIP TO WIN! HOW DATE HE SPEND MONEY!?!?! HE WAS LUCKY!?!?! YOU KNOW?

 

[uzhang]

Dear Mancio
[URL=http://s864.photobucket.com/user/herli279/media/images_1_zpsukbhp1ig.jpg.html][/URL]
Do it to bbilan, derby Milano !!!

 

[varmin]

HE DIDNT WRITE MANCINI SPENT MONEY LIKE ALL THE TEAMS IN THE PREMIERSHIP TO WIN! HOW DATE HE SPEND MONEY!?!?! HE WAS LUCKY!?!?! YOU KNOW?

yes, he spent a lot of money, but some of his transfers were pivotal for City. He got Toure for something like 25-30 mln and Silva for 25 mln. These prices are absolutely reasonable for players of this level. Even, if Man C decide to sell Silva now, they can get easily at least 20 mln for him. He brought also Dzeko, Nasri and Agureo who are one of the most important players for City in last couple of years. In the Dzeko's case, they had bought him for 35 mln and now sold him to Roma for 19, so their loss is only 16 mln, which is not much for a player like Dzeko.
For instance, see the article again - the manager before Mancini, Mark Hughes had spent over 100 pounds only for ONE summer, and the final result was team full average palyers with.

 

[.h.]

For an article written by an English guy on a website about the history of an English club, the grammatical mistakes are as atrocious as they are numerous.

It surprises me you find that so shocking.

- - - Updated - - -

In the Dzeko's case, they had bought him for 35 mln and now sold him to Roma for 19, so their loss is only 16 mln, which is not much for a player like Dzeko.

Wait, what the fuck does that EVEN MEAN!??

 

[varmin]

Wait, what the fuck does that EVEN MEAN!??

Mabye i didn't explained very well. Toninu pointed out that Mancini is spending plenty of cash and my point is that sometimes we have to look at the whole picture, not only at the part of it. And Dzeko was an example - Let say that Mancio had spent 35 mln on him for transfer fee and let say that this is much. But this summer Dzeko got sold for 19 mln and the difference is (35-19=16) 16 mln. So, it means that these 16 mln are the loss (apart of his salary of course) - Let say the "real" transfer fee for him. And under "which is not much for a player like Dzeko", i meant that this sum is even small compare to his contribution to the team during his spell there.
I dont think that Mancio's expenses there were so huge, compare to the others teams in EPL. Just see Pellegrini this year - over 70 mln for De Bryne, let say 50 for Sterling and 40 more for Otamendi = more than 160 mln., only this summer! Then just add the transfer fees of Boni, Navas, Mangala, Fernando and Fenandinho and you will get the whole picture. And this is provided he was a foundation of likes of Dzeko, Toure,Silva,Compani, Zabaleta, Kolarov, Milner and Nasri. When Mancini succeeded Hughes he'd had on his disposal only Compani, Zabaleta and Milner as far as remember and he had to start almost from the scratch to build a team.
See also Van Gaal. He's splashed crazy money for two transfer windows. 50 mln + 30 bonuses for Marcial?! WTF