- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
- Messages
- 35,130
- Likes
- 18,215
![](/img/awards/10 years of FIF.png)
![](/img/awards/Nostradamus.png)
![](/img/awards/Most Passionate Member.png)
That's why they're trying really hard to make the shirt look hideousSpeaking facts though
That's why they're trying really hard to make the shirt look hideousSpeaking facts though
open the tweet for remaining parts
Lmao if players, club and coaches are nothing for fans then why we are even here
open the tweet for remaining parts
Yea. This is my sentiment.Someone please tell me why we sold him for 115 when it is clear like daylight they would have paid 130.
Yet Man Utd just bought Sancho and City just bought Grealish. Pandemic doesn't mean fuck to these EPL scams. While I agree that 115m is still a great price, Chelsea literally had no other choice. Let's not forget we wanted 80m or nothing for Hakimi yet they were able to get him for 70m with add ons and prolly a hand job for Marotta from NasserPlease. 115m€ is the record fee of Serie A history. And it was done during global pandemic.
The rumored asking price of 130m€ was a rumor. No one knows how the negotiations really went. Now people get fixated over that number because it was mentioned first. But if it wasn't ever mentioned, suggesting in July that we'd get 115m€ for Lukaku and vast majority of the forum would have signed up for that.
And my main point is simply that it could've been even better.The main point is we got a good if not great price for Lukaku. And that's irregardless of who the buyer is.