not good at all.
Great dives and play acting these past 4 games for Argentina.
Dude is good…. But no where near 60 million. For me he is who we should be trying to sell to balance our books. But copa america is showing how limited he is. Tho everyone sucks when they play for Argentina. That teams game plan is pass it to the midget… if he doesn’t play well the team plays bad
Great dives and play acting these past 4 games for Argentina.
Dude is good…. But no where near 60 million. For me he is who we should be trying to sell to balance our books. But copa america is showing how limited he is. Tho everyone sucks when they play for Argentina. That teams game plan is pass it to the midget… if he doesn’t play well the team plays bad
Hot take: If he stays here he'll struggle without Conte.
So, something like 45 after 3 weeks of negotiations?According to Tuttosport his price tag is 90M.
Lautaro worth much more than Icardi. Lautaro offers many other qualities besides goals, and doesn't have the scandals to deteriorate his own value.Given the current circumstances , no one will sign lautaro for more than 40m plus bonuses. We sold icardi a 2 time capocannoniare for 50m
If we have a price tag of 90m for him how were we not better off selling him over Hakimi? I suppose you could say there are no potential buyers at the moment because Barca signed Aguero but I'd like to think Man City would be interested.
And Lautaro hasn't had a mystery injury and not played for 6 months.Lautaro worth much more than Icardi. Lautaro offers many other qualities besides goals, and doesn't have the scandals to deteriorate his own value.
If that's the case than I wish we would've worked something out with them. 70-80m for Lautaro is much better financially than the Hakimi sale.Because no one offered 90m€. Or 80m€, or 70m€. It's claimed Atletico made an offer, but for 50m€.
YeahHas he been benched in Copa America?
Yeah