What do I have to do this?
I said Eriksen is not the biggest Bosman ever because he's not. The way the sentence was structured implies a matter of quality.
If you want to talk about the financial aspect, sure go ahead. But "you guys are forgetting" that you have to adjust everything related to cost to the evergrowing revenue streams of these clubs.
And if the Ballack one was current, it'd be an even bigger one as we're talking about a leading player of a Leverkusen that made the CL final (Eriksen has a similar run) who on top of that led a lackluster German NT that no one expected to go far to the WC final (should have been Spain or Italy from that path, but blame Korea and FIFA for that), then moved to play for Bayern Munich on a big transfer, which Eriksen never accomplished (equivalent would have been going to Man City in a transfer), won 3 leagues in 4 seasons. And then he makes this move. This player would be worth a lot more than Eriksen. This player today is probably Kevin De Bruyne actually without being a failed transfer somewhere.
Eriksen is a very good player that we'd love to have because he has characteristics that are valuable. Whether or not today's market is inflated doesn't mean shit.
We sold Ronaldo to Real Madrid for 46m euros + some first options on a couple of players (Santiago Solari, I think Cambiasso was also included and probably another 1-2 guys).
Are you telling me that I only have to account for whatever inflation there was in the economy to consider that this would have been a 300m transfer today?