2009/2010 Midfielders rumours topic

[Luka]

i dont know this problems about Anderson.

But looking all his footballing skills (you can say it anyway) he would be a fix starter here, because he is better than Motta, Muntari, Quaresma, Mancini and maybe Stankovic

The quality without the dedication, the right attitude, discipline means bullocks.

As long as Jose is our coach, he will not grant a transfer of a player whose attitude is wrong. And if somehow our management force a move like that (as we think was the case with Arnautovic), he will be left on the stands till the point, he changes his attitude, but I doubt we will splash 20 mln or so, and wait for it to happen.

Let me put it this way rsz85. If you're an employer, you will take a less talented empleyee over a more talented employee everytime, as long as the second employee is someone you can't rely on in every situation.

 

[n4l]

i dont know this problems about Anderson.

But looking all his footballing skills (you can say it anyway) he would be a fix starter here, because he is better than Motta, Muntari, Quaresma, Mancini and maybe Stankovic

another post with delusions of grandeur..

 

[Antonio2810]

"Inter director Gabriele Oriali has welcomed the idea of attracting Napoli midfielder Marek Hamsik to the Nerazzurri. Oriali believes that the Slovakian international would be a nice addition to the team."

hope we will try to get him in summer....

 

[pazzainteramala]

"Inter director Gabriele Oriali has welcomed the idea of attracting Napoli midfielder Marek Hamsik to the Nerazzurri. Oriali believes that the Slovakian international would be a nice addition to the team."

hope we will try to get him in summer....

finally director is talking about hamsik ..can you link me that article ?

 

[coolmavs]

what about Krasic? What does everyone on the forum feel? Any good?

 

[bennyblanco]

what about Krasic? What does everyone on the forum feel? Any good?

he is class IMHO and we have spoken about him somewhere on FI but cant remember where..

hed be a welcome addition

 

[Suneet]

But didnt he want to say he wants to go to Man U or Arsenal...

 

[Black&Blue]

what about Krasic? What does everyone on the forum feel? Any good?

He's a very good player but we don't need wingers.

 

[Pajo]

He ain't winger, that is not his natral position.. He is a MC/AMC, adapted to play as winger due his speed and dribling...

He is actually all round player, can defendd very well, so he can be great CM.. And can provide adequat cover for Sneijder.. And of course, can play on the wing when needed

@Suneet
I haven't heard that, where did he say that?

 

[Antonio2810]

finally director is talking about hamsik ..can you link me that article ?

here is the original article
http://www.corrieredellosport.it/Notizie/Calcio/97645/Oriali:+«Hamsik+servirebbe+all'Inter»

it is also on goal.com

 

[bennyblanco]

But didnt he want to say he wants to go to Man U or Arsenal...

someone told me he was in a package deal to Liverpool with Jovanovic,but he is linked all round..from BBilan to Real

 

[pazzainteramala]

we better off replacing quaresma for someone like pepe at least he is promising

 

[skeet]

we don't need to replace quaresma, we just need to get rid of him

when you take out the trash you don't bring new trash in

 

[Alessandro]

we better off replacing quaresma for someone like pepe at least he is promising

Lol Pepe is a bench player at Udinese... He sucks

 

[pazzainteramala]

Lol Pepe is a bench player at Udinese... He sucks

he's better than quaresma

 

[skeet]

he's better than quaresma

that's like saying he is a step above shit

 

[pazzainteramala]

than i am better off with andrew driver

 

[Inter Siamo Noi]

not only Pepe, also me better than Quaresma. Why inter does'nt and will not give me?

 

[pazzainteramala]

why doesnt quaresma spend some time with figo shit

 

[rsz85]

i completely agree...hamsik isn't worth 20mil € and kolarov is?

i didn't watch kolarov a lot,but he is attacking fullback,maicon type...so he should provide crosses,and assists and maybe a few goals...but if stats are correct he has 1 goal and 0 assists in 20 games with average rating 5,75.and many of you said he isn't so good at defending...
so we should pay 20 mil for attacking fullback that obviously cant attack(according to stats) and is average at defending...
hamsik is CM but he scored 8 goals and provided 3 assists which is great in my opinion for his position.and we need his type of player more than a LB.
according to transfermarkt hamsik is worth 24 mil,and kolarov 9mil €
so in my opinion i would pay for hamsik 30 mil(maybe a little more)but for kolarov i wouldn't give more than 11...

i dont want to spend 20 million for Kolarov but you should watch behind the stats, too.

Do you really watch Hamsik? I saw him some game against big-teams (eg. Inter) and he was a zero.

Would he be a BIG up-grade in our play or just sign him because he score some goal? He is an AM, so what about his passing, shooting, creativity etc.? Are these attributions of him are so great?

I am NOT against him but not agree with the hype around him. Im curious, he can be so decisive here than in a smaller team? Napoli organised around him. Here, he would be one of the midfielders and we have great strikers for scoring.

Kolarov plays in a bad-form team with low morale, but start emerging. He plays more often on the midfield and looking better. He contributes to the build-up very often. so can be useful.

Summa: get both and we will see!

But dont overpay for them. They are not Fabregas/Gerrard and Clichy/Evra.