Aleksandar Kolarov

[Nero Indigo]

Santon for Kolarov must never happen! I am totally against it. If some other deal cannot be worked out then forget it. We'll wait till the summer.

 

[VLE]

we really need to sort out our formation and tactic first before buying players.
This looks no different from RM. Buy whatever, plug in after.

 

[milton]

i'm pretty sure santon is not going to play many games for us, so i think loaning him is a good idea, it helps us get kolarov and santon will probably play every week at lazio, he'll come back to inter a more experienced player

 

[Hollywood]

No way we'll give Santon for Kolarov. Unacceptable.

 

[Jimmy Page]

Thats not going to happen, it simply cant

 

[Principe]

i'm pretty sure santon is not going to play many games for us, so i think loaning him is a good idea, it helps us get kolarov and santon will probably play every week at lazio, he'll come back to inter a more experienced player

And end up playing where??? If he does well at Lazio and Kolarov is doing well at Inter then what?? We get Santon back to warm the bench??

No matter how good Kolarov is if it means losing Santon even on loan then I'm against it.

 

[Luka]

This would be a good move for me. Some of you sound like we're selling Santon, not loaning him. You guys do know he would be back in 6 months right?

Worse at loaning out a youngster is keeping him home, and then play him 5 times in the next 6 months. That gives us nothing and its a waste, especialy when we're talking about a teen youngster not a 30 year old dude. A youngster needs to play, and with Mourinho we know, that whoever deserves it plays, and younsters will always have disadvantage in this situation over seniors.

This is something I always wanted, to loan younsters, so that they can get what they can't get at Inter - playing time. But if loaning Santon means the same situation as with him at Inter, meaning not playing at all, then it is no-no for me.

Also this co-ownership could be dangarous, I think we should avoid it at all cost.

What this loan will give us if Santon plays great there, and Kolarov plays great here? It gives us 2 valid options for the first team, and also gives us old Santon who can break into the first team. Santon playing will make the odds of him going back to oldself a lot bigger. If he would stay, and Kolarov would play good enough to play him, than Santon can find himself in the same situation next year, the year after maybe.

I don't think this is better than loaning out Santon to Lazio. What is so important to keep guy who will warm bench the next 6 months most of the time? Obviously if Mourinho is currently seeing that Santon is showing sings of going back to his oldself, than leave him here. But if not, loan can be only positive(if he plays).

I'm always pro when it comes to loaning youngsters who are not playing at Inter, just warming the bench. Same is with Krhin, if Mourinho doesn't see that he might get some playing time like Santon got last season, I'm all for loaning him out too. Same with Destro. This can be only good in the long term.

 

[Suneet]

Santon is needed for the HG quota. I think that closes this stupid rumour.

 

[Luka]

That is a valid point, although it looses its importance when Santon has close to no chance of playing in CL from now on(I'm not saying he doesn't, but if Mourinho thinks that then that is the case).

In that case what is a difference if we have non playing Santon in CL quota, or non playing Caldirola in CL quota, or any other primavera youngster ?

 

[Luca-22]

This would be a good move for me. Some of you sound like we're selling Santon, not loaning him. You guys do know he would be back in 6 months right?

Worse at loaning out a youngster is keeping him home, and then play him 5 times in the next 6 months. That gives us nothing and its a waste, especialy when we're talking about a teen youngster not a 30 year old dude. A youngster needs to play, and with Mourinho we know, that whoever deserves it plays, and younsters will always have disadvantage in this situation over seniors.

This is something I always wanted, to loan younsters, so that they can get what they can't get at Inter - playing time. But if loaning Santon means the same situation as with him at Inter, meaning not playing at all, then it is no-no for me.

Also this co-ownership could be dangarous, I think we should avoid it at all cost.

What this loan will give us if Santon plays great there, and Kolarov plays great here? It gives us 2 valid options for the first team, and also gives us old Santon who can break into the first team. Santon playing will make the odds of him going back to oldself a lot bigger. If he would stay, and Kolarov would play good enough to play him, than Santon can find himself in the same situation next year, the year after maybe.

I don't think this is better than loaning out Santon to Lazio. What is so important to keep guy who will warm bench the next 6 months most of the time? Obviously if Mourinho is currently seeing that Santon is showing sings of going back to his oldself, than leave him here. But if not, loan can be only positive(if he plays).

I'm always pro when it comes to loaning youngsters who are not playing at Inter, just warming the bench. Same is with Krhin, if Mourinho doesn't see that he might get some playing time like Santon got last season, I'm all for loaning him out too. Same with Destro. This can be only good in the long term.

I agree, and if Maicon leaves in the near future (which isn't very unlikely) and Santon improves at lazio and comes back then we immediatly have a replacement for the RB position, and have a good player at LB (Kolarov). So this could turn out to be a good move. But I only want a half year loan, nothing more like a co-ownership.

 

[Suneet]

Well Santon has more of a chance than Caldirola.

With Cordoba going, Santon wont be useless forever.

 

[Luka]

You're right Suneet.

If Cordoba will go, then Chviu should be back to Center back position and compete with Samuel and Lucio, and that leaves only Santon and Zanetti as a left back.

But even though the odds will be better for Santon to play, I don't think there will be any difference. First of all I don't think Cordoba will go if Kolarov won't come. It is still possible, but we gain a little from this kind of a deal. And second of all Chivu will not compete with Santon anymore, but Kolarov will jump into the basket.

Anyway I'm ok either way. Just don't sell him, or co-own him. If we decide a loan can be positive, I'm all for it.

A completely different matter is that I can't find a single reason why Lolito would gain anything from it. What is it for him to loan a guy who wasn't himself last 6 months, who didn't play at Inter much, and who will be back in the summer with us. This gives absolutely nothing to Lolito, Lazio is too big of a club to gain anything from it. It is a different thing to loan someone to Bari, and loan someone to Fiorentina, Lazio or Genoa.

That's why I don't think Santon will end up at Lazio. Lolito won't accept the loan, and we won't accept the co-own offer.

 

[Suneet]

I think all Santon needs is one good performance, anyways, lets stick to Kolarov.

The most important thing in this rumour is will Lotito who will be pissed off with us sit down and discuss?

 

[Principe]

Why would Lotito be pissed off at us. We never told Pandev to go to court he did it himself. Any team would jump on the Pandev deal for free I don't see why Lotito would get bothered I'm sure Moratti has a great friendship with him and he knows that this is strictly business and none of it was dirty business.

 

[UltrasLjubljana]

put Galliani at left side and he will play beter then Kolarov...
We are great club and we need great players!!

 

[shahz_nerazzurri]

Anyone remember this?

[youtube]URCPRGhKS3o[/youtube]

Kolarov makes sense in a way, as opposing to increase the creativity in our midfield, we will have two very attacking full backs providing us with much needed creativity. I wont mind Kolarov.

But I really dont think Lotito would let him go. Him along with Zarate are the only reason Lazio are not in bottom place right now. They loose him, they will get relegated.

 

[szasza02]

lol I haven't seen this goal. what were the rome midfield and defence doing? I mean teams are so defensive when they play against Inter, it takes much much more to score a goal like that than what you can see on this vid. He dribbles like 60 metres without facing a single roma player, than he gets past two while they just stand by. I can't really remember such Inter goal EVER (maybe it's just me though).

 

[Pravesh]

lol I haven't seen this goal. what were the rome midfield and defence doing? I mean teams are so defensive when they play against Inter, it takes much much more to score a goal like that than what you can see on this vid. He dribbles like 60 metres without facing a single roma player, than he gets past two while they just stand by. I can't really remember such Inter goal EVER (maybe it's just me though).

Adriano against Udinese.

 

[CafeCordoba]

If player is an attacking full-back, that doesn't mean he's a creative player. I'd prefer so much more actual creative players in the midfield, than some attacking fullback on the flank.

 

[rsz85]

Santon for Kolarov? Oh yeah, after the Cannavaro-Carini swap....

Then we should swap Maicon for Salihamidzic or Sneijder for Storari.