Shame on Manncini for wanting better players like any manager at a.big club.
Other Managers want better players to improve their tactics, Mancini wants better players because he's clueless and needs their individual class. Big difference.
Shame on Manncini for wanting better players like any manager at a.big club.
Sunni group are INVESTORS in Inter Milan.
Chinese investors are now investing in football, because it will give them more money.
With all these investors from USA, Russia, Sjeiks, China my interest in football is dying,
Sunni group wants 'future, investment in 'youth'......... so they can sell them later on with profit = happy investors.
Fuck Sunni group, fuck modern football and fuck Mancini!
Other Managers want better players to improve their tactics, Mancini wants better players because he's clueless and needs their individual class. Big difference.
These are just the kind of naive statements we see here on FIF about every single Inter manager after a few months... stay real, mate, there is a good chance that if Mancini leaves us the next coach is going to be a downgrade. Or even worse...
Mancini is tactically limited, always was, no arguments there. Just to oversimplify for a minute, there are two types of successful coaches:
Type A: There are coaches who like to formulate their tactics based on the players they have... these coaches are rare, and their key strengths are tactical acumen and superior training methods. A good example of this is Ancelotti.
Type B: Then there are coaches who have a fixed idea how they like to play. They like to mould/buy players to suit this particular style. Their key strengths usually are the ability to identify gaps, find the right players to fill these gaps, and motivate players. Mourinho is a great example of this. A level lower, Mancini also belongs to this group. So does Capello.
This is not to generalise that Type B coaches are always tactically limited, or that Type A coaches don't have a preferred style. However, Type B coaches can be successful even when they are tactically limited (as in Mancini's case), because they always set up their team to play 1 tactic/style they are very familiar with. But these coaches need players who suit that basic tactical set up.
Another example of Type B is Conte. He does not seem tactically limited like Mancini, but from the small career he has had so far, you can clearly see he has a fixed style. It came to fore in his Azzurri stint, when he ignored better talents to keep focusing on "his players" who suit his style. That is why the likes of Giacherini, Parolo, Candreva etc were preferred to players like Berardi, Jorginho, Bernardeschi, etc.
Mancini is not at the level of a Mourinho (or even Conte), but he is a decent manager overall. He is very good at setting teams up to his basic tactical set up, and once he has got all the pieces to the puzzle, his teams are quite formidable. One track ponies, yes, but very good nevertheless. What you are calling "he needs individual class" is actually more like "he needs players who fit his set up". And contrary to the popular opinion here, Mancini has done this before within tight budgetary constraints (his last stint at Inter, for e.g.). Which is why I would prefer Mancini to see out his contract at Inter, because he will leave us much stronger.
Yeah, if we get a chance to hire a better coach (say like Simeone) who can stay with us for the next 3-5 years, then sure sack Mancini. That makes sense. But the worst thing Inter can do at this moment is to let Mancini go and "hire whatever best option is available"... that kind of clueless planning is why we are in this shithole. The next coach needs to be a natural progression for the long term, not a "quick fix".
Im sure this will be a scenario here.And then new,"Suning coach" next summer...Which is why I would prefer Mancini to see out his contract at Inter, because he will leave us much stronger.
Yeah, if we get a chance to hire a better coach (say like Simeone) who can stay with us for the next 3-5 years, then sure sack Mancini. That makes sense. But the worst thing Inter can do at this moment is to let Mancini go and "hire whatever best option is available"... that kind of clueless planning is why we are in this shithole. The next coach needs to be a natural progression for the long term, not a "quick fix".
I do agree with general idea of having different types of coaches, but can you please just explain what is in your opinion Mancini's preferred tactic, fixed style or basic setup he did set up so far?
What are the most notable traits of his tenure at Inter?
Erm,Ausilio is our technical/sporting director,not just transfer managerregardless of who the coach is, we desperately need a new and important sporting director: i mean, neither thohir nor suning know shit about football, so it's hard for them to have a dialogue with the coach (whoever he is) without the mediation of a sporting director. i guess oriali could be the man, or leonardo, too, or someone else but we really need this professional figure and we need it as soon as possible.
by the way, gazzetta titles that within the next48 hours mancini will probably resign.
Erm,Ausilio is our technical/sporting director,not just transfer manager
I'd keep Ausilio but he needs help, clearlythat is why i specified "new and important". blivious: ausilio is a good guy but honestly we need something else, he should just handle the negotiations of the transfers.
Who the fuck we gonna sign if Mancio resigns?
This is so catastrophic, specially to our start of the season. Which players want to come to Inter when it's this kind of circus?
Or worse, which of our key players will now put in transfer requests... or after 6 months when things go topsy-turvy...
I'd keep Ausilio but he needs help, clearly
He has too many responsibilities
I dunno what that Giardini dude does but it's not dealing with the players.
I'd bring Lele back for sure
De Boer?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk