Rodrigo Palacio

[ScottishInterista]

Especially since palacio missed the exact same chance 5 minutes into the game

 

[JJM]

Especially since palacio missed the exact same chance 5 minutes into the game

Well to be fair Palacio's chance did come a bit behind his butt,GabiG was served to perfection tbh
Still no excuse to fuck it up like the way granps did tho

 

[Candreva Crosses]

Good old Palacio, you don't get the credit you deserve so ima deliever some fun fact


#Fun fact:

Rodrigo has 1 assist every 109.67minutes while our latest assist hero Candreva has 1 assist every 265.25minutes.

 

[Wobblz]

Yeah and Gabriel scores every 71 minutes (the total he's played so far), which is better than Icardi.

 

[Candreva Crosses]

Yeah and Gabriel scores every 71 minutes (the total he's played so far), which is better than Icardi.

Hard to take that serious since he only scored once. But scoring wise, even Eder has better stats than Candreva.

 

[Wobblz]

Should I always put a or :troll: to get a point across?

You're proving a point using per minute stats, but then again you can't "take seriously" my claim that Gabriel is better than Icardi looking at the same metric?

 

[Kova10]

Good old Palacio, you don't get the credit you deserve so ima deliever some fun fact


#Fun fact:

Rodrigo has 1 assist every 109.67minutes while our latest assist hero Candreva has 1 assist every 265.25minutes.

Dude why the fuck are you so obsessed with candreva?
Nothing personal, just out of interest

 

[Ronin]

Palacio has played around 300 mins while Candreva a little more than 2k minutes. Eder is at around 1k.

The less you play, the better your 'per minute' stats look, which is what Wobblz is trying to point out by showing you the Gabigol scoring stats.

 

[Harpsabu]

Yeah and Gabriel scores every 71 minutes (the total he's played so far), which is better than Icardi.

My god, ruined Candreva crosses with this mate.

 

[Candreva Crosses]

Dude why the fuck are you so obsessed with candreva?
Nothing personal, just out of interest

I'm in love, thought that was clear by now.

- - - Updated - - -

Palacio has played around 300 mins while Candreva a little more than 2k minutes. Eder is at around 1k.

The less you play, the better your 'per minute' stats look, which is what Wobblz is trying to point out by showing you the Gabigol scoring stats.

Okey, so the longer time you play the worse you get?

 

[Batman]

Should I always put a or :troll: to get a point across?

You're proving a point using per minute stats, but then again you can't "take seriously" my claim that Gabriel is better than Icardi looking at the same metric?

I blame FIF for taking CC seriously, let alone his post. :troll:

 

[Candreva Crosses]

Should I always put a or :troll: to get a point across?

You're proving a point using per minute stats, but then again you can't "take seriously" my claim that Gabriel is better than Icardi looking at the same metric?

Yep, I know. I'm just trying to bring you all guys in the statistics world. The more you talk about statistics the more you'll know how shit Candreva is.

And if you don't want to talk about statistics just watch a game where Candreva plays. Last game he managed to do 2 assist and still somehow look like shit. There is a lot of good posts in the Candreva threads not by me but by others. The posts I do is just frustrated shit in that thread. I think they clearly in a good FIF managed way point out the negative sides of Candreva.

You can hate on me and all my CC posts, no problem idgaf but you can't deny the other ones posting good points.

 

[firmino]

I'm in love, thought that was clear by now.

- - - Updated - - -



Okey, so the longer time you play the worse you get?

Have you ever heard of the German motto einmal ist keinmal? It means that once is never and it is often applied to statistics, as you need large numbers for the statistics to make sense.

For instance, we could take a negative streak of Icardi and say he's like Maccarone, or we could take a positive streak and say he's better than c. Ronaldo.

20 goals in 26 matches tells you in realistic terms about the player and even more so the 67 goals in 117 matches with Inter so far (he's not a one season wonder).

 

[Candreva Crosses]

Have you ever heard of the German motto einmal ist keinmal? It means that once is never and it is often applied to statistics, as you need large numbers for the statistics to make sense.

For instance, we could take a negative streak of Icardi and say he's like Maccarone, or we could take a positive streak and say he's better than c. Ronaldo.

20 goals in 26 matches tells you in realistic terms about the player and even more so the 67 goals in 117 matches with Inter so far (he's not a one season wonder).

So me taking Candreva stats from all his games is realistic? Why do people then say stats don't speak the truth when I freaking took all the games? You only likes stats when it's not about Candreva? (Not directed against you but all the ones who say his crossing stats doesn't mean shit)

Do you see the points I'm trying to make?

 

[firmino]

So me taking Candreva stats from all his games is realistic? Why do people then say stats don't speak the truth when I freaking took all the games? You only likes stats when it's not about Candreva? (Not directed against you but all the ones who say his crossing stats doesn't mean shit)

No, I'm just saying that barbosa's statistics don't count. It's good that he scored, he won us a match, but that's pretty much it, they cannot be used for a comparison.

 

[Candreva Crosses]

No, I'm just saying that barbosa's statistics don't count. It's good that he scored, he won us a match, but that's pretty much it, they cannot be used for a comparison.

Yes, I understand. Thankyou for making that clear.


It was a joke, a bad one.

 

[Vincenzi]

So me taking Candreva stats from all his games is realistic? Why do people then say stats don't speak the truth when I freaking took all the games? You only likes stats when it's not about Candreva? (Not directed against you but all the ones who say his crossing stats doesn't mean shit)

Do you see the points I'm trying to make?

I think the problem you made isn't from using the statistics involving Candreva, but using the statistics from Palacio. Palacio hasn't played nearly as much as Candreva, so the few times he has made assists weigh more heavily on his "per minute statistics"

Basically he's saying that it's unfair to compare Palacio's assists to Candreva and use that as a metric to decide whether Palacio is a valid player or not

He used the Barbosa analogy as an exaggeration of your own analogy to explain why comparing the stats per minute fromPalacio to Candreva is an inherently flawed metric

Edit: Just to throw my own opinion in there: I don't think Palacio is quite as useless as he might seem to some, but I still cannot fathom rationalization of him being a better option as a starter than anyone we currently have up there. He fills a similar squad role as Eder in my mind, except he's ancient and imo less involved bar the occasional space making run (he had less touches than Eder against Atalanta despite being subbed in for twice as long)

 

[Candreva Crosses]

I think the problem you made isn't from using the statistics involving Candreva, but using the statistics from Palacio. Palacio hasn't played nearly as much as Candreva, so the few times he has made assists weigh more heavily on his "per minute statistics"

Basically he's saying that it's unfair to compare Palacio's assists to Candreva and use that as a metric to decide whether Palacio is a valid player or not

He used the Barbosa analogy as an exaggeration of your own analogy to explain why comparing the stats per minute fromPalacio to Candreva is an inherently flawed metric

Edit: Just to throw my own opinion in there: I don't think Palacio is quite as useless as he might seem to some, but I still cannot fathom rationalization of him being a better option as a starter than anyone we currently have up there. He fills a similar squad role as Eder in my mind, except he's ancient and imo less involved bar the occasional space making run (he had less touches than Eder against Atalanta despite being subbed in for twice as long)

I understand, and I used the Palacio to Candreva statistics as how USEFUL the statistics can be if used in a right way since the stats I provided in the Candreva thread for Candreva was ignored big times saying stats doesn't matter. If it doesn't matter why even get upset by the Palacio to Candreva statistics?

When I showed Candreva's crossing stats it was not for 1 game. Even fucking Jonathan has better stats than Candreva. You can say it's Pioli's wrong because he is making him cross idc he is shit at it. And to be clear, it's not like Candreva joined Inter and started to only cross, he has been doing that before Inter too. No wonder Juve didn't buy his ass.

 

[Ronin]

You don't make sense. First you say you liked Candreva before Pioli joined, but now you solely blame Candreva for his style of play and never wonder whether maybe he's following Pioli's tactical orders. It's just a coincidence that his style changed when Pioli joined, right?

Don't get me wrong I didn't have anything to say about him the first couple of months, I actually liked him. I think he was better with FdB. He hasn't been himself since Pioli joined and it's weird that no one has noticed it. I even remember some reporter telling Candreva to teach the fullbacks to cross at that point.

 

[Candreva Crosses]

You don't make sense. First you say you liked Candreva before Pioli joined, but now you solely blame Candreva for his style of play and never wonder whether maybe he's following Pioli's tactical orders. It's just a coincidence that his style changed when Pioli joined, right?

I think he was better with FdB yes but it will be hard to compare what change since he played under FdB to 8th november and maybe that's not enough to compare to the time under Pioli since he has played more games under Pioli. He actually had really bad statistics until last game compared to his time with FdB. Something that is frustrating too watch is his constant fakecrossings but maybe he did that too under FdB.

An experienced player according to me should be able to not only depend on 1 thing. Maybe with FdB he didn't have the freedom to do what he wants or as much as he wants(only speculating since I don't know shit about coaches order). Pioli is maybe finding his crosses very effective and continues wants him to cross AND always play him even during bad form since his crossings is so fantastic.


BUT maybe like you guys said about the statistics, for Gabi his goal/minute looks really good since he hasn't played at all and that's why maybe Candreva looks like shit now compared to during FdB and I'm completely wrong about everything.