- Joined
- Mar 4, 2004
- Messages
- 25,084
- Likes
- 49
Forum Supporter
10 years of FIF
Most Important Member
I think the Ibra debate with browha should be PRECEDED by another debate: Do you need to excel in CL/big games in order to be considered world class?
Because Ibra is definitely not world class if you consider those factors. BUT, if you define world class in another way, and that is, it's ok to bottle big games as long as you did fine in a massive majority of the small games, then Ibra is world class because he just destroys minor teams.
38 league games
You bottle 8 big games
You still have 30 games against 'small teams'
Means 90 points AKA almost automatic league title
I personally consider him world class even if he flops in Barcelona, and even if he flops in most big games. But his consistency against the smaller teams, and how he wins domestic league titles in almost every single fucking season that he plays (Milan 11/12 is the only example that comes to mind when he didn't win) is enough justification for me.
Because Ibra is definitely not world class if you consider those factors. BUT, if you define world class in another way, and that is, it's ok to bottle big games as long as you did fine in a massive majority of the small games, then Ibra is world class because he just destroys minor teams.
38 league games
You bottle 8 big games
You still have 30 games against 'small teams'
Means 90 points AKA almost automatic league title
I personally consider him world class even if he flops in Barcelona, and even if he flops in most big games. But his consistency against the smaller teams, and how he wins domestic league titles in almost every single fucking season that he plays (Milan 11/12 is the only example that comes to mind when he didn't win) is enough justification for me.