Julio Baptista

shahz_nerazzurri · Jan 16, 2010

rockball said:
This player just has no quality. There is no question of him refinding himself. What a fucking crap of a player.

Fuck Mourinho. Fuck you for this.

Its not just Mourinho's fault, its the whole boards fault. Anyways, Roma fans cant believe there are people dumb enough to pay for this guy.

Seriously do we have a deal with Roma or something? We paid 18mills for Chivu when he had only one year of his contract left with Roma, basically gave them Andreolli, paid 13 mill for Mancini, who was having a contract dispute and badly wanted out. Suffered a good 4-5 mill loss on Pizzaro in a single year (1mill + half of Pandev's right).

Roma must serioulsy love us. Any crap, disinterested player, nearing contract end -----> sell to inter for good money.

Suneet · Jan 16, 2010

Nyally is high again

.

Pato was all theirs.

Anyone who thinks this is a good signing seriously is living in the past, Baptista is a huge mistake if its happening.

Hussein · Jan 16, 2010

Sorry to interrupt the fun but this has gone too far!

You guys tend to forget that we still own the likes Jimenez, Rivas, Burdisso (hopefully not after this deal), Obinna, Mancini, and Quaresma and to be honest "the current" Baptista is better than all of them.

Let's not forget that Baptista was bought during the Spalletti era and he was good for their old formation, but now they guy just can't fit in Ranieri's system.

After all, we aren't paying any crazy money for him like we used to do in the past with other players, and I'm so happy to we are getting rid of Burdisso even if we are paying to do so, but if we didn't do so who will ever take Burdisso away from us!!

VLE · Jan 16, 2010

Baptista was not good in Spaletti era.

Hussein · Jan 16, 2010

VLE said:
Baptista was not good in Spaletti era.

OK... then let's keep Burdisso because he is better than Baptista.

Plus the Inter players are unhappy this season because they really miss their favorite barbecue chef.

VLE · Jan 16, 2010

Burdisso and BBQ changes Baptista from a bad players during Spal era to a good one? I do not see any connection.

Dressing up some random ideas as a fact and posting it seems to be a new trend. I see alot of them these days.

Hussein · Jan 16, 2010

VLE said:
Burdisso and BBQ changes Baptista from a bad players during Spal era to a good one? I do not see any connection.

Dressing up some random ideas as a fact and posting it seems to be a new trend. I see alot of them these days.

LOL!

I'm just following the trend of this forum where most people tend to think they know better.

Obviously I was sarcastic when I compared the two, but that doesn't change the fact that Burdisso is useless for us. He will never be a starter at Inter and at the age of 28-29 the best thing to do for him and us is to let him go.

Going back to Baptista, as I said he won't be worse that Jimenez, Obinna, Mancini, Vieira or Quaresma, plus he can play in various positions in midfield and attack. People keep criticizing him like the worse player ever but that's not the case. He can't be that bad if we used to play for Sevilla, Real Madrid, Arsenal, and Roma.

Definitely he is not the "ideal" signing but the deal when harm us financially to be so pessimistic about it.

ataturk5 · Jan 16, 2010

Cheer up,it could be worse,you could have given them £20 mill for aqualini!!

:wallbang:

Sneijder<3 · Jan 16, 2010

http://goal.com/en/news/11/transfer...okakas-roma-to-fulham-move-collapses-baptista

latest rumors say deal may collapse

CafeCordoba · Jan 16, 2010

Hussein said:
LOL!

I'm just following the trend of this forum where most people tend to think they know better.

Obviously I was sarcastic when I compared the two, but that doesn't change the fact that Burdisso is useless for us. He will never be a starter at Inter and at the age of 28-29 the best thing to do for him and us is to let him go.

Going back to Baptista, as I said he won't be worse that Jimenez, Obinna, Mancini, Vieira or Quaresma, plus he can play in various positions in midfield and attack. People keep criticizing him like the worse player ever but that's not the case. He can't be that bad if we used to play for Sevilla, Real Madrid, Arsenal, and Roma.

Definitely he is not the "ideal" signing but the deal when harm us financially to be so pessimistic about it.

Burdisso is useless to us? So what? Does the situation turn into better by changing him to a player who is not maybe as useless as Burdisso but pretty close?

We will have to pay money to get Baptista, he costs more than Burdisso. What's the catch? I don't follow.

The bolded part is the most ridiculous one. That's just an assumption and indicates you haven't followed the player and you haven't gather much info of his career. Listing some top clubs where a player has been can be used as an argument that he's a top player or something?

We should think about it other way. Why has he been in so many top clubs? Why does he change his club all the time? Maybe because he's so SHIT that no one wants to really keep him? Does it sound like a more reasonable reason? Because Baptista has been pretty shit during the last 4-5 years according to the fans of the clubs he's been at.

el_dude · Jan 16, 2010

eto'o<3 said:
http://goal.com/en/news/11/transfer...okakas-roma-to-fulham-move-collapses-baptista

latest rumors say deal may collapse

oh god please be true :proud:

Sassuolu · Jan 16, 2010

Without commenting on whether Baptista is good or not, do any of you think that we need MORE forwards in this team? That's the biggest problem with this transfer.

Luka · Jan 16, 2010

Diegus came yesterday night for a moment. The most interesting parts of what he said:

"Am of the opinion that we must wait and not listen to what they tell on TV or writing in newspapers giving certainty that they are not in heaven or on earth"

"I still think that does not come even if they say it's now official.

Goodnight"

szasza02 · Jan 16, 2010

as for Burdisso, he could be sold for some cash and the half of Andreolli's rights (the other half still belongs to Inter as I know). Andreolli could be loaned out and 1-2 seasons later when Cordóba and Matrix retire, he could return.
It's not like baptista is the only one who can be the exchange if the club wants to get rid of Nico.
José must seriously go through some brain damage if he thinks this dude is worthy of an Inter shirt.

Il Muro · Jan 16, 2010

vitomins said:
as the saying goes...high risk, high reward...low risk, low reward.

Don't think it quite applies here. We're not buying stocks/bonds.

Xoonky · Jan 16, 2010

I told you guys Branca was on drugs, he has lost control of self. Here's my proof. :lol:

:dielaugh:

Suneet · Jan 16, 2010

Well Mou said we need a midfielder and to me and to half the world he is a forward. I'm hoping we arent doing this transfer.

Hussein · Jan 16, 2010

CafeCordoba said:
Burdisso is useless to us? So what? Does the situation turn into better by changing him to a player who is not maybe as useless as Burdisso but pretty close?

We will have to pay money to get Baptista, he costs more than Burdisso. What's the catch? I don't follow.

In short, Burdisso is definitely USELESS, Baptista's versatility could be useful for us.

CafeCordoba said:
The bolded part is the most ridiculous one. That's just an assumption and indicates you haven't followed the player and you haven't gather much info of his career. Listing some top clubs where a player has been can be used as an argument that he's a top player or something?

We should think about it other way. Why has he been in so many top clubs? Why does he change his club all the time? Maybe because he's so SHIT that no one wants to really keep him? Does it sound like a more reasonable reason? Because Baptista has been pretty shit during the last 4-5 years according to the fans of the clubs he's been at.

I never assumed that Baptista is a good player by only looking at his CV, my opinion is based on watching him on the pitch. Listing those clubs is just to show that he can't be that bad if he managed to play for all those big clubs. It's my personal opinion and judgment and I'm not asking anyone to agree with it.

rsz85 · Jan 16, 2010

shahz_nerazzurri said:
We paid 18mills for Chivu when he had only one year of his contract left with Roma. Suffered a good 4-5 mill loss on Pizzaro in a single year (1mill + half of Pandev's right).

What Pizzarro-Pandev deal?????

I know that Pizzarro was sold in 2 season, first 6 million the first 50 %, and next summer the second 50 %, for 6 milllion again. So he was a good deal, because we bought him for 10 million from udinese.

Chivu was about 13 million+half of Andreolli, and we had to compete with the Spanisg giants. That was a reality price.

Il Muro · Jan 16, 2010

Hussein said:
In short, Burdisso is definitely USELESS, Baptista's versatility could be useful for us.

You do realise that Burdisso is also very versatile as a defender.

I never assumed that Baptista is a good player by only looking at his CV, my opinion is based on watching him on the pitch. Listing those clubs is just to show that he can't be that bad if he managed to play for all those big clubs. It's my personal opinion and judgment and I'm not asking anyone to agree with it.

Based on what i've seen of him, he is exactly the type of player we don't need. Genuine question? what qualitites have you seen from him that we currently lack in our side?

Listing the clubs was stupid because his performance at these clubs is what matters. Reyes also has prestigious clubs like Arsenal, Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid on his CV but he never played well at any of those places hence he is not rated that highly and the big clubs don't look at him anymore.

Julio Baptista

Allenatore

La Grande Inter

Capitano

Capitano

Capitano

Capitano

Capitano

Prima Squadra

Primavera

Moderator

Primavera

La Grande Inter

La Grande Inter

Capitano

Capitano

Capitano

La Grande Inter

Capitano

Capitano

Capitano