Anything you like.
Let's merge this thread with the bullshit thread.
I’m almost on the brink of an agreement, but I still have hope even after plus 20 years.
Anything you like.
Let's merge this thread with the bullshit thread.
I m just not convinced by this theory, like imho the while financing of the project is gonna be a lot harder for us pre sale than after sale... On top of that if your the buyer your gonna inherit the zhangs financing as in you cannot amend the deals. Also you get 0 say in where the stadium is and how it looks.This stadium thing is heavily connected to the club sale. I've been saying this for quite some time and still think as long as there is nothing tangible with the stadium, club won't be sold. But once there is, sale might happen.
Is it Rosano better option? Is there in Milano or around city some better position to build stadium?San Donato is a shit area
Linate Only matters for Italians as it’s mostly a domestic.. for international visitors it’s not really much of an advantage as they arrive at Malpensa
Is it Rosano better option? Is there in Milano or around city some better position to build stadium?
Maybe I expressed myself poorly. What I meant is what you said, that the actual stadium will be built by the new owners. But Zhangs need to find the stadium deal first. So that the new owners know they can build the stadium. They have the deal, agreements, permits, etc.I m just not convinced by this theory, like imho the while financing of the project is gonna be a lot harder for us pre sale than after sale... On top of that if your the buyer your gonna inherit the zhangs financing as in you cannot amend the deals. Also you get 0 say in where the stadium is and how it looks.
If I m gonna spend 1.3bio on a club i might want to have a say in these things and getting in after a deal is struck is only gonna make this harder.
Also arguably the pressure to sell for suning gets a lot lower once everything is settled for the stadium cause then we d have a pretty clear path to break even.
Of course on the other hand with a deal inplace you know what you get and you dont have to battle italian bureaucrats and politicians..
Thank you for explanation and your opinion.Rozzano is perfectly fine, it right at mediolanum forum and milanofiori, plenty of hotels and conference facilities in the area, plenty of parking, freeway right at the door. It is absolutely no coincidence Inter look in that area, the council seem interested in the project…
I’ll pick Rozzano/Assago any day over San Donato frankly.
It’s not sexy but it’s fine
AgreedRozzano is perfectly fine, it right at mediolanum forum and milanofiori, plenty of hotels and conference facilities in the area, plenty of parking, freeway right at the door. It is absolutely no coincidence Inter look in that area, the council seem interested in the project…
I’ll pick Rozzano/Assago any day over San Donato frankly.
It’s not sexy but it’s fine
TrueSan Donato is a shit area
Linate Only matters for Italians as it’s mostly a domestic.. for international visitors it’s not really much of an advantage as they arrive at Malpensa
The nevernding saga..The Rossoneri recently presented their new stadium project, hoping to build the facilities at the San Donato area of the city. Feasibility assessments are currently ongoing, and the club are moving forward with confidence, keen to leave the city owned Stadio Giuseppe Meazza in the near future.
Inter have also been hoping to build their own stadium for a number of years now and briefly worked with Milan on a joint project, before splitting off to go their own way. One of the Nerazzurri’s ideas is to build a new home in the Rozzano neighbourhood of the city.
Speaking to La Repubblica via Calciomercato.com, mayor of Milan Sala first expressed his frustration that the current Stadio Giuseppe Meazza will be given protected status by Emanuela Carpani, Lombardy’s superintendent for cultural heritage.
“The restriction placed is a shameful thing. If you place a cultural restriction on a place where football is played, then let’s extend it to 90% of Milan’s buildings. All the mayors agree that the Superintendents have excessive power.”
Sala then discussed what’ll happen next, considering that the plans for San Siro have now changed.
“Not being able to tear down the old San Siro means that the new stadium will not be able to be built next to it, because two functioning stadiums would lead to 150 to 200 days of events per year. Who’s going to tell the residents of the neighbourhood?
“As a Milanese, I’m sorry if Milan go to build their facility in San Donato. The fact remains that if fixing the Meazza with two teams playing there is impossible, doing it with just one is more feasible.
“I continue to think that San Siro has its reason to exist for the future too, even if it won’t be an eternal future.
“In 2026 there will be the inaugural ceremony of the Winter Olympics and that year the Champions League final will most likely be at San Siro. In short, it is a stadium that is anything but dead.”
I imagine Investcorp will build new stadium so they can spend more money in the yrs to come.
If anything, this means that there'll be almost nothing about new infrastructure in Italy.Italy and Turkey officially won a joint bid for the 2032 Euros. We have to hope this helps facilitate a new stadium for us.