- Joined
- Aug 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,629
- Likes
- 795
- Favorite Player
- #INTER BALLS
![](/img/awards/10 years of FIF.png)
I wan’t Sadio Mane ![Einstein :einstein: :einstein:](/img/smilies/einstein.png)
![Einstein :einstein: :einstein:](/img/smilies/einstein.png)
the evaluations on Alvaro Morata of Atletico Madrid continue, but the Rossoneri will not be able to take advantage of the Growth Decree anyway, because - after the Farewell to Juventus a year ago – the Spaniard did not spend the required two years outside Italy.Not that I want him here at all but why no growth decree?
I'm not sure. He returned end of June 22, so one financial year outside of Italy, and it's past 1st July so a 2nd financial year out of Italythe evaluations on Alvaro Morata of Atletico Madrid continue, but the Rossoneri will not be able to take advantage of the Growth Decree anyway, because - after the Farewell to Juventus a year ago – the Spaniard did not spend the required two years outside Italy.
This is from DiMarzio, but Lukaku didn't spend 2 years at Chelsea either, so not really sure tbh.
This is the second year so if he returns now, he is indeed not available for Growth Decree.I'm not sure. He returned end of June 22, so one financial year outside of Italy, and it's past 1st July so a 2nd financial year out of Italy
this year he cant be counted as an italian tax resident - its already more than halfway through the year, so it would be 2 financial years non-resident in italy which I think should make him eligible. Same reason why we had to sign Lukaku by a certain date.This is the second year so if he returns now, he is indeed not available for Growth Decree.
IMO that should be the deal breaker here unless he drops his salary a lot. I wouldn't accept 6m salary. We would be giving him probably at least 4 years.
Lukaku was out for only 1 year, why would he be eligible then?this year he cant be counted as an italian tax resident - its already more than halfway through the year, so it would be 2 financial years non-resident in italy which I think should make him eligible. Same reason why we had to sign Lukaku by a certain date.
He was out less than one year, that why he was eligible. Because he was never out. He left in August and came back before July.Lukaku was out for only 1 year, why would he be eligible then?
Yes. Everyone is better option right now than him. He's a rat and piece of shit.Hope everyone is happy when we sign Zapata over lukaku
actually he was out for 0 years. He left in Aug, and came back before July, so I think it was a "continuation" of his growth decree (which is why we had to sign him before 1st July)Lukaku was out for only 1 year, why would he be eligible then?
Its based on Italian tax year - which is calendar year. You need to be resident for the majority of the year to be tax resident, so either 1 Jan -> 1 July, or 30th June -> 31st Dec, basicallyHe was out less than one year, that why he was eligible. Because he was never out. He left in August and came back before July.
So I guess they look them based on calendar.
While Morata has been out for over an year now so there is one year gap. But that's not enough because he needs two-year gap.